DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bone cement grafting increases implant primary stability in circumferential cortical bone defects

  • Shin, Seung-Yun (Department of Periodontology, Institute of Oral Biology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Shin, Seung-Il (Department of Periodontology, Institute of Oral Biology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kye, Seung-Beom (Department of Periodontology, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chang, Seok-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Institute of Oral Biology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hong, Jongrak (Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Paeng, Jun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Yang, Seung-Min (Department of Periodontology, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2014.11.20
  • Accepted : 2014.12.24
  • Published : 2015.02.28

Abstract

Purpose: Implant beds with an insufficient amount of cortical bone or a loss of cortical bone can result in the initial instability of a dental implant. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of bone cement grafting on implant initial stability in areas with insufficient cortical bone. Methods: Two different circumferential defect depths (2.5 mm and 5 mm) and a control (no defect) were prepared in six bovine rib bones. Fourteen implants of the same type and size ($4mm{\pm}10mm$) were placed in each group. The thickness of the cortical bone was measured for each defect. After the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were measured three times in four different directions, bone cement was grafted to increase the primary stability of the otherwise unstable implant. After grafting, the ISQ values were measured again. Results: As defect depth increased, the ISQ value decreased. In the controls, the ISQ value was $85.45{\pm}3.36$ ($mean{\pm}standard$ deviation). In circumferential 2.5-mm and 5-mm defect groups, the ISQ values were $69.42{\pm}7.06$ and $57.43{\pm}6.87$, respectively, before grafting. These three values were significantly different (P<0.001). After grafting the bone cement, the ISQ values significantly increased to $73.72{\pm}8.00$ and $67.88{\pm}10.09$ in the 2.5-mm and 5.0-mm defect groups, respectively (P<0.05 and P<0.001). The ISQ value increased to more than double that before grafting in the circumferential 5-mm defect group. The ISQ values did not significantly differ when measured in any of the four directions. Conclusions: The use of bone cement remarkably increased the stability of the implant that otherwise had an insufficient level of stability at placement, which was caused by insufficient cortical bone volume.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:95-105.
  2. Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:244-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x
  3. Bayarchimeg D, Namgoong H, Kim BK, Kim MD, Kim S, Kim TI, et al. Evaluation of the correlation between insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants using a block bone test. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:30-6. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.1.30
  4. Hong J, Lim YJ, Park SO. Quantitative biomechanical analysis of the influence of the cortical bone and implant length on primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1193-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02285.x
  5. Javed F, Almas K. Osseointegration of dental implants in patients undergoing bisphosphonate treatment: a literature review. J Periodontol 2010;81:479-84. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090587
  6. Javed F, Romanos GE. Impact of diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the osseointegration of dental implants: a systematic literature review. J Periodontol 2009;80:1719-30. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090283
  7. Roze J, Babu S, Saffarzadeh A, Gayet-Delacroix M, Hoornaert A, Layrolle P. Correlating implant stability to bone structure. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1140-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01745.x
  8. Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:327-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01692.x
  9. Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:213-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01823.x
  10. Seong WJ, Kim HC, Jeong S, DeVeau DL, Aparicio C, Li Y, et al. Ex vivo mechanical properties of dental implant bone cement used to rescue initially unstable dental implants: a rabbit study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:826-36.
  11. Shin SY, Shin SI, Kye SB, Hong J, Paeng JY, Chang SW, et al. The effects of defect type and depth, and measurement direction on the implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. J Oral Implantol 2014 Jun 26 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-13-00331
  12. Park JH, Choi CG, Jeon SR, Rhim SC, Kim CJ, Roh SW. Radiographic analysis of instrumented posterolateral fusion mass using mixture of local autologous bone and b-TCP (PolyBone(R)) in a lumbar spinal fusion surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2011;49:267-72. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2011.49.5.267
  13. Park JH, Roh SW. Anterior cervical interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cage filled with autologous and synthetic bone graft substrates for cervical spondylosis: comparative analysis between PolyBone$^{(R)}$ and iliac bone. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2013;53:85-90. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.53.85
  14. Park YH, Kim SG, Lee JW, Yoon YH. Obliteration of temporal dorsal bulla in guinea pigs using different types of calcium phosphate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:1176-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.06.015
  15. Abbah SA, Lam CX, Hutmacher DW, Goh JC, Wong HK. Biological performance of a polycaprolactone-based scaffold used as fusion cage device in a large animal model of spinal reconstructive surgery. Biomaterials 2009;30:5086-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.067
  16. Byun HY, Wang HL. Sandwich bone augmentation using recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor and beta-tricalcium phosphate alloplast: case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:83-7.
  17. Cha JK, Park JC, Jung UW, Kim CS, Cho KS, Choi SH. Case series of maxillary sinus augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate: a clinical and radiographic study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2011;41:98-104. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2011.41.2.98
  18. Elahi MM, Vanduzer S, Spears J, Gibson J, Mitra A. Frontal sinus obliteration with beta-tricalcium phosphate. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:967-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200411000-00015
  19. Kishimoto M, Kanemaru S, Yamashita M, Nakamura T, Tamura Y, Tamaki H, et al. Cranial bone regeneration using a composite scaffold of Beta-tricalcium phosphate, collagen, and autologous bone fragments. Laryngoscope 2006;116:212-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000191468.45536.3f
  20. Suba Z, Takacs D, Matusovits D, Barabas J, Fazekas A, Szabo G. Maxillary sinus floor grafting with beta-tricalcium phosphate in humans: density and microarchitecture of the newly formed bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:102-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01166.x
  21. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x
  22. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:120-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070205.x
  23. Morris HF, Ochi S, Orenstein IH, Petrazzuolo V. AICRG, Part V: Factors influencing implant stability at placement and their influence on survival of Ankylos implants. J Oral Implantol 2004;30: 162-70. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2004)30<162:APVFII>2.0.CO;2
  24. Herr Y. Atlas of periodontology-based implantology I. Seoul: Yenang Inc.; 2012.
  25. Fischer K, Stenberg T, Hedin M, Sennerby L. Five-year results from a randomized, controlled trial on early and delayed loading of implants supporting full-arch prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:433-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01510.x
  26. Valderrama P, Oates TW, Jones AA, Simpson J, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability: a clinical trial. J Periodontol 2007;78:262-72. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060143
  27. Veltri M, Balleri P, Ferrari M. Influence of transducer orientation on Osstell stability measurements of osseointegrated implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9:60-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00035.x

Cited by

  1. Histomorphometric analysis of microcrack healing after the installation of mini-implants vol.45, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.2.62
  2. Primary implant stability in a bone model simulating clinical situations for the posterior maxilla: an in vitro study vol.46, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.4.254
  3. Nanohydroxyapatite Silicate-Based Cement Improves the Primary Stability of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study vol.2017, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2306025
  4. Factores relacionados con el éxito o el fracaso de los implantes dentales colocados en la especialidad de Prostodoncia e Implantología en la Universidad de La Salle Bajío vol.39, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maxilo.2016.02.001
  5. Primary stability of implants with peri-implant bone defects of various widths: an in vitro investigation vol.49, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2019.49.1.39
  6. Bone tissue formation around two titanium implant surfaces placed in bone defects filled with bone substitute material or blood clot: A pilot study vol.21, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12855
  7. The clinical outcome of bone cement in dental implant insertion - A systematic review vol.10, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4103/jdi.jdi_11_20
  8. Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study vol.10, pp.15, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153220