DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A New Multi-site Test for System-on-Chip Using Multi-site Star Test Architecture

  • Han, Dongkwan (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Yong (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kang, Sungho (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2013.05.13
  • Accepted : 2013.09.16
  • Published : 2014.04.01

Abstract

As the system-on-chip (SoC) design becomes more complex, the test costs are increasing. One of the main obstacles of a test cost reduction is the limited number of test channels of the ATE while the number of pins in the design increases. To overcome this problem, a new test architecture using a channel sharing compliant with IEEE Standard 1149.1 and 1500 is proposed. It can significantly reduce the pin count for testing a SoC design. The test input data is transmitted using a test access mechanism composed of only input pins. A single test data output pin is used to measure the sink values. The experimental results show that the proposed architecture not only increases the number of sites to be tested simultaneously, but also reduces the test time. In addition, the yield loss owing to the proven contact problems can be reduced. Using the new architecture, it is possible to achieve a large test time and cost reduction for complex SoC designs with negligible design and test overheads.

Keywords

References

  1. Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), 2010.
  2. D. Gizopoulos, Advances in Electronic Testing, Springer, 2006, ISBN 0-387-29409-0.
  3. M. Banga, N. Rahagude, and M.S. Hsiao, "Design-for-Test Methodology for Non-Scan at-Speed Testing," Proc. Conf. DATE, Grenoble, France, Mar. 14-18, 2011, pp. 1-6.
  4. M. Kume et al., "Programmable at-Speed Array and Functional BIST for Embedded DRAM LSI," Proc. Int. Test Conf., Charlotte, NC, USA, Oct. 26-28, 2004.
  5. R.D. Adams et al., "An Integrated Memory Self Test and EDA Solution," Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Memory, Technol., Des., Test, San Jose, CA, USA, Aug. 9-10, 2004, pp. 92-95.
  6. C.-W. Lin et al., "Fault Models and Test Methods for Subthreshold SRAMs," IEEE Int. Test Conf., Ausin, TX, USA, Nov. 2-4, 2010, pp. 1-10.
  7. M. Kassab et al., "Dynamic Channel Allocation for Higher EDT Compression in SoC Designs," IEEE Int. Test Conf., Ausin, TX, USA, Nov. 2-4, 2010, pp. 1-10.
  8. J. Rajski et al., "Embedded Deterministic Test," IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst., vol. 23, no. 5, May 2004, pp. 776-792. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2004.826558
  9. H. Tang, S.M. Reddy, and I. Pomeranz, "On Reducing Test Data Volume and Test Application Time for Multiple Scan Chain Designs," Proc. Int. Test Conf., Charlotte, NC, USA, Sept. 28 - Oct. 3, 2003, pp. 1079-1088.
  10. S. Mitra and K.S. Kim, "X-Compact: An Efficient Response Compaction Technique for Test Cost Reduction," Proc. Int. Test Conf., Baltimore, MD, USA, Oct. 7-10, 2002, pp. 311-320.
  11. A. Chandra and K. Chakrabarty, "Test Data Compression for System-on-a-Chip Using Golomb Codes," Proc. IEEE VLSI Test Symp., 2000, pp. 113-120.
  12. S.E. Oakland, "Combining IEEE Standard 1149.1 with Reduced-Pin-Count Component Test," Proc. VLSI Test Symp., Atlantic City, NJ, USA, Apr. 15-17, 1991, pp. 78-84.
  13. A.H. Baba and K.S. Kim, "Framework for Massively Parallel Testing at Wafer and Package Test," Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Des., Lake Tahoe, CA, USA, Oct. 4-7, 2009, pp. 328-334.
  14. S.K. Goel and E.J. Marinissen, "On-Chip Test Infrastructure Design for Optimal Multi-site Testing of System Chips," Proc. Conf. DATE, Munich, Germany, Mar. 7-11, 2005, pp. 44-49.
  15. S.K. Goel and E.J. Marinissen, "Optimisation of on-Chip Designfor-Test Infrastructure for Maximal Multi-site Test Throughput," IEE Proc. Comput., Digital Techn., vol. 152, no. 3, May 2005, pp. 442-456. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-cdt:20050046
  16. E.H. Volkerink et al., "Test Economics for Multi-site Test with Modern Cost Reduction Techniques," Proc. IEEE VLSI Test Symp., 2002, pp. 411-416.
  17. J.-F. Li et al., "A Hierarchical Test Methodology for Systems on Chip," IEEE Micro, vol. 22, no. 5, 2002, pp. 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1109/MM.2002.1044301
  18. J. Jahangiri et al., "Achieving High Test Quality with Reduced Pin Count Testing," Proc. Asian Test Symp., Kolkata, India, Dec. 18-21, 2005, pp. 312-317.
  19. IEEE Computer Society Test Technology Technical Committee, "IEEE Standard Test Access Port and Boundary-Scan Architecture," IEEE Standard 1149.1, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, Jan. 1990.
  20. IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Standard Testability Method for Embedded Core-Based Integrated Circuits, Aug. 29, 2005.
  21. D.-K. Han, Y. Lee, and S.-H. Kang, "Novel Hierarchical Test Architecture for SoC Test Methodology Using IEEE Test Standards," J. Semicond. Technol., Science, vol. 12, no. 3, Sept. 2012, pp. 293-296. https://doi.org/10.5573/JSTS.2012.12.3.293