DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Using education on irradiated foods to change behavior of Korean elementary, middle, and high school students

  • Han, Eunok (Department of Education & Research, Korea Academy of Nuclear Safety) ;
  • Kim, Jaerok (Department of Education & Research, Korea Academy of Nuclear Safety) ;
  • Choi, Yoonseok (Department of Education & Research, Korea Academy of Nuclear Safety)
  • Received : 2014.03.24
  • Accepted : 2014.08.08
  • Published : 2014.10.01

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Educational interventions targeted food selection perception, knowledge, attitude, and behavior. Education regarding irradiated food was intended to change food selection behavior specific to it. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: There were 43 elementary students (35.0%), 45 middle school students (36.6%), and 35 high school students (28.5%). The first step was research design. Educational targets were selected and informed consent was obtained in step two. An initial survey was conducted as step three. Step four was a 45 minute-long theoretical educational intervention. Step five concluded with a survey and experiment on food selection behavior. RESULTS: As a result of conducting a 45 minute-long education on the principles, actual state of usage, and pros and cons of irradiated food for elementary, middle, and high-school students in Korea, perception, knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding the irradiated food was significantly higher after the education than before the education (P < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The behavior of irradiated food selection shows high correlation with all variables of perception, knowledge, and attitude, and it is necessary to provide information of each level of change in perception, knowledge, and attitude in order to derive proper behavior change, which is the ultimate goal of the education.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee JW. Application and prospect of food irradiation for providing the safe food materials. Food Ind Nutr 2006;11:12-20.
  2. Choi MH, Youn SJ, Ahn YS, Seo KJ, Park KH, Kim GH. A survey on the consumer's recognition of food labeling in Seoul area. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2010;39:1555-64. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.10.1555
  3. Health Canada, Health Products and Food Branch; Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Recommended Canadian Code of Practice for Food Irradiation. Ottawa: Canadian Food Inspection Agency; 2002.
  4. Korea Food and Drug Administration. Guidebook on Food Labeling Standards. 1st ed. Cheongju: Korea Food and Drug Administration;2010.
  5. Korea Food and Drug Administration. Guidebook on Food Labeling Standards. 2nd ed. Cheongju: Korea Food and Drug Administration;2012.
  6. World Health Organization (CH). Wholesomeness of Irradiated Food: Report of a Joint FAO/IAEA/WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organization Technical Report Series 659. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1981.
  7. World Health Organization (CH). High-dose Irradiation: Wholesomeness of Food Irradiated with Doses above 10 kGy: Report of a Joint FAO/IAEA/WHO Study Group. WHO Technical Report Series 890. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999.
  8. European Commission. Statement of the Scientific Committee on Food on a Report on 2-alkylcyclobutanone (expressed on 3 July 2002). SCF/CS/NF/IRR/26 ADD 3 Final. Brussels: European Commission;2002.
  9. Codex Committee on Food Additives. Codex General Standard for Irradiated Foods: CODEX STAN106-1983. [place unknown]: Codex Committee on Food Additives; 2003.
  10. Kume T, Furuta M, Todoriki S, Uenoyama N, Kobayashi Y. Status of food irradiation in the world. Radiat Phys Chem 2009;78:222-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2008.09.009
  11. Wood OB, Bruhn CM. Position of the American Dietetic Association: food irradiation. J Am Diet Assoc 2000;100:246-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00075-4
  12. Deeley CM, Gao M, Hunter R, Ehlermann DA (GB). The development of food irradiation to-date in Asia Pacific, the Americas, Europe and Africa. Proceedings of the 14th International Meeting on Radiation Processing; 2006 Feb 26-Mar 3; Kuala Lumpur. Swindon: International Irradiation Association; 2008.
  13. Farkas J, Mohacsi-Farkas C. History and future of food irradiation. Trends Food Sci Technol 2011;22:121-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.04.002
  14. Kume T, Furuta M, Todoriki S, Uenoyama N, Kobayashi Y. Quantity and economic scale of food irradiation in the world. Radioisotopes. 2009;58:25-35. https://doi.org/10.3769/radioisotopes.58.25
  15. Waltar A. Overview of non-power applications of nuclear technology. Proceedings of the World Nuclear University Summer Institute 2012; 2012 Jul 11; Oxford.
  16. Lee JE, Lee CH. The effects of consumer campaign to boycott certain food produce on national economy and food security. Food Sci Ind 2011;44: 43-9.
  17. Nam HS, Kim KE, Yang JS, Ly SY. Effect of food irradiation education on food majoring college students' knowledge and acceptance of irradiated food. Korean J Diet Cult 2000;15:279-85.
  18. Yoon Y, Byun MW, Kim WJ, Kwon JH, Lee JW. Current status of food irradiation technology on quarantine of agricultural commodities. Food Sci Ind 2009;42:19-26.
