Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A REVIEW OF NEUTRON SCATTERING CORRECTION FOR THE CALIBRATION OF NEUTRON SURVEY METERS USING THE SHADOW CONE METHOD

  • KIM, SANG IN (Health Physics Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • KIM, BONG HWAN (Health Physics Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • KIM, JANG LYUL (Health Physics Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • LEE, JUNG IL (Health Physics Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • Received : 2014.11.14
  • Accepted : 2015.07.09
  • Published : 2015.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The calibration methods of neutron-measuring devices such as the neutron survey meter have advantages and disadvantages. To compare the calibration factors obtained by the shadow cone method and semi-empirical method, 10 neutron survey meters of five different types were used in this study. This experiment was performed at the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI; Daejeon, South Korea), and the calibration neutron fields were constructed using a $^{252}Californium$ ($^{252}Cf$) neutron source, which was positioned in the center of the neutron irradiation room. The neutron spectra of the calibration neutron fields were measured by a europium-activated lithium iodide scintillator in combination with KAERI's Bonner sphere system. When the shadow cone method was used, 10 single moderator-based survey meters exhibited a smaller calibration factor by as much as 3.1-9.3% than that of the semi-empirical method. This finding indicates that neutron survey meters underestimated the scattered neutrons and attenuated neutrons (i.e., the total scatter corrections). This underestimation of the calibration factor was attributed to the fact that single moderator-based survey meters have an under-ambient dose equivalent response in the thermal or thermal-dominant neutron field. As a result, when the shadow cone method is used for a single moderator-based survey meter, an additional correction and the International Organization for Standardization standard 8529-2 for room-scattered neutrons should be considered.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning

References

  1. C.M. Eisenhouer, R.B. Schwartz, R.C. McCall, Effect of air scatter on calibration of instruments for detecting neutrons, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 19 (1987) 77-84.
  2. C.M. Eisenhouer, Review of scattering corrections for calibration of neutron instruments, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 28 (1989) 253-262.
  3. H. Kluge, K. Weise, J.B. Hunt, Calibration of neutron sensitive spherical devices with bare and $D_2O$-moderated $^{252}Cf$ sources in rooms of different sizes, Rad. Prot. Dosim. 32 (1990) 233-244.
  4. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Reference Neutron Radiations-Part 2: Calibration Fundamentals of Radiation Protection Devices Related to the Basic Quantities Characterizing the Radiation Field, ISO 8529-2, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
  5. J.B. Hunt, The Calibration and Use of Long Counters for the Accurate Measurement of Neutron Flux Density, NPL Report-RS5, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom, 1976.
  6. J.B. Hunt, The calibration of neutron sensitive spherical devices, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 8 (1984) 239-251.
  7. C.M. Eisenhouer, J.B. Hunt, R.B. Schwartz, Calibration techniques for neutron personal dosimetry, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 10 (1985) 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a079410
  8. B.H. Kim, S.I. Kim, J.S. Kim, J.L. Kim, J.I. Lee, Response of several neutron measuring devices under the fractional change of thermal and fast neutrons, Radiat. Meas. 45 (2010) 1541-1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.04.007
  9. M. Reginatto, P. Goldhagen, MAXED, a computer code for maximum entropy deconvolution of multisphere neutron spectrometer data, Health Phys. 77 (1999) 579-583. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199911000-00012
  10. M. Reginatto, P. Goldhagen, S. Neumann, Spectrum unfolding, sensitivity analysis and propagation of uncertainties with the maximum entropy deconvolution code MAXED, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. A 476 (2002) 242-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)01439-5
  11. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), Conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against external radiation, ICRU Report 57, ICRU, Bethesda, MD, USA, 1998.
  12. S.I. Kim, B.H. Kim, I. Chang, J.I. Lee, J.L. Kim, A.S. Pradhan, Response of six neutron survey meters in mixed fields of fast and thermal neutrons, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 156 (2013) 518-524. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct103

Cited by

  1. Characterization of NIS neutron irradiation facility for calibration and metrological application vol.12, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2021007