The Korean Journal of Pain

The Korean Pain Society (대한통증학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation between Epidurographic Contrast Flow Patterns and Clinical Effectiveness in Chronic Lumbar Discogenic Radicular Pain Treated with Epidural Steroid Injections Via Different Approaches

  • Gupta, Ruchi (Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research) ;
  • Singh, Saru (Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research) ;
  • Kaur, Sukhdeep (Department of Anaesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and research) ;
  • Singh, Kulvinder (Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research) ;
  • Aujla, Kuljeet (Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research)
  • Received : 2014.04.22
  • Accepted : 2014.07.23
  • Published : 2014.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Epidural steroid injections are an accepted procedure for the conservative management of chronic backache caused by lumbar disc pathology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the epidurographic findings for the midline, transforaminal and parasagittal approaches in lumbar epidural steroid injections, and correlating them with the clinical improvement. Methods: Sixty chronic lower back pain patients with unilateral radiculitis from a herniated/degenerated disc were enrolled. After screening the patients according to the exclusion criteria and randomly allocating them to 3 groups of 20 patients, fluoroscopic contrast enhanced epidural steroids were injected via midline (group 1), transforaminal (group 2) and parasagittal interlaminar (group 3) approaches at the level of the pathology. The fluoroscopic patterns of the three groups were studied and correlated with the clinical improvement measured by the VAS over the next 3 months; any incidences of complications were recorded. Results: The transforaminal group presented better results in terms of VAS reduction than the midline and parasagittal approach groups (P < 0.05). The epidurography showed a better ventral spread for both the transforaminal (P < 0.001) and the paramedian approaches (P < 0.05), as compared to the midline approach. The nerve root filling was greater in the transforaminal group (P < 0.001) than in the other two groups. The ventral spread of the contrast agent was associated with improvement in the VAS score and this difference was statistically significant in group 1 (P < 0.05), and highly significant in groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). In all the groups, any complications observed were transient and minor. Conclusions: The midline and paramedian approaches are technically easier and statistically comparable, but clinically less efficacious than the transforaminal approach. The incidence of ventral spread and nerve root delineation show a definite correlation with clinical improvement. However, an longer follow-up period is advisable for a better evaluation of the actual outcom.

Keywords

References

  1. Mehta M, Salmon N. Extradural block. Confirmation of the injection site by X-ray monitoring. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 1009-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10558.x
  2. Botwin KP, Natalicchio J, Hanna A. Fluoroscopic guided lumbar interlaminar epidural injections: a prospective evaluation of epidurography contrast patterns and anatomical review of the epidural space. Pain Physician 2004; 7: 77-80.
  3. McLain RF, Kapural L, Mekhail NA. Epidural steroid therapy for back and leg pain: mechanisms of action and efficacy. Spine J 2005; 5: 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.10.046
  4. Candido KD, Raghavendra MS, Chinthagada M, Badiee S, Trepashko DW. A prospective evaluation of iodinated contrast flow patterns with fluoroscopically guided lumbar epidural steroid injections: the lateral parasagittal interlaminar epidural approach versus the transforaminal epidural approach. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 638-44. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181605e9b
  5. Rosenberg SK, Grabinsky A, Kooser C, Boswell MV. Effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injections in low back pain: a one year experience. Pain Physician 2002; 5: 266-70.
  6. Vad VB, Bhat AL, Lutz GE, Cammisa F. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a prospective randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 11-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200201010-00005
  7. Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Smith HS. Systematic review of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician 2009; 12: 233-51.
  8. Furman MB, Lee TS, Mehta A, Simon JI, Cano WG. Contrast flow selectivity during transforaminal lumbosacral epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician 2008; 11: 855-61.
  9. Rados I, Sakic K, Fingler M, Kapural L. Efficacy of interlaminar vs transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic unilateral radicular pain: prospective, randomized study. Pain Med 2011; 12: 1316-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01213.x
  10. Lutz GE, Vad VB, Wisneski RJ. Fluoroscopic transforaminal lumbar epidural steroids: an outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1362-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90228-3
  11. Smith CC, Booker T, Schaufele MK, Weiss P. Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroid injections for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Med 2010; 11: 1511-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00932.x
  12. Botwin K, Natalicchio J, Brown LA. Epidurography contrast patterns with fluoroscopic guided lumbar transforaminal epidural injections:a prospective evaluation. Pain Physician 2004; 7: 211-5.
  13. Choi YK, Barbella JD. Evaluation of epidurographic contrast patterns with fluoroscopic-guided lumbar interlaminar ventral epidural injection. Pain Pract 2009; 9: 275-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00283.x
  14. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, Damron KS, McManus CD. Evaluation of lumbar transforaminal epidural injections with needle placement and contrast flow patterns: a prospective, descriptive report. Pain Physician 2004; 7: 217-23.
  15. Desai MJ, Shah B, Sayal PK. Epidural contrast flow patterns of transforaminal epidural steroid injections stratified by commonly used final needle-tip position. Pain Med 2011; 12: 864-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01119.x
  16. Yang SC, Fu TS, Lai PL, Niu CC, Chen LH, Chen WJ. Transforaminal epidural steroid injection for discectomy candidates: an outcome study with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Chang Gung Med J 2006; 29: 93-9.

Cited by

  1. What is the Role of Epidural Injections in the Treatment of Lumbar Discogenic Pain: A Systematic Review of Comparative Analysis with Fusion vol.28, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.75
  2. CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Blood Patching of Ventral CSF Leaks by Direct Needle Placement in the Ventral Epidural Space Using a Transforaminal Approach vol.37, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4842
  3. Sufficient explanation of management affects patient satisfaction and the practice of post-treatment management in spinal pain, a multicenter study of 1007 patients vol.30, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2017.30.2.116
  4. Comparison of clinical efficacy in epidural steroid injections through transforaminal or parasagittal approaches vol.30, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2017.30.3.220
  5. Clinical efficacy of transforaminal epidural injection for management of zoster-associated pain: a retrospective analysis vol.47, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2795-2
  6. CT-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections: do needle position and degree of foraminal stenosis affect the pattern of epidural flow? vol.47, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3002-9
  7. Effect of needle type on intravascular injection in transforaminal epidural injection: a meta-analysis vol.32, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2019.32.1.39
  8. Correlation of Perfusion Index Change and Analgesic Efficacy in Transforaminal Block for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain vol.8, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010051
  9. Comparison of transforaminal verse interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with lumbosacral radicular pain: a meta-analysis of the literature vol.40, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3220-5
  10. Needle Tip Position and Bevel Direction Have No Effect in the Fluoroscopic Epidural Spreading Pattern in Caudal Epidural Injections: A Randomized Trial vol.2016, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4158291
  11. Ultrasound-guided pararadicular block using a paramedian sagittal oblique approach for managing low back pain in a pregnant woman -A case report- vol.11, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2016.11.3.291
  12. Impact of Different Approaches of Epidural Steroid Injection on Outcome of Patients Treated for Low Backache vol.11, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.204205
  13. Three Epidural Steroid Techniques vol.10, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.09.034
  14. The Effectiveness of Lumbar Transforaminal Injection of Steroid for the Treatment of Radicular Pain: A Comprehensive Review of the Published Data vol.21, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz160
  15. Infiltrations rachidiennes lombaires vol.87, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.monrhu.2019.12.006
  16. Evaluation of Contrast Flow Patterns with Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Injection: Comparison of Midline and Paramedian Approaches vol.57, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010008