The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Three dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution around the mandibular posterior implant during non-working movement according to the amount of cantilever

  • Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Joo (Private Practice) ;
  • Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Rae (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Jong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2014.01.27
  • Accepted : 2014.06.16
  • Published : 2014.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. In case of large horizontal discrepancy of alveolar ridge due to severe resorption, cantilevered crown is usually an unavoidable treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical criteria for the placement of the aforementioned implant crown. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The mandible model with 2 mm thick cortical bone and cancellous bone was fabricated from CT cross-section image. An external connection type implant was installed and cantilevered crowns with increasing offset of 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 mm were connected. Vertical load and $30^{\circ}$ oblique load of 300 N was applied and stress around bone and implant component was analyzed. A total of 14 cases were modeled and finite element analysis was performed using COSMOS Works (Solid works Inc, USA). RESULTS. As for the location of the vertical load, the maximum stress generated on the lingual side of the implant became larger according to the increase of offset distance. When the oblique load was applied at $30^{\circ}$, the maximum stress was generated on the buccal side and its magnitude gradually decreased as the distance of the offset load increased to 5 mm. After that point, the magnitude of implant component's stress increased gradually. CONCLUSION. The results of this study suggest that for the patient with atrophied alveolar ridge following the loss of molar teeth, von-Mises stress on implant components was the lowest under the $30^{\circ}$ oblique load at the 5 mm offset point. Further studies for the various crown height and numbers of occusal points are needed to generalize the conclusion of present study.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  3. Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:85-97.
  4. Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:581-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90084-X
  5. Williams KR, Watson CJ, Murphy WM, Scott J, Gregory M, Sinobad D. Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants. Quintessence Int 1990; 21:563-70.
  6. van Steenberghe D. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:217-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8
  7. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  8. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:143-52. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070208.x
  9. Payant L, Williams JE, Zwemer JD. Survey of dental implant practice. J Oral Implantol 1994;20:50-8.
  10. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, Bolender C, Folmer T, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Laney WR, Linden U. Osseointegrated Implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:627-35.
  11. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-59.
  12. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  13. Atwood DA, Coy WA. Clinical, cephalometric, and densitometric study of reduction of residual ridges. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:280-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90070-9
  14. Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, Harnett J, Jemt T, Johns RB, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, et al. Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow- up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10: 33-42.
  15. Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, Miyakawa O. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:82-90.
  16. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:326-34.
  17. Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Anand SC, Schuessler R. Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants. J Dent Res 1976; 55:772-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345760550051001
  18. Baik SH, Heo SJ. A three dimensional finite element analysis of stress distributions in implant-retained mandibular dentures with various retainers. Doctor›s Thesis, Seoul National University, 2008.
  19. Kenney R, Richards MW. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:559-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70032-0
  20. Benzing UR, Gall H, Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:188-98.
  21. Lum LB, Osier JF. Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: an analysis using statics. Part one: Horizontal loading. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:343-8.
  22. Sertgoz A, Guvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76: 165-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90301-7
  23. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, Ohyama T. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:234-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.12.017
  24. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002;30:41-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00057-4
  25. Lum LB, Osier JF. Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: an analysis using statics. Part two: Axial loading. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:349-53.
  26. Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant- supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:19-31.
  27. Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Gilat A. Use of an axisymmetric finite element method to compare maxillary bone variables for a loaded implant. J Prosthodont 1993;2:183-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00405.x
  28. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4: 241-7.
  29. Misch CE. Available bone and dental implant treatment plans. In Micsh CE (ed): Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd eds. St Louis; MO; Mosby; 1999, p. 178-99.
  30. Richter EJ, Orschall B, Jovanovic SA. Dental implant abutment resembling the two-phase tooth mobility. J Biomech 1990;23:297-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90057-A
  31. Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983;62:155-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620021401
  32. Lavernia CJ, Cook SD, Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ. An analysis of stresses in a dental implant system. J Biomech 1981;14: 555-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(81)90005-1

Cited by

  1. 비생리적인 최대교두감합위의 교합재구성을 통한 수정 vol.31, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2015.31.3.273
  2. Effect of peri‐implant bone resorption on mechanical stress in the implant body: In vivo measured load‐based finite element analysis vol.47, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13097
  3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of buccally cantilevered implant-supported prostheses in a severely resorbed mandible vol.13, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.12