Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society (한국안광학회지)

The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society (한국안광학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Dynamic Stereoacuity of Adults in their 20s' with Howard-Dolman Test

하워드-돌먼 입체검사를 이용한 20대 성인의 동적 입체시 평가

  • Shim, Hyun-Suk (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Choi, Sun-Mi (Dept. of Optometry, Jeonbuk Science College) ;
  • Kim, Young-Cheong (Dept. of Medical science, Graduate School Chonnam National University)
  • 심현석 (광주보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 최선미 (전북과학대학 안경광학과) ;
  • 김영청 (전남대학교 일반대학원 의학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.15
  • Accepted : 2015.03.06
  • Published : 2015.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, dynamic stereoacuity of 20s' adults were measured by using the Howard-Dolman test(H-D TEST, Bernell, U.S.A), and compared of male and female. And the correlation between dynamic stereoacuity and PD(pupillary distance), and between dynamic stereoacuity and anisometropia caused by difference in the spherical refractive power of the left and right eyes were analyzed. Methods: The mean age of $22.68{\pm}0.50$(20~29)years old, 20s' 63 adults (30 male, 33 female) were conducted for this experiments. After the full correction of subject's refractive error, dynamic stereoacuity was measured 5 times for 1 subject at 2.5 m distance using the H-D test. at 2.5 distance. Results: The mean of dynamic stereoacuity was $28.44{\pm}25.03$ sec of arc for total subjects, $28.23{\pm}23.34$ sec of arc for male, and $28.63{\pm}26.83$ sec of arc for female. In the dynamic stereoacuity classified by the range of inter-pupil distance (IPD), the dynamic stereoacuity was $33.87{\pm}18.53$ sec for the IPD being under 59.80 mm, $26.24{\pm}25.26$ sec of arc for 59.81~66.15 mm, $34.60{\pm}25.65$ sec of arc for over 66.15 mm. However, there were no significant differences between 3 groups (P=0.73, r=0.03). In dynamic stereoacuity classified by the refractive error difference between two eyes, dynamic stereoacuity was $26.81{\pm}24.86$ sec of arc for the under 1 D, $41.45{\pm}24.18$ sec of arc for over 1 D, and there was no significant difference between two groups (P=0.15, r=0.15). Conclusions: Dynamic stereacuity by the H-D test in 20s adults showed that there was no significant differences between male and female, and PD and anisometropia did not have a significant impact upon the dynamic stereoacuity.

