Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggestions for the Composition of KCR4 Revision

한국목록규칙 4판 개정판의 구성 방안 연구

  • 도태현 (동의대학교 인문대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2015.11.19
  • Accepted : 2015.12.14
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

FRBR and FRAD model, ICP, RDA, NCR Revision are analyzed for the composition of KCR4 Revision. Based on the results, follows are suggested. 1) Entities are divided into work, expression, manifestation, item, person, family, corporate body, concept, object, event, place. 2) Entire cataloging rules are grouped into 'attributes' and 'relationships', and then 'attributes' is divided into attributes describing and access points constructing. 3) Attributes describing is divided into attributes describing of works, expressions, manifestations, items, persons, families, corporate bodies, and arranged as the sequence. 4) Access points constructing is divided into access points constructing of works, expressions, persons, families, corporate bodies, and arranged as the sequence. 5) 'Relationships' is divided into other relationships between group 1 entities, and relationships between persons, families and corporate bodies.

연구는 FRBR과 FRAD 모형, ICP, RDA, NCR 개정안의 분석 결과를 토대로 KCR4 개정판의 구성 방안을 다음과 같이 제시하였다. 1) 개체는 저작, 표현형, 구현형, 개별자료, 개인, 가족, 단체, 개념, 대상, 사건, 장소로 구분한다. 2) 규칙 전체는 '속성'과 '관계'로 대별하며 '속성'은 다시 속성 기술과 접근점 구축으로 구분한다. 3) 속성 기술은 1집단 개체는 저작, 표현형, 구현형, 개별자료의 순으로, 2집단 개체는 개인, 가족, 단체의 순으로 배열한다. 4) 접근점 구축은 저작과 표현형의 접근점 구축, 개인, 가족, 단체의 접근점 구축 순으로 배열한다. 5) '관계'는 저작, 표현형, 구현형, 개별자료 간의 기타 관계와 개인, 가족, 단체 간의 관계에 대한 규칙을 둔다.

Keywords

References

  1. 國立國會圖書館收集書誌部. 2014. 新しい 日本目錄規則全體構成案について. [인용 2015. 11. 5].(National Diet Library, Acquisition Dept. 2014. On the Structure of New NCR. [cited 2015. 11. 5].)
  2. 김정현. 2013. 한국목록규칙의 개정방향에 대한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 44(4): 123-143.(Kim, Jeong-Hyen. 2013. "A Study on the Direction for the Revision of Korean Cataloguing Rules." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(4): 123-143.)
  3. 박진희. 2009. RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 40(2): 111-138.(Park, Jin-Hee. 2009. "Comparative Analysis on Descriptive Rules of RDA and KCR4." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(2): 111-138.)
  4. 이미화. 2012. 국제목록원칙 2009 제정에 따른 한국목록규칙의 방향성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(2): 262-280.(Lee, Mihwa. 2012. "The Study on the Directions of KCR4 under the New ICP 2009." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2): 262-280.)
  5. 이미화. 2011. AACR2에서 RDA로 목록규칙 변화에 따른 KCR4의 고려사항에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(1): 23-42.(Lee, Mihwa. 2011. "A Study on Considerations in KCR4 through Changes of Cataloging Rules from AACR2 to RDA." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1): 23-42.) https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.023
  6. 日本圖書館協會 目錄委員會. 2013. 日本目錄規則 改訂における NDLとの連携について. [인용 2015. 11. 13].(Japan Library Association, Catalogue Committee. 2013. On the Joint with NDL for NCR Revision. [cited 2015. 11. 13].)
  7. 日本圖書館協會 目錄委員會, 國立國會圖書館 收集書誌部. 2013. 日本目錄規則 改訂の基本方針. [인용 2015. 11. 5].(Japan Library Association, Catalogue Committee and National Diet Library, Acquisition Dept. 2013. A Basic Policy for NCR Revision. [cited 2015. 11. 5].)
  8. 韓國圖書館協會 目錄委員會 編. 2003. 韓國目錄規則. 第4版. 서울 : 韓國圖書館協會.(Korean Library Association, Catalogue Committee, ed. 2003. Korean Cataloging Rules. 4th ed. Seoul : Korean Library Association.)
  9. 한국도서관협회 목록위원회 편. 2013. 韓國目錄規則 : 전자책.전자저널 기술규칙. 제4판 보유편. 서울 : 韓國圖書館協會.(Korean Library Association, Catalogue Committee, ed. 2013. Korean Cataloging Rules : For Electronic Books and Electronic Journals. Sup. of 4th ed. Seoul : Korean Library Association.)
  10. 古川 肇. 體現形.個別資料に對する典據形アクセスポイントはなぜ必要か. 2011. [인용 2012. 8. 8].(Furukawa, Hajime. 2011. Access points for manifestation and item are needed?. [cited 2012. 8. 8].)
  11. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 2009. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : Final Report. [cited 2014. 8. 5].
  12. IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRNAR). 2013. Functional Requirements for Authority Data : A Conceptual Model. [cited 2014. 8. 5].
  13. ISBD Review Group. 2011. ISBD. Consolidated ed. [cited 2015. 11. 9].
  14. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA(JSC). 2010. RDA. Chicago: American Library Association.
  15. Statement of International Cataloguing Principles 2009. [cited 2015. 11. 6].
  16. U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. 2011. Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. [cited 2015. 10. 21].