DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structural damage identification with power spectral density transmissibility: numerical and experimental studies

  • Li, Jun (Department of Civil Engineering, Curtin University) ;
  • Hao, Hong (Department of Civil Engineering, Curtin University) ;
  • Lo, Juin Voon (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, The University of Western Australia)
  • Received : 2014.02.05
  • Accepted : 2014.05.05
  • Published : 2015.01.25

Abstract

This paper proposes a structural damage identification approach based on the power spectral density transmissibility (PSDT), which is developed to formulate the relationship between two sets of auto-spectral density functions of output responses. The accuracy of response reconstruction with PSDT is investigated and the damage identification in structures is conducted with measured acceleration responses from the damaged state. Numerical studies on a seven-storey plane frame structure are conducted to investigate the performance of the proposed damage identification approach. The initial finite element model of the structure and measured acceleration measurements from the damaged structure are used for the identification with a dynamic response sensitivity-based model updating method. The simulated damages can be identified accurately without and with a 5% noise effect included in the simulated responses. Experimental studies on a steel plane frame structure in the laboratory are performed to further verify the accuracy of response reconstruction with PSDT and validate the proposed damage identification approach. The locations of the introduced damage are detected accurately and the stiffness reductions in the damaged elements are identified close to the true values. The identification results demonstrated the accuracy of response reconstruction as well as the correctness and efficiency of the proposed damage identification approach.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : Development of a Self-powered Wireless Sensor Network from Renewable Energy for Integrated Structural Health Monitoring and Diagnosis

Supported by : Australian Research Council

References

  1. Bendat, J.S. and Piersol, A.G. (1980), Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
  2. Brownjohn, J.M.W., Xia, P.Q., Hao, H. and Xia, Y. (2001), "Civil structure condition assessment by FE model updating: methodology and case studies", Finite. Elem. Anal. Des, 37(10), 761-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(00)00071-8
  3. Chopra, A.K. (2007), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, U.S.
  4. Darby, A., Blakeborough, A. and Williams, M. (2001), "Improved control algorithm for real-time substructure testing", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D, 30(3), 431-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.18
  5. Friswell, M.I. and Mottershead, J.E. (1995), Finite element model updating in structural dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  6. Hansen, P.C. (1992), "Analysis of discrete Ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve", SIAM Rev., 34(4), 561-580. https://doi.org/10.1137/1034115
  7. Huang, H., Yang, J.N. and Zhou, L. (2010), "Adaptive quadratic sum-squares error with unknown inputs for damage identification of structures", Struct. Control. Health., 17(4), 404-426.
  8. Law, S.S. and Li, J. (2010), "Updating the reliability of a concrete bridge structure based on condition assessment with uncertainties", Eng. Struct, 32(1), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.015
  9. Law, S.S., Li, J. and Ding, Y. (2011), "Structural response reconstruction with transmissibility concept in frequency domain", Mech. Syst. Signal. Process, 25(3), 952-968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.001
  10. Lei, Y., Liu, C., Jiang, Y.Q. and Mao, Y.K. (2013), "Substructure based structural damage detection with limited input and output measurements", Smart. Struct. Syst, 12(6): 619-640. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.12.6.619
  11. Lei, Y., Jiang, Y. and Xu, Z. (2012), "Structural damage detection with limited input and output measurement signals", Mech. Syst. Signal. Pr., 25, 229-243.
  12. Li, H.N., Yi, T.H., Gu, M. and Huo L.S. (2009), "Evaluation of earthquake-induced structural damages by wavelet transform", Prog. Nat. Sci, 19(4), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.09.002
  13. Li, J. and Law, S.S. (2012), "Substructural damage detection with incomplete information of the structure", J. Appl. Mech. - ASME, 79(4), 041003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005552
  14. Li, J., Law, S.S. and Ding, Y. (2012), "Substructure damage identification based on response reconstruction in frequency domain and model updating", Eng. Struct, 41, 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.035
  15. Li, J., Law, S.S. and Hao, H. (2013), "Improved damage identification in bridge structures subject to moving loads: Numerical and experimental studies", Int. J. Mech. Sci, 74, 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.05.002
  16. Li, X.Y. and Law, S.S. (2010), "Adaptive Tikhonov regularization for damage detection based on nonlinear model updating", Mech. Syst. Signal. Pr., 24(6), 1646-1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.02.006
  17. Lu, Z.R., Huang, M. and Liu, J.K. (2011), "State-space formulation for simultaneous identification of both damage and input force from response sensitivity", Smart. Struct. Syst, 8(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2011.8.2.157
  18. Lu, Z.R. and Law, S.S. (2007), "Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection", J. Sound. Vib., 303(1-2), 305-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.01.021
  19. Morton, K.W. and Mayers, D.F. (2005), Numerical solution of partial differential equations, An Introduction, (2nd Ed.), Cambridge University Press, UK.
  20. Perry, M. and Koh, C.G. (2008), "Output-only structural identification in time domain: Numerical and experimental studies", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 37(4), 517-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.769
  21. Verboven, P., Guillanume, P., Cauberghe, S., Vanlanduit, S. and Parloo, E. (2004), "Modal parameter estimation from input-output Fourier data using frequency-domain maximum likelihood identification", J. Sound. Vib., 276(3-5), 957-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.08.044
  22. Wang, D. and Haldar, A. (1997), "System identification with limited observations and without input", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 123(5), 504-511. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:5(504)
  23. Xu, B., He, J., Rovekamp, R. and Dyke, S.J. (2012), "Structural parameters and dynamic loading identification from incomplete measurements: Approach and validation", Mech. Syst. Signal. Pr., 28, 244-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.008
  24. Yan, W.J. and Ren, W.X. (2012), "Operational modal parameter identification from power spectrum density transmissibility", Comput. - Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng., 27(3), 202-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00735.x
  25. Yan, Y.J., Cheng, L., Wu, Z.Y. and Yam, L.H. (2007), "Development in vibration-based structural damage detection technique", Mech. Syst. Signal. Pr., 21(5), 2198-2211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.10.002
  26. Yang, J.N., Pan, S. and Lin, S. (2007), "Least-squares estimation with unknown excitations for damage identification of structures", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 133(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:1(12)
  27. Yi, T.H., Li, H.N. and Sun, H.M. (2013), "Multi-stage structural damage diagnosis method based on "energy-damage" theory", Smart. Struct. Syst., 12(3-4), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.12.3_4.345
  28. Yi, T.H., Li, H.N. and Zhao, X.Y. (2012), "Noise smoothing for structural vibration test signals using an improved wavelet thresholding technique", Sensors, 12(8), 11205-11220. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120811205
  29. Zhu, H.P. and Xu, Y.L. (2005), "Damage detection of mono-coupled periodic structures based on sensitivity analysis of modal parameters", J. Sound. Vib., 285(1-2), 365-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.08.012
  30. Zivanovic, S., Pavic, A. and Reynolds, P. (2007), "Finite element modeling and updating of a lively footbridge: The complete process", J. Sound. Vib., 301(1-2), 126-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.09.024

