DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Assessment and Improvement of the Heritage's Disaster Risk

문화재 재난위험도 평가 및 개선방안 연구

  • Cho, Hong Seok (Research Center of History and Culture affiliated with Hyundai Industrial Policy Institute) ;
  • Seo, Hyeon Jeong (Research Center of History and Culture affiliated with Hyundai Industrial Policy Institute)
  • 조홍석 (재단법인 에이치아이정책연구원 부설 역사문화연구센터) ;
  • 서현정 (재단법인 에이치아이정책연구원 부설 역사문화연구센터)
  • Received : 2014.05.22
  • Accepted : 2014.07.03
  • Published : 2014.10.31

Abstract

This study is Gyeongsangbuk-do in government-designated heritage in the disaster management aspects and the types of disasters, organizing and analyzing items and risk assessments, by reviewing individual cultural assets of disaster management issues and ways to improve disaster for more effective prevention and countermeasures are proposed. Composition of the specific type of cultural property, subject to the cultural and natural heritage, and separated by the mobility separated from each real estate cultural heritage and the garden as a cultural asset, allowing for ease of evacuation in a disaster situation and to determine the degree theft by classified cultural property surveyed the types of disasters that can have a major disaster situation, while considering were classified into six different types(fire, storm or flood, earthquake, lightning, insects, theft and tampering). And significant influence factors that can affect the cultural property, which causes the external factors(threats) and internal factors(vulnerable factors) divided by each step disaster(disaster causes, types of disasters, disaster, depending on the damage) that can affect the strengths(complementary elements) and weaknesses(risks) for detailed regulations and checks and measures to improve the status on this basis, are derived.

본 연구는 재난관리적 측면에서 문화재 및 재난 유형을 체계화하고, 분석항목 및 위험도 평가의 기준을 설정, 경상북도 소재 국가지정문화재를 대상으로 개별 문화재의 재난관리 문제점 및 개선방안을 검토함으로써 재난에 대한 보다 효과적인 예방과 대응방안을 제안하였다. 구체적으로 문화재의 유형을 조성주체에 따라 문화유산과 자연유산으로 구분하고, 이를 이동성을 기준으로 부동산문화재와 동산문화재로 각각 구분함으로써 재난상황에 대한 긴급 대피의 용이성 및 도난 위험정도를 파악할 수 있도록 분류하는 한편, 재난유형을 조사대상문화재에 미칠 수 있는 주요 재난상황을 고려하여 총 6가지(화재, 풍수해, 지진, 낙뢰, 병충해, 도난 및 훼손)로 분류하였다. 그리고, 이로 인해 문화재에 미칠 수 있는 영향인자를 크게 외부요인(위협요인)과 내부요인(취약요인)으로 나누어 각 재난단계(재난원인, 재난유형, 재난피해)에 따라 미칠 수 있는 강점(보완)요인과 약점(위험)요인에 대해 세부적으로 규정하고, 이를 기초로 현황점검 및 개선대책을 도출하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Harper Collins (2003) Collins Cobuild Advanced Learner's English Dictionary, Collins Cobuild Publishers.
  2. Hornby, A.S. (2008) Oxford Advanced Learner's English-Korean Dictionary, Oxford.
  3. Hyundai Industrial Economic Institute and Korea Knowledge Industry Institute (2012) Development of Cultural Heritage Disaster Risk Index, Cultural Heritage Administration.
  4. ICOMOS, ICCROM, IUCN and UNESCO (2010) MANAGING DISASTER RISKS, UNESCO.
  5. Kim, T.H. (2010) Management Disaster, BAEKSAN PUBLISHING.
  6. Korea Knowledge Industry Institute (2011) Research Services for the Establishment of Cultural Heritage Disaster Prevention, Gyeongsangbuk-do.
  7. Suh, H.J. and Cho, H.S. (2013) A Study on the Diagnosis of Present Condition and the Improvements Plans for Heritage Disaster Management System, Proceedings of Conference on Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation.
  8. The National Institute of the Korean Language (2011) The Korean Standard Unabridged Dictionary, The National Institute of the Korean Language.