DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimization of aircraft fuel consumption and reduction of pollutant emissions: Environmental impact assessment

  • Khardi, Salah (French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Development and Networks, AME Department, Transport and Environment Laboratory)
  • Received : 2013.11.13
  • Accepted : 2014.03.12
  • Published : 2014.07.25

Abstract

Environmental impact of aircraft emissions can be addressed in two ways. Air quality impact occurs during landings and takeoffs while in-flight impact during climbs and cruises influences climate change, ozone and UV-radiation. The aim of this paper is to investigate airports related local emissions and fuel consumption (FC). It gives flight path optimization model linked to a dispersion model as well as numerical methods. Operational factors are considered and the cost function integrates objectives taking into account FC and induced pollutant concentrations. We have compared pollutants emitted and their reduction during LTO cycles, optimized flight path and with analysis by Dopelheuer. Pollutants appearing from incomplete and complete combustion processes have been discussed. Because of calculation difficulties, no assessment has been made for the soot, $H_2O$ and $PM_{2.5}$. In addition, because of the low reliability of models quantifying pollutant emissions of the APU, an empirical evaluation has been done. This is based on Benson's fuel flow method. A new model, giving FC and predicting the in-flight emissions, has been developed. It fits with the Boeing FC model. We confirm that FC can be reduced by 3% for takeoffs and 27% for landings. This contributes to analyze the intelligent fuel gauge computing the in-flight fuel flow. Further research is needed to define the role of $NO_x$ which is emitted during the combustion process derived from the ambient air, not the fuel. Models are needed for analyzing the effects of fleet composition and engine combinations on emission factors and fuel flow assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdallah, A., Haddou, M. and Khardi, S. (2010), "Optimization of operational aircraft parameters reducing noise emission", Appl. Math. Sci., 4(1), 515-535.
  2. Alam, S., Nguyen, M.H., Abbass, H.A. and Lokan, C. (2011), "Multi-aircraft dynamic continuous descent approach methodology for low-noise and emission guidance", J. Aircraft, 48(4), 1225-1237. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031241
  3. AMPL. A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming, http://www.ampl.com
  4. Benson, T.J. (1995), "An interactive educational tool for turbojet engines", Tech. Rep., NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135, USA.
  5. Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L. and Nemirovski, A. (2006), "Foreword: Special issue on robust optimization", Math. Program., Ser., B107, 1-3.
  6. CAEP/7-WP/61 (200), Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (Seventh Meeting), Agenda Item 4: Future work, APU $NO_x$ emissions; A case for action, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 5-16 February.
  7. CAEP/8-WP/61 (2010), Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (Eighth Meeting), Agenda Item 2: Review of technical proposals relating to aircraft engine emissions, Airports' vies of new $NO_x$ stringency standard, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1-12 February.
  8. Cao, Y., Rathinam, S., Sun, D., DeLaurentis, D. and Post, J. (2011), "A rescheduling method for conflict-free continuous descent approach", AIAA Paper 2011-6218.
  9. Carvalho, J.C., Nichimura, E.R., Vilhena, M.T.M.B., Moreira, D.M. and Degrazia, G.A. (2005), "An iterative Langevin solution for contaminant dispersion simulation using the Gram-Charlier PDF", Environ. Model. Software, 20(3), 1364-8152.
  10. Carvalho, J.C., Vilhena, M.T. and Moreira, D.M. (2007), "Comparison between Eulerian and Lagrangian semi-analytical models to simulate the pollutant dispersion in the PBL", Appl. Math. Model., 31(1), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2005.08.009
  11. Celikel, A., Duchene, N., Fuller, I., Silue, M., Fleuti, E., Hofmann, P. and Moore, T. (2005), "Eurocontrol: Airport local air quality studies - Case study: Emission inventory for Zurich Airport with different methodologies", EEC/SEE/2004/010.
  12. Dopelheuer, A. (2000), "Aircraft emission parameter modelling", Air Space Europe, 2(3), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1290-0958(00)80060-X
  13. Dubois, D. and Paynter, G. (2006), "Fuel flow method 2 for estimating aircraft emissions", Boeing Co., SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1987, p. 13.
  14. EEA-EMEP (2009), "EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook".
  15. EEA (2013), http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/air/intro/, Page Last modified 05 September 2013.
  16. EngineSim (2012), Version 1.7b Ed. Benson T., NASA, Glenn Research Center, Update version 2012.
  17. Eurocontrol (2009a), Model Accuracy Summary Report for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA)-Revision 3.7, EEC Technical Report No. 2009-006, EUROCONTROL EEC.
  18. Eurocontrol (2009b), "User manual for the base of aircraft data (BADA)", Revision 3.7, EEC Technical Report No. 2009-003, EUROCONTROL EEC.
