Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society

The Korean Data and Information Science Society (한국데이터정보과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of the parent's socioeconomic status and the private education expenditure to the academic achievement

부모의 사회경제적 지위와 사교육비가 학업성취도에 미치는 효과 분석

  • Received : 2014.11.18
  • Accepted : 2015.01.10
  • Published : 2015.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of the parent's socioeconomic status to the academic achievement, together with the mediation effect of the private education expenditure. The structural equation modeling (SEM) method is used with the survey of private education expenditures data collected by Statistics Korea in 2011. In SEM, the multi-group effect is also analyzed for gender, region and school level. The analysis results show that the high socioeconomic status of parent tends to increase the private education expenditures but does not affect the academic achievement, and there are the significant multi-group effect for gender, region, and school level.

이 연구의 목적은 통계청에서 실시한 2011년도 사교육비 조사의 자료를 이용하여 학생의 학업성취도, 가정의 사회경제적 지위, 보완 사교육비, 일반 사교육비 사이의 효과를 구조방정식 모형을 이용하여 분석하고, 이러한 구조적 효과가 성, 지역, 학교급 집단 별로 유의한 차이가 있는지 다중집단 구조방정식을 활용하여 확인하는 것이다. 연구 모형의 분석 결과를 바탕으로, 사회경제적 지위가 높을수록 사교육에 대한 지출이 커지는 경향이 있지만 학업성취도에는 영향을 미치지 않는다는 결론을 얻을 수 있다. 또한 성, 지역, 학교 집단 모두 학생의 학업성취도, 부모의 사회경제적 지위, 사교육비의 집단 간 구조적 효과의 차이가 있다는 결론을 얻을 수 있다. 이 연구를 통해 우리나라 교육 현상 중에서 학업에 대한 열의가 사교육으로 많이 집중되어 나타나는 사교육 문제에 있어 학생의 학업성취도, 부모의 사회경제적 지위와 사교육비가 연관되어 있을 것이라는 사회적 통념을 2011년 사교육비 조사자료를 이용하여 판단할 수 있을 것이라고 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). Ibm spss amos 20 user's guide, IBM Corporation, Crawfordville.
  2. Bae, B. R. (2006). (Lisrel) structural equation modeling, 2nd Ed., Chungram, Seoul.
  3. Bae. B. R. (2011). Structural equation modeling with amos 19: Principles and practice, 2nd Ed., Chungram, Seoul.
  4. Park, C. N. and Do, J. S. (2005). The effects of parent's socio-economic status on academic achievement. Social Welfare Policy, 22, 281-303.
  5. Bentler, P. M. and Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods Research, 16, 78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
  6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables, Wiley, New York.
  7. Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with Lisrel: Essentials and advances, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  8. Hong, S. W. and Sung, N. I. (2008). An empirical study on the korean household expenditure for private tutoring. Korea Review of Applied Economics, 10, 183-212.
  9. Hyun, J., Lee, J. B. and Lee, H. Y. (2003). A Study on the educational fever of Korean parents, Korean Educational Development Institute, Seoul.
  10. Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the n:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6
  11. Kang, S. H. and Lim, B. I. (2012). An analysis on determinants of the private education expenses from a viewpoint of housewives. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 23, 543-558. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2012.23.3.543
  12. Kim, E. J. (2007). A study on the social economic status of the family, extra tutoring fee, parent-child relationship and children's educational achievement. Korean Journal of Sociology, 41, 134-162.
  13. Kim, G. S (2009). Latent growth modeling and structural equation model analysis, Hannarae, Seoul.
  14. Kim, K. K. (2000). Social capital within a family and children's academic achievement. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 10, 21-40.
  15. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd Ed., Guilford, New York.
  16. Lee, K. J. (2000). Structural equation model, Kyoyookbook, Seoul.
  17. Lei, P. W. and Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x
  18. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J. and Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 58, 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
  19. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G. and Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods, 7, 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
  20. Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Developing learners, 5th Ed., Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
  21. Ro, H. K. (2006). Analyzing the structural relationships among parent factors, student factors, and private tutoring expense. The Journal of Educational Administration, 24, 97-118.
  22. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36.
  23. Statistic Korea. (2012), The survey of private education expenditures (2011), Statistic Korea, Daejeon.
  24. Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03
  25. Yu, J. P. (2012). The basics and interpretation of structural equation modeling, Hannarae, Seoul.

Cited by

  1. A case study on correlations between college life satisfaction and achievement during freshmen year vol.26, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2015.26.6.1283
  2. An analysis of determinants of individual's pension purchase using structural equation model vol.27, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2016.27.2.437
  3. 경시적 자료를 이용한 아동 학업성취도 분석 vol.28, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2017.28.1.1
  4. 학교급별 학업성취도에 대한 사교육 효과: 성향점수매칭을 중심으로 vol.29, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2018.29.4.961
  5. Examining a causal effect of private tutoring in Korea: does private tutoring damage students’ self-regulated learning? vol.20, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9570-5