DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Inorganic Admixture for Magnesia Cement Using MgCO3 and Serpentine

MgCO3와 사문석을 사용한 마그네시아 시멘트의 무기 첨가제 영향

  • Lee, Jong-Kyu (Energy & Environment Div. Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Ceramic Eng. & Tech.) ;
  • Soh, Jung-Sub (Energy & Environment Div. Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Ceramic Eng. & Tech.)
  • 이종규 (한국세라믹기술원 에너지환경소재본부) ;
  • 소정섭 (한국세라믹기술원 에너지환경소재본부)
  • Received : 2014.11.20
  • Accepted : 2015.01.02
  • Published : 2015.02.27

Abstract

The carbon dioxide($CO_2$) released while producing building materials is substantial and has been targeted as a leading contributor to global climate change. One of the most typical method to reducing $CO_2$ for building materials is the addition of slag and fly ash, like pozzolan material, while another method is reducing $CO_2$ production by carbon negative cement development. The MgO-based cement was from the low-temperature calcination of magnesite required less energy and emitted less $CO_2$ than the manufacturing of Portland cements. It is also believed that adding reactive MgO to Portland-pozzolan cements could improve their performance and also increase their capacity to absorb atmospheric $CO_2$. In this study, the basic research for magnesia cement using $MgCO_3$ and magnesium silicate ore (serpentine) as main starting materials, as well as silica fume, fly ash and blast furnace slag for the mineral admixture, were carried out for industrial waste material recycling. In order to increase the hydration activity, $MgCl_2$ was also added. To improve hydration activity, $MgCO_3$ and serpentinite were fired at $700^{\circ}C$ and autoclave treatment was conducted. In the case of $MgCO_3$ as starting material, hydration activity was the highest at firing temperature of $700^{\circ}C$. This $MgCO_3$ was completely transferred to MgO after firing. This occurred after the hydration reaction with water MgO was transferred completely to $Mg(OH)_2$ as a hydration product. In the case of using only $MgCO_3$, the compressive strength was 3.5MPa at 28 days. The addition of silica fume enhanced compressive strength to 5.5 MPa. In the composition of $MgCO_3$-serpentine, the addition of pozzolanic materials such as silica fume increased the compression strength. In particular, the addition of $MgCl_2$ compressive strength was increased to 80 MPa.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Schneider, M. Romer, M. Tschudin and H. Bolio, Cem. Concr. Res., 41(7), 642 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019
  2. J. Harder, Zement-Kalk-Gips, 59(2), 58 (2006).
  3. Ashok Santra and Ronald Sweatman, Energy Procedia, 4, 5243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.503
  4. B. Kolani, L. Buffo-Lacarrière, A. Sellier, G. Escadeillas, L. Boutillon and L. Linger, Cem. Concr. Compos., 34(9), 1009 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.05.007
  5. B Uzal and L Turanli, Cem. Concr. Res., 33(11), 1777 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00173-X
  6. L. Turanli, B. Uzal and F. Bektas, Cem. Concr. Res., 34(12), 2277 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.011
  7. J. Temuujin, A. van Riessen and K. J. D. MacKenzie, Constr. Build. Mater., 24(10), 1906 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.012
  8. Tawatchai Tho-in, Vanchai Sata, Prinya Chindaprasirt and Chai Jaturapitakkul, Constr. Build. Mater., 30(5), 366 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.028
  9. Daniel L.Y. Kong and Jay G. Sanjayan, Cem. Concr. Res., 40(2), 334 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.017
  10. Ebrahim Najafi Kani, Ali Allahverdi and John L. Provis, Cem. Concr. Compos., 34(1), 25 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.07.007
  11. Ellis M. Gartner and Donald E. Macpee, Cem. Concr. Res., 41, 736 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.006
  12. L. J. Vandeperre, M. Liska and A. Al-Tabbaa, Cem. Concr. Compos., 30(8), 706 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.05.002
  13. M. Liska and A. Al-Tabbaa, Constr. Build. Mater., 22(8), 1789 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.05.007
  14. Emmanuel Soudee and Jean Pera, Cem. Concr. Res., 32(1), 153 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00647-0
  15. Quanbing Yang, Beirong Zhu, Shuqing Zhang and Xueli Wu, Cem. Concr. Res., 30(11), 1807 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00419-1
  16. P. Frantzis and R. Baggott, Cem. Concr. Res., 27(8) 1155 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00126-9