  19. FAA (2011), FAA Aerospace Forecast Fiscal Years 2011-2031, U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Policy and Plans.
  20. Ferrero, E. and Anfossi, D. (1998), "Comparison of PDFs, closures schemes and turbulence parameterizations in Lagrangian Stochastic Models", Int. J. Environ. Pollution, 9, 384-410.
  21. Gothenbourg Protocols (2003), The 1998 Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), Status of ratification; entered into force on 23 October 2003.
  22. Gothenbourg Protocols (2005), The 1999 protocols to abate acidification, eutrophication and ground level ozone, status of ratification 17 May 2005.
  23. Henschel, S., Khardi, S. and Goodman, P. (2012), "Ground level air quality at airports and the impact of emissions due to different traffic servicing patters at/around the airport zone", Project Report of Dublin Institute of Technology, DIT SHPG-12032012.
  24. IATA (International Air Transport Association) (2010a), "Fact sheet: environment".
  25. IATA (International Air Transport Association) (2010b), "Fuel efficiency".
  26. ICAO (2006), "Edition-OPS-Aircraft-Operations-Flight-Procedures", (5th Edition), Doc-8168-Vol-1-5.
  27. ICAO (2007), "Airport Local Air Quality Guidance Manual", Preliminary Unedited Version, Doc 9889.
  28. ICAO (2008), "Aircraft Engine Emissions", Annex-16, (3rd Edition), Vol. 2.
  29. ICAO (2009), "Policies on Charges for Airports and Air Navigation Services", (8th Edition), Doc 9082.
  30. ICAO (2011a), "Airport Air Quality Guidance Manual", (1st Edition), Doc 9889.
  31. ICAO (2011b), "Aircraft Engine Emissions".
  32. ICAO (2011c), "ICAO in Brief".
  33. ICAO (2011d), "Environment Branch - Local Air Quality".
  34. Khardi, S. (2011), "Development of innovative optimized flight paths of aircraft takeoffs reducing noise and fuel consumption", Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 97(1), 148-154. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918395
  35. Khardi, S. (2012), "Aircraft shortest and fastest continuous descent approach development", American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronomics, J. Aircraft, 49(6), 1931-1939. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031775
  36. Khardi, S., Abdallah, L., Konovalova, O. and Houacine, H. (2010), "Optimal approach minimizing aircraft noise and fuel consumption", Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 96(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918257
  37. Khardi, S., Nahayo, F. and Haddou, M. (2011), "The trust region sequential quadratic programming method applied to two-aircraft acoustic optimal control problem", Appl. Math. Sci., 5(40), 1953-1976.
  38. Kurniawan, J. and Khardi, S. (2011), "Comparison of methodologies estimating emissions of aircraft pollutants, environmental impact assessment around airports", Environ. Impact Assess. Review, 31(3), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.09.001
  39. Li, J., Yi, C. and Dengfeng, S. (2013), "Investigation of potential fuel savings due to continuous-descent approach", J. Aircraft, 50(3), 807-816. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032000
  40. Rodean, H.C. (1996), "Stochastic Lagrangian models of turbulent diffusion", Meteorol. Monogr., 26, 1-84. https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401-26.48.1
  41. Sopjes, R., De Jong, P.M.A., Borst, C. and van Oaassen, M.M. (2011), "Continuous descent approaches with variable flight-path angles under time constraints", AIAA Paper 2011-6219, August.
  42. SOURDINE II WP5, D5-2 (2006), "Airport noise and emission modelling methodology", Project No. GRD2-2000-30105, Contract No. G4RD-CT-2000-00394.
  43. Tenny, M.J., Wright, S.J. and Rawlings, J.B. (2002), "Nonlinear model predictive control via feasibility perturbed sequential quadratic programming", Optimization Technical Report, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Computer Sciences Departments 02-06, Also Texas-Wisconsin Modeling and Control Consortium Report T\MCC-2002-02.
  44. UAF (Union des Aeroports Francais) (2012), "Resultats d'activite des aeroports francais 2011", Statistiques de trafic, 70 pages.
  45. UNECE, "Protocols and the Convention" - http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/welcome.html
  46. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) (2013), "Health Effects of Particulate Matter".
  47. Van Ulden, A.P. (1978), "Simple estimates for vertical diffusion from sources near the ground", Atmos. Environ., 12(11), 2125-2129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(78)90167-1
  48. Vilhena, M.T., Rizza, U., Degrazia, G.A., Mangia, C., Moreira, D.M. and Tirabassi, T. (1998), "An analytical air pollution model: Development and evaluation", Contrib. Atmos. Phys., 71(3), 315-320.
  49. Zaporozhets, O.I. and Khardi, S. (2004), Optimization of Aircraft Trajectories as a Basis for Noise Abatement Procedures Around Airports, Theoretical Considerations and Acoustic Applications, Rapport INRETS $n^{\circ}$ 257, 97 pages, Les collections de l'INRETS, Paris, France.

Cited by

  1. Design optimization of a fixed wing aircraft vol.4, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2017.4.1.065