DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perception and Satisfaction of Free Foodservice in Male Middle School Students in Chungnam

충남 일부지역 남자 중학생의 무상급식에 대한 인식 및 만족도

  • Kim, Yu-Rin (Major in Nutrition Education, Graduate School of Education, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Jin (Division of Food Science, Kongju National University) ;
  • Choi, Mi-Kyeong (Division of Food Science, Kongju National University)
  • 김유린 (공주대학교 교육대학원 영양교육전공) ;
  • 김은진 (공주대학교 식품과학부) ;
  • 최미경 (공주대학교 식품과학부)
  • Received : 2014.01.28
  • Accepted : 2014.03.31
  • Published : 2014.05.02

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to investigate perception, necessity, and satisfaction of a free foodservice in male middle school students. This study was conducted at male middle schools with paid foodservice (PFS group, 250 students) and with free foodservice (FFS group, 250 students) in Chungnam. Average age of students in the PFS group was 13.1 while that of FFS students was 12.8 years. Exactly 88% of PFS students and 94% of FFS students responded that school foodservice is necessary, which was a significant difference (P<0.05). As the reason for participating in foodservice, about 32% of the PFS students answered the school's request while 33.6% of FFS students answered nutrition, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). Exactly 72.8% of PFS and 96.4% of FFS knew about FFS (P<0.001). More PFS students (86.4%) than FFS students (66%) answered they would not participate in foodservice if the FFS would be introduced and the quality of meal service would deteriorate. After initiation to FFS, there were significant differences in assessment of foodservice: 77.6% of PFS students answered expected that the quality of foodservice would degrade, whereas 74.4% of FFS students answered that quality would not degrade (P<0.001). Satisfaction of foodservice was 2.3 points for FFS students, which was significantly lower than the 2.5 points for PFS students (P<0.001). To sum up assessment of foodservice was positive, whereas satisfaction was not significantly different between PFS and FFS. Based on this research, households, schools, and governments should promote FFS in order to diminish financial pressure for students.

Keywords

References

  1. Chungbuk Research Institute (2011): Policy issue analysis. Chungbuk Research Institute. Cheongju. pp.11-17
  2. Chungnam Development Institute (2012): A research on free school lunch program and its satisfaction in Chungnam. Chungnam Development Institute. Gongju. pp.10-25
  3. Ha BU (2010): Discussion on the controversial issues of free school lunch program. Teach Political Sci Res 17(3):137-157
  4. Ha BU, Kim MS (2012): A study on the controversial issues of financial support system for school lunch service. J Korean Policy Stud 12(3):345-364
  5. Hyun GA, Lee IH (2013): Comparative analysis on perceptions of teachers and parents on the free school meals finance. Res Educ Sci 15(2):49-73
  6. Kang EH (2011): Research about free lunches and staff recognition. Masters degree thesis. Sang Ji University. pp. 66-67
  7. Kim KA, Kim SJ, Jung LH, Jeon ER (2002): Degree of satisfaction on the school foodservice among the middle school students in Gwangju and Chonnam area. Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci 18(6):579-585
  8. Kim MH (2012): Survey of satisfaction and perception of middle school students and their parents on the free school meal in rural area of Changwon. Masters degree thesis. Gyungnam University. pp.115-117
  9. Lee GJ (2009): Free lunches for parliamentary policy debate kit. Korean Political Sci Assoc 8(1):27-31
  10. Lee KH, Park ES (2010): School food service satisfaction and menu preferences of high school students: focused on Iksan, Cheonbuk. Korean J Community Nutr 15(1):108-123
  11. Lee SH (2011): Perception of the free lunch service system in elementary and middle school. Masters degree thesis. Chungbuk National University. pp.54-56
  12. Ministry of Education. A course of study for elementary and middle school. Available from: http://www.moe.go.kr/web/45859/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=294&boardSeq=50325. Accessed September 9, 2013
  13. Ministry of Education and Human Development (2000): School lunch program to support needy students. Ministry of Education and Human Development. Seoul. pp.3-12
  14. Oh YM, Kim MH, Sung CJ (2006): The study of satisfaction, meal preference and improvement on school lunch program of middle school boys and girls in Jeonju. Korean J Dietetic Assoc 12(4):358-368
  15. Park JY, Kim EJ, Kim MH, Choi MK (2012): Comparison of meal satisfaction, dietary habits, and nutrient intakes according to school lunch support among middle school boys and girls in Incheon. J Korean Diet Assoc 18(1):1-15 https://doi.org/10.14373/JKDA.2012.18.1.001
  16. Song HJ, Moon HK (2010): Comparing school lunch program served at dining room with program at classroom for sanitation and contentment at one middle school. Korean J Community Nutr 15(3):369-378
  17. The Korean Dietetic Association (2007): Foodservice management manual 2. The Korean Dietetic Association. Seoul. pp.57-107
  18. Yang IS, Yi BS, Park MK, Baek SH, Chung YS, Jeong JY, Kim YJ, Kim HY (2013): Evaluation of the quality attribute and satisfaction on school foodservice in 2010. Korean J Community Nutr 18(5):491-504 https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2013.18.5.491
  19. Yang SI (2013): An analysis on the conflict of local welfare policy surrounding selectivism and universalism : focused on the free school meals policy of Seoul. Korea Res Local Admin 27(1):125-154
  20. Yoon HS (2012): The limitation, product, and prospect of dispute over universal welfare policies in Korea. Korean Soc Secur Stud 28(4):75-104

Cited by

  1. Perceptions of school meal services of middle school students and dieticians/dietetic teachers in Gwangju area according to the conversion of free meal services vol.48, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2015.48.1.113
  2. Evaluation of Perception and Foodservice Satisfaction of Free School Meals by Elementary School Students in Busan vol.45, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.12.1830
  3. Improving Perception and Satisfaction on Middle and High School Foodservice: The Role of Student Participation Program in Serving School Meals vol.23, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2018.23.3.243