The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on School Mathematics Field Trips for Teaching & Learning Method in Mathematics Education

수학 교수·학습을 위한 '학교수학답사'의 개념 탐색

  • Received : 2014.11.18
  • Accepted : 2015.01.30
  • Published : 2015.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

School Math Field Trips(SMFT) for School Mathematics can be defined as teaching and learning activity of mathematics going into the field of Korean history, culture, science and technology. This is a literature analysis study to systemize teaching and learning method of mathematics based on literature analysis and real SMFT activity. First, SMFT was introduced to improve cognitive affective and cultural-mathematical teaching and learning method of mathematics. Second, SMFT has three purposes of cognitive, affective and cultural-mathematical. Third, to conduct mathematical education activity the direction of teaching was set. Forth, the progressing way of developing material and SMFT was researched. Fifth, developing the evaluation standard of SMFT and evaluation method was suggested.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부 (2011). 2009 개정교육과정에 따른 수학교육과정, 서울: 교육과학기술부.(The Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). 2009 Reformed mathematics curriculum, Seoul: MEST.)
  2. 박승재, 최재혁 (2004). 수원 화성 과학 탐방을 통한 문화재에 대한 과학적 안목 형성 지도, 한국과학교육학회지 24(5), 930-936.(Park, S. J. & Choi, J. H (2004). The development of students' scientific perspectives on historical heritages through the science field trip of hwasong fortress, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 24(5), 930-936.)
  3. 수학동아 (2013). 수학자신감 회복 프로젝트! 수학클리닉, 덕수궁으로 떠나는 매스투어, 아는 만큼 보인다, 수학동아 2013년 9월호, 84-87.(Math dong-a (2013). Math confidence restored project! Math clinic, go to the Deuk-su gung for math tour, Math dong-a journal 2013(9), 84-87.)
  4. 서보억 (2013). 수학 교수.학습을 위한 '학교수학답사'의유형 탐색, 2013국제수학영재교육학술대회 프로시딩, 107-111.(Suh, B. E (2013). A school math tour type discovery for mathematics teaching and learning, Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on mathematics education, 107-111.)
  5. 신현용 (2010). 수학여행 수학여행 1, 2, 3, 4. 한국수학교육학회 뉴스레터. 126, 127, 128, 129호. 한국수학교육학회.(Shin, H. Y. (2010). Math tour 1, 2, 3, 4, Korea society of mathematical education news letter, No. 126-129.)
  6. 신현용, 서보억, 이경언, 최수현, 나준영, 윤민지, 최명숙, 문태선, 박병주, 조세연 (2010). 수학여행 수학여행, ICME-12문화특별위원회.(Shin, H. Y., Suh, B. E., Lee, K. Y., Choi, S. H., Na, J. Y., Yoon, M. J., Choi, M. S., Moon, T. S., Park, B. J. & Jo, S. Y. (2010). Math tour, ICME-12 Culture Committee.)
  7. 신현용, 서보억, 최명숙, 박병주 (2011). 수학여행 수학여행2, ICME-12문화특별위원회.(Shin, H. Y., Suh, B. E., Choi, M. S. & Park, B. J. (2011). Math tour 2, ICME-12 Culture Committee.)
  8. 우정호 (2006). 수학 학습-지도 원리와 방법, 서울: 서울대학교출판부.(Woo, J. H. (2006). Mathematics instructional principles and methods. Seoul: SNU press.)
  9. 윤혜경 (1998). 한국 역사 속 과학 탐방의 실제 지도 방안, 과학교육자 큰 모임, 한국과학교육단체총연합회.(Yoon, H. K. (1998). Science teaching methods through the science field trip, The Korean federation of science education societies.)
  10. 이면우 (1998). 한국 과학사와 과학교육, 과학 교육자 큰 모임, 한국과학교육단체총연합회(Lee, M. W. (1998). History of science and science education in Korea, The Korean federation of science education societies.)
  11. 이정원 (1998). 영릉과학탐방을 통한 중학생들의 문화재에 대한 개방적 탐구활동 분석, 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.(Lee, J. W. (1998). An analys is of junior high school students' open-ended investigation into cultural assets through the science field trip in Young-nung, Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University.)
  12. 이종우 (2002). 기하학의 역사적 배경과 발달, 서울 : 경문사.(Lee, J. W. (2002). History of geometry and development, Seoul: Kyungmoon co.)
  13. 전영석 (1998). 고인쇄 박물관 과학 탐방의 지도와 평가, 한국 역사 속 과학 탐방 교육, 한국과학교육단체총연합회(Jeun, Y. S. (1998). A teaching and evaluation through the science field trip in Korea old printing museum, The Korean federation of science education societies.)
  14. 최재혁 (1999). 화성과학 탐방을 통한 문화재에 대한 과학적 안목 형성 지도, 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.(Choi, J. H. (1999). The development of students' scientific perspectives for cultural heritages through the science field trip of Hwasong fortress, Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University.)
  15. Boyd (1986). The significance of significance in cultural heritage studies : a role for cultural analogues in applied geography teaching. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 20(3), 295-304 https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269608709374
  16. Cross, P. K. (1998). Why learning communities? Why now?, About Campus 3(3), 4-11.
  17. Ericksen, D. & Marchinek, T. (2012). Important dates and historical places as motivators for studying historical aspects of mathematical Ideals: The end of the world and Maya mathematics, ICME-12 Poster Session Proceeding.
  18. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  19. Kuntz, J. J.(Jeffrey J. Kuntz),January 2006, www.TeachingK-8.com
  20. Mangiante, E. S. (2009). Forest or Field, Science and Children, september 2009.
  21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: The Author.
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: The Author.
  23. Nesbit, S., Mayer, A. (2010). Shifting Attitude: The Influence of Field Trip Experiences on Student Beliefs, Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 4(2), 1-22.
  24. Noel, A. M., & Colopy, M. A. (2006). Making history field trips meaningful: Teachers' and site educators' perspectives on teaching materials, Theory and Research in Social Education 34(3), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2006.10473321
  25. Orion, N. & Hofstein, A. (1991). The measurement of students' attitudes towards scientific field trips, Science Education 75, 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750503
  26. Orion, N. (1993). A Model for the Development and Implementation of Field Trips as an Integral Part of the Science Curriculum, School Science and Mathematics 93(6), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1993.tb12254.x
  27. Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology, trans, E. Duckworth, New York: Columbia University Press.
  28. Rudmann, C. L. (1994). A review of the use and implementation of science field trips, School Science and Mathematics 94(30), pp.138-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1994.tb15640.x
  29. Skop, E. (2008). Creating Field Trip-Based Learning Communities, Journal of Geography 107, 230-235. (National Council for Geograpnic Education)
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, ed. M. Cole, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  31. Wilson, M (2011). Field Trip Fundamentals, http://www.eddigest.com
  32. Wilson, B., and M. Ryder. (1996). Dynamic learning communities: An alternative to designed instructional systems. Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  33. Zanetis, J. (2010). The Beginner''s Guide to Interactive, Learning & Leading with Technology, March/April 2010, ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education)

Cited by

  1. 수학 학습에 대한 긍정적 태도 신장을 위한 매쓰투어(Math-Tour) 개발 및 효과 vol.34, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.4.465