Cited by

  1. Finite element model updating using strain-based power spectral density for damage detection vol.23, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1833
  2. Structural fatigue assessment of a fixed mono-pile platform vol.8, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016679764
  3. System parameter identification from projection of inverse analysis vol.396, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.02.042
  4. First-passage probability of the deflection of a cable-stayed bridge under long-term site-specific traffic loading vol.9, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016687271
  5. Cubic Function-Based Bayesian Dynamic Linear Prediction Approach of Bridge Extreme Stress vol.2017, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7460378
  6. Canonical correlation analysis based fault diagnosis method for structural monitoring sensor networks vol.17, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.6.1031
  7. Dynamic field monitoring data analysis of an ancient wooden building in seismic and operational environments vol.11, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.6.1043
  8. An improved frequency-domain regression method for structural damage detection in wireless sensor network vol.8, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016673805
  9. Dynamic reliability prediction of bridge member based on Bayesian dynamic nonlinear model and monitored data vol.8, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016679313
  10. Optimal sensor placement for health monitoring of high-rise structure based on collaborative-climb monkey algorithm vol.54, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.2.305
  11. Damage assessment of shear connectors with vibration measurements and power spectral density transmissibility vol.54, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.2.257
  12. Multiple Pounding Tuned Mass Damper (MPTMD) control on benchmark tower subjected to earthquake excitations vol.11, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.6.1123
  13. Exploring the synergy of ECCs and SMAs in creating resilient civil infrastructure vol.70, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.17.00033
  14. Field monitoring of the train-induced hanger vibration in a high-speed railway steel arch bridge vol.17, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.6.1107
  15. Stereovision-based surface flaws detection experiment of foundations of Yiqiao Bridge vol.9, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017725484
  16. A New Transmissibility Based Indicator of Local Variation in Structure and Its Application for Damage Detection vol.2015, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/850286
  17. A review of recent research advances on structural health monitoring in Western Australia vol.3, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/smm.2016.3.1.033
  18. Fast Warning Method for Rigid Hangers in a High-Speed Railway Arch Bridge Using Long-Term Monitoring Data vol.31, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001097
  19. Damage detection by a FE model updating method using power spectral density: Numerical and experimental investigation vol.397, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.02.052
  20. Cross modal strain energy–based structural damage detection in the presence of noise effects vol.9, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017744122
  21. A new swarm intelligent optimization algorithm: Pigeon Colony Algorithm (PCA) vol.18, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.18.3.425
  22. Micro-seismic monitoring in mines based on cross wavelet transform vol.11, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.6.1143
  23. Parameter Identification for Nonlinear Structures by a Constrained Kalman Filter with Limited Input Information vol.17, pp.01, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455417500109
  24. Damage Identification in Bridges by Processing Dynamic Responses to Moving Loads: Features and Evaluation vol.19, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030463
  25. Structural damage detection based on residual force vector and imperialist competitive algorithm vol.62, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.6.709
  26. Numerical and experimental verifications on damping identification with model updating and vibration monitoring data vol.20, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.2.127
  27. Outlier detection of GPS monitoring data using relational analysis and negative selection algorithm vol.20, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.2.219
  28. Mechanical parameters detection in stepped shafts using the FEM based IET vol.20, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.4.473
  29. A structural model updating method using incomplete power spectral density function and modal data vol.68, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.68.1.039
  30. Structural damage identification using cloud model based fruit fly optimization algorithm vol.67, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.3.245
  31. Anti-sparse representation for structural model updating using l norm regularization vol.75, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.75.4.477
  32. Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019 vol.491, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741
  33. Vibration-based method for story-level damage detection of the reinforced concrete structure vol.27, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2021.27.1.029
  34. Detecting structural damage under unknown seismic excitation by deep convolutional neural network with wavelet-based transmissibility data vol.20, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720923081
  35. High‐performance vibration isolation technique using passive negative stiffness and semiactive damping vol.36, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12681
  36. A Multi-State Strategy for Structural Damage Detection Using Sensitivity of Weighted Transmissibility Function vol.21, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455421501443
  37. Damage detection of bridges based on combining efficient cepstral coefficients vol.27, pp.19, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546320958348
  38. Scavenging energy from a vibrating building using distributed electromagnetic energy harvesters with nonlinear circuits vol.32, pp.18, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x21990884
  39. Equivalent circuit model of eddy current damping regarding frequency-dependence with test validation vol.25, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332211050989