DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Optimum Contrast Medium Quantity during Abdominal CT using Dual Energy Technique

복부 CT 검사 시 이중에너지 기법을 통한 적정한 조영제 양에 관한 연구

  • 강민 (동신대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 최남길 (동신대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 한재복 (동신대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 김욱 (동신대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 장영일 (광양보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 송종남 (동신대학교 방사선학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.24
  • Accepted : 2015.01.25
  • Published : 2015.01.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is finding optimum contrast medium quantity during abdominal CT using dual energy technique. The study subjects are 30 patients who had received general single energy abdominal CT and received double energy technique follow-up abdominal CT. dual energy technique abdominal CT images were obtained after setting contrast medium quantities at 30%, 40%, 50%, 60% and 70% of contrast medium quantity at the time of single energy technique. Then the contrast enhancement (Hounsfield Unit; HU) was estimated by setting-up the regions of interest at aorta, inferior vena cava, hepatic portal vein and hepatic parenchymal. The obtained values were compared to the values of the same parts measured during single energy technique abdominal CT. The results of the study were as following. The 60% set up group had HU in aorta : $210.80{\pm}13.609$, IVC : $190.40{\pm}25.215$, hepatic portal vein : $198.40{\pm}21.232$ and hepatic parenchymal : $119.20{\pm}7.98$, The single energy abdomianl CT images had HU in aorta : $205.40{\pm}16.426$, IVC : $188.20{\pm}21.476$, hepatic portal vein : $195.40{\pm}22.744$ and hepatic parenchymal : $121.00{\pm}6.595$. Therefore, it is possible to obtain contrast enhancement by dual energy technique abdominal CT similar to the same by single energy technique abdominal CT by setting-up the quantity of contrast medium at 60% of contrast medium at the time of single energy technique abdominal CT. Based on the result of this study, it is possible to decrease existing quantity of contrast medium by _% and the injection velocity can be also decreased. Accordingly, it is believed that the result of study would be quite useful for patients who have renal function disorder, weak vein or side effect of contrast medium in the past.

이중에너지 기법을 이용한 복부 CT 검사에서 적정한 조영제 양에 대하여 알아보고자 하였다. 일반적인 단일에너지 복부 CT 검사를 시행했던 환자들 중 이중에너지 기법을 이용하여 추적검사를 시행한 30명을 대상으로 하였다. 단일에너지 복부 검사에서 사용했던 조영제 양 대비 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%로 각각 설정하여 영상을 획득한 후 대동맥, 하대정맥, 간문맥, 간실질에 관심영역을 설정하여 조영증강정도(hounsfield unit; HU)를 구하여 단일에너지에서 측정된 부위와의 값을 비교 분석하였다. 그 결과 기존대비 60%로 조영제를 설정한 군에서는 대동맥 HU : $210.80{\pm}13.609$, 하대정맥 HU : $190.40{\pm}25.215$, 간문맥 $198.40{\pm}21.232$, 간실질 HU : $119.20{\pm}7.98$로 각각 측정되었으며. 단일에너지 복부 CT 검사는 대동맥 HU : $205.40{\pm}16.426$, 하대정맥 HU : $188.20{\pm}21.476$, 간문맥 HU : $195.40{\pm}22.744$, 간실질 HU : $121.00{\pm}6.595$ 이었다. 따라서 이중에너지를 이용하여 복부 조영 CT검사를 시행할 때 조영제의 양을 60%로 설정한 후 검사하는 것이 각 장기에서의 단일에너지 조영검사시와 비슷한 조영증강정도를 획득할 수 있어 기존 조영제 양의 감소와 동시에 조영제를 낮은 속도로 주입할 수 있어 신장기능 저하환자, 정맥혈관이 약한 환자, 과거 조영제 부작용이 있었던 환자에게 유용한 검사라 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), 2008 report to the General Assembly, annex on medical exposures, New York, 2010.
  2. M. J. Shin, Y. J. Cho. "Management of adverse reaction to iodinated radiocontrast media", J Korean Med Association, Vol.55, No.8, pp.779-790, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.8.779
  3. Christiansen C. "X-ray contrast media -an overview Toxicology", Vol.209, No.1, pp.185-187, 2005.
  4. K. E. Jung, "A Clinical of Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Nonionic Contrast Media", Dankook University Graduate school, 2010.
  5. Martin retersilka, Herbert Bruder, Benrnhard Krauss, et al. Technical principles of dual source CT. European Journal of Radiology, Vol.68, No.1, pp.362-368. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.013
  6. Lin X.Z., Miao F, Li J.Y, Dong H.P, Shen Y, Chen K.M, "High-Definition CT Gemstone Spectral imaging of the Brain; Initial Rusults of Selecting Optimal Monochromatic image for Beam-Hardning Artifacts and Image Noise Reduction", Journal of computer assisted tomography, Vol.35, No.2, pp.294-297, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182058d5c
  7. Christiansen C. "X-ray contrast media: an overview. Toxicology", Vol.209, No.1, pp.185-187, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2004.12.020
  8. Lieberman PL, Seigle RL. "Reactions to radiocontrast material. Anaphylactoid evens in radiology. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol", Vol.17, No.4, pp.469-496, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737651
  9. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. "Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the japanese Committee on the safely of Contrast Media", Radiology, Vol.175, No.3, pp.621-628, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343107
  10. J. H. Lee, S. E. Baek, S. B. Lee, Y. H. Kim, "Usefulness of Three-Dimensional CT Image in Meningioma Using Contrast Method" The Korean Society of Radiology, Vol.2. No.1, pp.17-21, 2008.
  11. Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M, Staehler M, Haseke N, Nikolaou K, et al. "Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience". Invest Radiol Vol.43, No.1, pp.112-119, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e318157a144

Cited by

  1. A Convergence Study on effectiveness of contrast agent reduction by normal saline solution dilution in the computed tomography of arteries of lower limb vol.13, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.9.431