  19. Kim H, Kim M. A study on the consumers' perception and acceptance toward food irradiation. Korean J Diet Cult 1998;13: 275-91.
  20. Kim H, Kim M. Consumer attitudes towards irradiated foods. J Korean Home Econ Assoc 2003;41:119-30.
  21. Malone JW Jr. Consumer willingness to purchase and to pay more for potential benefits of irradiated fresh food products. Agribusiness 1990;6:163-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6297(199003)6:2<163::AID-AGR2720060209>3.0.CO;2-J
  22. Foster A. The impact of consumer acceptance on trade in irradiated foods. Br Food J 1990;92:28-34.
  23. Han EO, Choi YS. Relation of self-efficacy and cognition of irradiated food among high school students. J Radiat Prot 2013;38:106-18. https://doi.org/10.14407/jrp.2013.38.2.106
  24. Kim MR. Study on the Management Trend of Domestic and Foreign Countries toward Food Irradiation. Cheongju: Korea Food and Drug Administration; 2004.
  25. Lee H, Lee YA. Affect heuristic in risk and benefit perception of scientific technologies. Korean J Cogn Sci 2007;18:305-24. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2007.18.3.005
  26. Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. The affect heuristic. Eur J Oper Res 2007;177:1333-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
  27. Lee YA, Lee N. Psychological dimensions of risk perception. Korean J Cogn Sci 2005;16:199-211.
  28. Fleming P, Townsend E, van Hilten JA, Spence A, Ferguson E. Expert relevance and the use of context-driven heuristic processes in risk perception. J Risk Res 2012;15:857-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.666759
  29. Clarkeburn H. A test for ethical sensitivity in science. J Moral Educ 2002;31:439-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022000029662
  30. Sadler TD. Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. J Moral Educ 2004;33:339-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000733091
  31. Fowler SR, Zeidler DL, Sadler TD. Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. Int J Sci Educ 2009;31:279-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
  32. Lee M. An exploratory study on moral sensitivity measurement of Korean youths. Korean J Youth Stud 2011;18:1-20.
  33. Hodson D. Time for action: science education for an alternative future. Int J Sci Educ 2003;25:645-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
  34. Roth WM. Activism or science/technology education as byproduct of capacity building. J Act Sci Technol Educ 2009;1:16-31.
  35. National Research Council. Conceptual framework for new science education standards [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council; 2011 Jul 19 [cited 2014 Jul]. Available from: http://www7. nationalacademies.org/.
  36. Roberts DA. Scientific literacy. In: Abell SK, Lederman NG, editors. Handbook of Research on Science Education. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2007. p.729-80.
  37. Sadler TD. Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: a critical review of research. J Res Sci Teach 2004;41:513-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
  38. Zeidler DL, Keefer M. The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education. In: Zeidler DL, editor. The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. p.7-38.
  39. Zeidler DL, Sadler TD, Simmons ML, Howes EV. Beyond STS: a research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Sci Educ 2005;89:357-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
  40. Jang J, Mun J, Ryu HS, Choi K, Krajcik J, Kim SW, Korean middle school students' perceptions as global citizens of socio scientific issues. J Korean Assoc Res Sci Educ 2012;32:1124-38. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1124
  41. Han EO, Choi YS. Development of a tool to measure knowledge, attitude and behavior towards irradiated food. J Korea Acad Ind Coop Soc 2013;14:3096-101.
  42. Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980;39:806-20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806
  43. Lee JS. The effect of media modality and the valence of risk messages on affective risk perception and behavioral intention. Korean J Cogn Sci 2012;23:457-85. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2012.23.4.002
  44. Bruhn CM, Schutz HG, Sommer R. Attitude change toward food irradiation among conventional and alternative consumers. Food Technol 1986;40:86-91.
  45. Krimsky S. The role of theory in risk studies. In: Krimsky S, Golding D, editors. Social Theories of Risk. Westport (CT): Praeger Publishers; 1992. p.3-22.
  46. Honkanen P, Verplanken B. Understanding attitudes towards genetically modified food: the role of values and attitude strength. J Consum Policy 2004; 27:401-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-004-2524-9
  47. Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol 1994;49:709-24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709

Cited by

  1. Analysis of food irradiation education for elementary, middle, and high school students for three years in South Korea vol.10, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2016.10.2.237
  2. Effects of food safety education on knowledge, attitude, and practice of schoolchildren in southern Taiwan: A propensity score-matched observational study vol.124, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107360