Journal of Korea Planning Association (국토계획)

Korea Planning Association (대한국토도시계획학회)
권호 표지

U-City Oversea Expansion Strategy through Comparison of U-City with Smart City

유시티와 스마트시티 비교를 통한 유시티 해외진출 전략

  • Received : 2014.05.20
  • Accepted : 2014.07.07
  • Published : 2014.08.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Ubiquitous City(U-City) from Korea is competing with Smart City originated from EU and USA to dominate the ICTs based urban development market of developing country in advance. While U-City is efficiently driven through ubiquitous system in new towns, Smart City is performing via physical, intellectual and social capital in existing cities. This paper aims at suggesting the U-City oversea expansion strategy through SWOT analysis based on comparing U-City and Smart City in terms of the goal, concept, target, principal agent and system of oversea expansion strategies. This study proposed four U-City oversea expansion strategies; strengthening the U-City Head Quarter(UCHQ) in Korea, promoting the U-City Global Partnership(UCGP) between developing and developed country, achieving the U-City global standardization(UCGS) and vitalizing the U-City Mice industry(U-Mice; Meeting, Incentives, Convention, Event and Exhibition). Sustaining strategies on the basis of long-range view can realize the initiative of U-City among competitive concepts and contribute as a future locomotive to global market in post construction industry.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국토교통부

References

  1. 국토교통부, 2013. 제2차 유비쿼터스도시 종합계획 (2014-2018), 경기. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation, 2013. 2nd Ubiquitous City Comprehensive Plan, Gyeonggi.
  2. 국토해양부, 한국건설교통기술평가원, 2008. UCity 미래비전과 중장기전략 1차년도 보고서, 경기. MLTM, KAIA, 2008. The vision and Strategy of Ubiquitous City, 1st Year Report, Gyeonggi.
  3. 김성희, 강명구, 이정욱, 조경훈, 신유승, 2014. 해외 도시개발 참여확대를 위한 공공과 민간의 역할과 전략, 도시정보 386:3-20. Kim, S. H., M. K. Kang, J. W. Lee, K. H. Cho and Y. S. Shin, 2014. Role and Strategy of Public and Private Sectors to Expand the Participation to Foreign Urban Development Projects, Urban Information, 386:3-20.
  4. 서울특별시, 2012. 서울특별시 유비쿼터스도시계획, 서울. Seoul Metropolitan Government, 2012, Seoul Ubiquitous City Master Plan, Seoul.
  5. 윤상오. 2002. 전자정부 성숙도 평가모형의 개발과 적용에 관한 연구,<한국정책학회보>, 11(4): 243-271 Youn Sang-Oh, 2002. The Development and Application of eGovernment Maturity Evaluation Model, Journal of The Korea Association for Policy Studies, 11(4): 243-272
  6. 이상호, 임윤택, 송복섭, 진경일, 2009. "유시티 전략 의 경향, 철학, 비젼, 개념 특성에 관한 비교 연구." <국토계획>, 44(2):247- 258. Sang Ho Lee, Youn Taik Leem, Bok-Sup Song, Kyeong Il Chin, 2009. "Comparative Analysis on the U-City Strategies' Characteristics in Terms of Tendency, Philosophy, Vision, and Concept," Journal of Korea Planners Association, 44(2): 247-258.
  7. 한국정보화진흥원, 2013. 해외 스마트시티 열풍과 시사점, , 11:1-22 NIA, 2013. Fever and Implication of the Smart City in Foreign Countries, , 11:1-22
  8. Abramson, Mark A, and Means, Grady E, eds, 2001. E-Government 2001, Maryl and, Lanham : Rowman & Little field Publishers, INC.
  9. Coleman, Stephen, 2003, The Future of the Internet and Democracy Beyond Metaphors, Toward Policy, in OECD, Promise and Problems of E-Democracy : Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement, France, OECD Publication Service
  10. Caragliu, A; Del Bo, C. & Nijkamp, P., 2009. Smart cities in Europe, Serie Research Memoranda 0048 (VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics).
  11. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT, 2007. Smart cities - Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Final Report (www. smart-cities. eu/download/smart_cities_ final_ report.pdf), Vienna.
  12. Jung Hoon Han and Sang Ho Lee, 2013. "Planning Ubiquitous Cities for Social Inclusion," International Journal of Knowledge Based Development, 4(2):157-172 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2013.054092
  13. Jung Hoon Lee, Robert Phaal, Sang Ho Lee, 2013. An integrated service-device- technology roadmap for smart city development, Technological Forecasting & Social Change
  14. Komninos, Nicos, 2009. "Intelligent cities: towards interactive and global innovation environments," International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development (Interscience Publishers) 1(4): 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022726
  15. Komninos Nicos, 2002. Intelligent cities: innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces, London: Spon Press
  16. Nilles, J., 1985. "Teleworking from home". The information technology revolution, 202-208.
  17. OECD, 2001, Citizens as Partners, OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making, OECD.
  18. Paskaleva, K., 2009. "Enabling the smart city: The progress of e-city governance in Europe," International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4):405-422. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022730
  19. Sang Ho Lee and Jung Hoon Han, 2013. "Technology Convergence, People and Place in Ubiquitous Cities," International Journal of Knowledge Based Development, 4(2):105-108
  20. Sundramoorthy, Vasughi,(2011) "Domesticating energy-monitoring systems: Challenges and design concerns," Pervasive Computing, 10(1):20-27 https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2010.73
  21. Tan Yigitcanlar and Sang Ho Lee, 2013. Ubiquitous eco-city: a smart and sustainable urban form or a branding hoax?, Technological Forecasting & Social Change
  22. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L. E. 2010. Helping CIOs Understand "Smart City" Initiatives: Defining the Smart City, Its Drivers, and the Role of the CIO, Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research, Inc.
  23. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/partnerworld/pub/ smb/smarterplanet/forr_help_cios_und_smart_ city_initiatives.pdf