Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction between Organizational Members' Turnover Intention and the Leadership Type of Middle Managers in Agricultural Cooperatives

농협 조직구성원의 이직 의도와 중간관리자의 리더십 유형 관계에서 직무만족도의 매개효과

  • Jeon, Young-Gil (Dept. of Business Administration, Hankyong National University)
  • 전영길 (국립한경대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.13
  • Accepted : 2015.03.20
  • Published : 2015.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There are the leadership is the main factor for managing effective organization as the size of organization becomes large and its functions are a complex and rapidly changing environment. Therefore it needs to suggest the desirable direction for managing organization by the effect of middle manager's leadership on organization's effectiveness. The aim of the present study is to investigate the proper leadership type of middle manager through the mediating effect of job satisfaction between turnover intention and leadership type recognized of organizational members. It suggested the guidelines for the proper leaderships type and the efficient management for employees through the findings. To test hypotheses, the leadership types are classified and the data of this study has collected to evaluate middle managers from the actual employees of agricultural cooperatives in Nonghyup. Through the findings of this study, it is expected the organizational convergence and provides guidelines in managing the agriculture organization to suggest implications and future research directions.

효과적으로 조직을 경영하고자 급변하는 시장 환경에 적응하기 위해 조직개혁을 위한 조직개편 및 서로 다른 조직들 간의 통합관리 등을 지속적으로 추진하고 있다. 특히, 합리적이고 효율적인 방법으로 조직의 목표를 달성하기 위해서는 조직 구성원들의 적극적이며 자발적인 참여를 유발시키는데 영향력을 줄 수 있는 중간관리자의 리더십 역할이 중요하겠다. 본 연구에서는 중간관리자의 리더십이 조직의 효과성에 미치는 연관성을 실제 농협 직원들을 대상으로 실증 분석하였다. 2014년 7월 28일부터 8월 14일까지 실시, 전체 220명을 조사하였으며 이중 192명의 응답을 통하여, 농협 조직구성원들의 이직 의도를 제한하고 직무만족도를 높이기 위한 방안으로 농협 조직의 중간관리자 리더십이 조직의 효과성에 미치는 연관성을 살펴보았다. 즉, 조직구성원들의 직무만족도가 결국은 이직 의도와 조직 중간관리자의 리더십 간에 매개역할을 살펴보는 것은 농협 조직 경영의 효율성 증대 및 목표 달성에 중요한 시사점을 제공할 것이다. 본 연구결과를 통해 조직의 중간관리자들인 과장, 차장이 조직을 관리하는 데 있어 조직구성원들이 고려하는 바람직한 리더십에 대한 가이드라인을 제공하며, 더 나아가 인재육성, 경영효율성, 조직관리 등에 시너지 효과가 나타날 수 있도록, 조직적 융복합 환경 구축에 기여할 수 있으리라 본다.

Keywords

References

  1. B. M. Bass, Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press. 1985.
  2. B. M. Bass.B. J. Avolio. Improving leadership effectiveness through transformational leadership. New York: Sage. 1994.
  3. B. M. Bass.B. J. Avolio, The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 4, pp. 231-272, 1990.
  4. B. M. Bass, B. J. Avolio, D. I. Jung,.Y. Berson, Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 207-218, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
  5. D. N. Den Hartog, J. J. Van Muijen.P. L. Koopman, Transactional versus transformational leadership: an analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 70, pp. 19-34, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00628.x
  6. K. E. Emul.O. J. Umeh, How leadership practices impact job satisfaction of customer relationship officers': an empirical study. Journal of Management Policies and Practices, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 19-56, 2014.
  7. B. M. Bass, B. J. Avolio,.D. I. Jung, MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire (technical report). Redwood City, CA: Center for Leadership Studies, Binghamton University, Distributed by Mind Garden. 1995.
  8. J. L. Price.C. W. Mueller, A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 543-565, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/255574
  9. E. A. Locke, The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette(Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.
  10. B. Schneider.R. A. Snyder, Some relationship between job satisfaction and organizational climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 318-328, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076756
  11. C. M. Hellman, Job satisfaction and intent to leave. Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 137, pp. 677-689, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595491
  12. C. Ostroff, The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: an organizational level analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77, pp. 963-974, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.6.963
  13. M. A. Huselid, The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No.3, pp. 635-872, 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/256741
  14. L. W. Porter.R. M. Steers, Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 80, pp. 151 -176, 1973, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034829
  15. L. W. Porter, R. M. Steers, R. T. Mowday,.P. V. Boulian, Organizational commitment job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 603-609, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037335
  16. M. R. W. Hamstra, N. W. Van Yperen, B. Wisse,. K. Sassenberg, Transformational and transactional leadership styles and followers' regulatory focus fit reduces followers' turnover intentions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 182-186, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000043
  17. R. P. Steel.N. K. Ovalle, A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, pp. 673-686, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.4.673
  18. H. Angle.J. Perry, An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 1-14, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392596
  19. S. J. Jaros, An assessment of Meyer and Allen's(1991) three component model of organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 51, pp. 319-337, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1995.1553
  20. J., R. Hair, R. T. Anderson,.W. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, Inc., 2006.
  21. B. J. Avolio, B. M. Bass,.D. I. Jung, Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 72, pp. 441-462, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789
  22. S. H. Lee.K. H. Song, An analysis on the job attitude of the national agricultural cooperative federation's employees. The Korean Journal of Cooperrative Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 131-150, 2011.
  23. N. Sahaya, A learning organization as a mediator of leadership style and firms' financial performance. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 7, No. 14, pp. 96-113, 2012.
  24. E. Y. Ryu, Moderating effect of collectivism between leadership and innovative behavior using PLS(Partial Least Squares), Korean Public Personnel Administration Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 233-264, 2014.
  25. P. W. Dorfman, International and cross-cultural leadership research. In B. J. Punnett, & O. Shenkar(Eds.), Handbook for international management research (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 2003.
  26. K. M. Park, The impact of organizational culture on organizational effectiveness in agricultural cooperatives: job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job performance. The Korean Journal of Cooperative Studies, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-2, 2012.
  27. P. W. Dorfman, J. P. Howell, S. Hibino, J. K. Lee, U. Tate.A. Bautista, Leadership in western and asian countries: commonalities and difference in effective leadership processes across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 233-274, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90003-5
  28. M. W Dickson, D. N. Den Hartog,.J. K. Mitchelson, Research on leadership in a cross- cultural context: making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 14, pp. 729-768, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.002