DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimization of coagulant dosage using response surface methodology with central composite design

반응표면분석법-중심합성계획을 이용한 최적 응집제 주입량 산정 연구

  • Kim, Yeseul (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Urban Design and Studies, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Oh, Jeill (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Urban Design and Studies, Chung-Ang University)
  • 김예슬 (중앙대학교 사회기반시스템공학부) ;
  • 오재일 (중앙대학교 사회기반시스템공학부)
  • Received : 2014.12.08
  • Accepted : 2015.04.07
  • Published : 2015.04.15

Abstract

The determining the appropriate dosage of coagulant is very important, because dosage of coagulant in the coagulation process for wastewater affects removing the amount of pollutants, cost, and producing sludge amount. Accordingly, in this study, in order to determine the optimal PAC dosage in the coagulation process, CCD (Central composite design) was used to proceed experimental design, and the quadratic regression models were constructed between independent variables (pH, influent turbidity, PAC dosage) and each response variable (Total coliform, E.coli, PSD (Particle size distribution) (< $10{\mu}m$), TP, $PO_4$-P, and $COD_{cr}$) by the RSM (Response surface methodology). Also, Considering the various response variables, the optimum PAC dosage and range were derived. As a result, in order to maximize the removal rate of total coliform and E.coli, the values of independent variables are the pH 6-7, the influent turbidity 100-200 NTU, and the PAC dosage 0.07-0.09 ml/L. For maximizing the removal rate of TP, $PO_4$-P, $COD_{cr}$, and PSD(< $10{\mu}m$), it is required for the pH 9, the influent turbidity 200-250 NTU, and the PAC dosage 0.05-0.065 ml/L. In the case of multiple independent variables, when the desirable removal rate for total coliform, E.coli, TP, and $PO_4$-P is 90-100 % and that for $COD_{cr}$ and PSD(< $10{\mu}m$) is 50-100 %, the required PAC dosage is 0.05-0.07 ml/L in the pH 9 and influent turbidity 200-250 NTU. Thus, if the influent turbidity is high, adjusting pH is more effective way in terms of cost since a small amount of PAC dosage is required.

Keywords

References

  1. A.G. El Samrani, B.S. Lartiges, and F. Villieras (2008) Chemical coagulation of combined sewer overflow: Heavy metal removal and treatment optimization, Water Research, 42(4-5), 951-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.09.009
  2. American Water Works Association (AWWA) (1969) Water Treatment Plant Design (adopted from Unit Operations and Processes in Environmental Engineering, 1996).
  3. Clair N. Sawyer, Perry L. Mccarty, and Gene F. Parkin (1994) Chemistry for Environmental Engineering, McGraw-Hill Book co.
  4. David H Bache and Ross Gregory (2007) Flocs in Water Treatment, IWA Publishing.
  5. Deniz Bas and Ismail H. Boyaci (2007) Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology, Journal of Food Engineering, 78(3), 836-845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024
  6. Douglas C. Montgomery (2013) Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley.
  7. Gilbert M. Masters and Wendell P. Ela (2008) Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science, Pearson Education, Inc.
  8. Gil-Seong Lee (2012) Effect of CO2 injection on pH control and Coagulation in Water Treatment Plant, Changwon National University.
  9. Gregory S. Patience (2013) Experimental Methods and Instrumentation for Chemical Engineers, Elsevier.
  10. Howard S. Peavy, Donald R. Rowe, and George Tchobanoglous (1998) Environmental Engineering, McGraw-Hill.
  11. Jian-Ping Wang, Yong-Zhen Chen, Xue-Wu Ge, and Han-Qing Yu (2007) Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process for a paper-recycling wastewater treatment using response surface methodology, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 302(1-3), 204-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.02.023
  12. John Bratby (2006) Coagulation and Flocculation in Water and Wastewater Treatment, IWA Publishing.
  13. Marcos Almeida Bezerra, Ricardo Erthal Santelli, Eliane Padua Oliveira, Leonardo Silveira Villar, and Luciane Amelia Escaleira (2008) Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry, Talanta, 76(5), 965-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019
  14. Metcalf and Eddy (2004) Wastewater engineering treatmentand reuse, Mc graw hill.
  15. Michael L. Shuler and Fikret Kargi (2002) BioprocessEngineering Basic Concepts, Pearson Education International.
  16. Raymond H. Myers, Douglas C. Montgomery, and Christine M. Anderson-cook (2009) Response Surface Methodology, Wiley.
  17. Shahin Ghafari, Hamidi Abdul Azizb, Mohamed Hasnain Isa, and Ali Akbar Zinatizadehd (2009) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation- flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(2-3), 650-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.090
  18. U. S. Environmental Protction Agency (2001) The Incorporation of Water Treatment Effects on Pesticide Removal and Transformations in Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) Drinking Water Assessments, Office of Pesticide Programs United States Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460.
  19. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Conventional Treatment, Drinking Water Treatability Database, Available at: http://iaspub.epa.gov/tdb/pages/treatment/treatmentOverview.do

Cited by

  1. Optimization of distribution basin and ratio at valve opening in the water treatment process vol.29, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2015.29.5.559
  2. Optimizing Coagulation Conditions of Magnetic based Ballast Using Response Surface Methodology vol.39, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2017.39.12.689