DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Problems and Improvements of the Class B Articles of Clothing and Personal Belongings Design Classification under the Korean Design Protection Act

디자인보호법 물품구분표상 B군 의복 및 신변용품 분류체계 개선안

  • Cho, Kyeong Sook (Dept. of Fashion Design, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Jo, Jae Shin (Innovation Center for Engineering Education, Chonnam National University)
  • 조경숙 (성균관대학교 예술대학 의상학과) ;
  • 조재신 (전남대학교 공학교육혁신센터)
  • Received : 2014.03.24
  • Accepted : 2014.06.07
  • Published : 2014.08.31

Abstract

The Design Protection Act of Korea classifies industrial designs into examined-based and unexamined-based articles. For design application and registration under the DPA, applicable product for the design needs to be chosen in order for it to be registered. Clothing and personal belongings under class B in the classification list are subject to unexamined-based articles. A sound and logical classification system will lead to higher administrative efficiency as well as assurance of more convenience for the system users. This paper examines the suitability of the design classification for clothing and personal belongings and purposes to suggest improvements.

Keywords

References

  1. 양종윤 (2006), 디자인 무심사등록제도의 문제점에 대한 연구, 연세대학교 석사학위논문, pp. 33-34.
  2. 특허청 (2006), 디자인 무심사 등록제도 개선에 관한 연구, pp. 107-109.
  3. "통계/동향/분석 지식재산권 통계-물품군별 디자인 출원건수", 자료검색일 2013. 8. 6, http://www.kipo.go.kr/kpo/user.tdf?a=user.html.HtmlApp&c=3041&catmenu=m02_05_01
  4. 진선태 (2011), 디자인과 디자인보호분야 사이의 통념 차이, 디자인학연구, 24(3), p. 255.
  5. 특허청 (2011), 헤이그 협정 및 로카르노 분류 도입에 따른 디자인 무심사 품목 재조정 방안 연구, p. 97.
  6. 특허청 (2011), 헤이그 협정 및 로카르노 분류 도입에 따른 디자인 무심사 품목 재조정 방안 연구, pp. 124-125.
  7. 특허청 (2006), 디자인 무심사 등록제도 개선에 관한연구, p. 117.
  8. 특허청 (2006), 디자인 무심사 등록제도 개선에 관한 연구, p. 107.
  9. 다음 어학 영영사전, "panty," 자료검색일 2014. 1. 20, http://dic.daum.net/word/view.do?wordid=eew000049483&q=panty
  10. 특허정보넷, 자료검색일 2014. 2. 27, http://kdtj.kipris.or.kr/kdtj/searchLogina.do?method=loginDG&checkPot=Y

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Legal Protection of Fashion Designs and its Possibility under the Korean Design Protection Act - Based on the Review of Cases Related to the Requirements for a Design Definition and Acquisition of Design Rights and the Judgment of Design Identity & Similarity - vol.66, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7233/jksc.2016.66.1.028