목적: 본 연구에서는 하워드-돌먼 입체검사(Howard-Dolman test, HDTEST, Bernell, U.S.A)를 이용하여 20대 성인의 동적 입체시를 측정하여 남녀 간의 동적 입체시를 비교하고, 동공 간거리(PD; pupillary distance)와 좌우안의 구면굴절력의 차이로 인한 굴절부등과 동적 입체시의 상관관계를 분석해 보고자 하였다. 방법: 평균연령이 $22.68{\pm}0.50$(20~29)세인 20대 성인 63명(남자 30명, 여자 33명)을 대상으로 실험을 실시하였다. 굴절이상자는 완전교정을 한 후에 Howard-Dolman test(H-D Test)를 이용하여 2.5 m 검사거리에서 동적 입체시를 각각 5회 측정하였다. 결과: 전체 대상자의 동적 입체시의 평균은 $28.44{\pm}25.03$초였고, 이들 중 남자는 $28.23{\pm}23.34$초, 여자는 $28.63{\pm}26.83$초였다. PD 범위를 기준으로 한 동적 입체시에 있어서 PD가 59.80 mm이하 범위에서는 $33.87{\pm}18.53$초, 59.81~66.15 mm의 범위에서는 $26.24{\pm}25.26$초, 66.15 mm를 초과하는 범위에서는 $34.60{\pm}25.65$초로 나타났고, 유의한 차이는 보이지 않았다(P=0.73, r=0.03). 굴절부등의 차이를 기준으로 할 때 동적 입체시는 굴절부등이 1 D미만인 경우 $26.81{\pm}24.86$초, 1 D이상인 경우는 $1.45{\pm}24.18$초였고 유의한 차이는 없었다(P=0.15, r=0.15). 결론: H-D test를 이용해 20대 성인의 동적 입체시를 평가해 보았을 때, 남녀 간에 큰 차이가 없고, PD와 굴절부등은 동적 입체시에 큰 영향을 주지 않는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Tychsen L. Binocular vision. In: Moses RA et al. Adler's physiology of the eye, 9th Ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1990;773-810.
  2. Von Noordern GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility, 5th Ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1996;24-28.
  3. Newell FW. Ophthalmology, 6th Ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1986;399-431.
  4. Eggers HM. Strabismus. In: Vaughan D. Asbury ed. General Ophthalmology, 18th Ed., Los Altos; Lange Medical Publications, 1986;205-235.
  5. Romano PE, Romano JA, Puklin JE. Stereoacuity development in children with normal binocular single vision. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79(6):966-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(75)90679-0
  6. Scott WE, Mash J. Stereoacuity in normal indivisuals. Annals of Ophthalmology. 1974;6(2):99-101.
  7. Scott BS, Babara AS, Ralph P. Foundation of binocular vision: A clinical perspective, McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing, 2000;240.
  8. Pettigrew JD. Binocular neurons which signal change of disparity in area 18 of cat visual cortex. Nat New Biol. 1973;241(108):123-124. https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio241123a0
  9. Jin YH. Strabismology, 2nd Ed. Seoul: UUP, 1999;67-75.
  10. Seng FJ. Optometry, 5th Ed. Seoul: Daihakserim, 2007; 232-235.
  11. Borish, Irvin M. Borish's clinical refraction, 2nd Ed. Radarweg, Elsevier, 2006;921-922.
  12. Laby DM, Kirschen DG. Dynamic stereoacuity; Preliminary results and normative data for new test for the quantitative measurement of motion in depth. Optometry & Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72(12):84.
  13. Park SE, Lim KH. Reliability of the dynamic stereoacuity using new personal computer program. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;43(5):149-154.
  14. Lim KH, Hong HJ. Dynamic stereoacuity in normal indivisuals. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;41(11):2408-2414.
  15. Lee MA, Oh JM, Jung JH. Dynamic visual acuity and dynamic stereoacuity of athletes and nonathletes. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2009;14(3):43-49.
  16. Kim SE, Lim KH. The effect of spherical lens-induced anisometropia on dynamic stereoacuity. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1998;39(10):2426-2431.
  17. Campos EC, Enoch JM. Amount of aniseikonia compatible with fine binocular vision: some old and new concepts. J Pediatric Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1980;17(1):44-47.
  18. Lovasik JV, Szymkiw M. Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance, and pupillarysize on stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(5):741-750.
  19. Sung PJ. Optometry, 7th Ed. Seoul: Daihakselim, 2011; 195-232,305-318.
  20. Howard HJ. A test for the judgement of distance. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1919;17:195-235.
  21. Colenbrander MC. The limits of stereoscopis vision. Ophthalmologica. 1948;115(6):363-366.
  22. Larson WL, Lachance A. Stereoscopic acuity with induced refractive errors. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1983;60(6):509-513. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198306000-00011
  23. Park MG, Jin YH. Effect of induced anisometropia on stereoacuity by far and near distance dot stereo test. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;37(5):862-870.
  24. Levy NS, Glick EB. Stereoscopic perception and snellen visual acuity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;78(4):722-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76312-3
  25. Donzis PB, Rappazzo JA, Burde RM, Gordon M. Effect of binocular variations of snellen's visual acuity on titmus stereoacuity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(6):930-932. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010930016
  26. Goodwin RT, Romano PE. Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(7):917-923.
  27. Lee MA, Oh JM, Jeong JH. The effects of sports vision training on baseball player's visual performance and baseball records. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2010;15(1):87-97.

Cited by

  1. The Comparasion of the Dynamic Stereoacuity with Two-Rods Test and Three-Rods Test vol.20, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2015.20.3.377
  2. Comparison and Correlation between Distance Static Stereoacuity and Dynamic Stereoacuity vol.20, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2015.20.3.385
  3. Comparison of Dynamic Stereoacuity According to Dominant Eye and Degree of Dominant Eye vol.21, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2016.21.3.227
  4. The Effects of Uncorrected Astigmatism on Dynamic Stereoacuity vol.22, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.2.143
  5. Distribution of Stereopsis-Perceptible Critical Slope in Verhoeff Stereoptor Test vol.22, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.3.237
  6. Comparison of Dynamic Stereoacuity in Terms of Test Distance vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.4.423
  7. Comparison between Stereopsis Measured in a Natural Space and that Measured Using an Apparatus vol.24, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2019.24.1.71