Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A case report about the reconstruction procedures of the previously failed cylinderical implants site using distraction osteogenesis

  • Lee, Jung-Tae (Department of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Park, Shin-Young (Department of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Yi, Yang-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-Jung (Department of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2014.10.06
  • Accepted : 2014.12.09
  • Published : 2015.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We report the eventually successful treatment of a huge bone defect and peri-implantitis following reconstruction of a previously failed intra-mobile cylinder implant system (IMZ) implant site using distraction osteogenesis (DO). In the anterior mandible, two IMZ implants failed and surgical debridement was performed in accordance to the patient's needs. Thereafter, mobility and suppuration were decreased and the patient visited the dental clinic on a regular basis for oral health maintenance. However, the inflammation did not resolve, and the bone destruction around the implants progressed for 4 years. Finally, the implants failed and a severe bone defect remained after implant removal. To reconstruct the bone defects, we attempted bone graft procedures. Titanium mesh was unsuccessfully used to obtain bone volume regeneration. However, DO subsequently was used to obtain sufficient bone volume for implant placement. The new implants were then installed, followed by prosthetic procedures. In conclusion, progression of peri-implantitis could not be arrested despite surgical intervention and repeated maintenance care for 3 years. Reconstruction of the peri-implantitis site was complicated due to its horizontal and vertical bone defects. Lesions caused by implant failure require an aggressive regenerative strategy, such as DO. DO was successful in reconstruction of a peri-implantitis site that was complicated due to horizontal and vertical bone defects.

Keywords

References

  1. Mombelli A, Muller N, Cionca N. The epidemiology of periimplantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(Suppl 6):67-76.
  2. Willer J, Noack N, Hoffmann J. Survival rate of IMZ implants: a prospective 10-year analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:691-5. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50115
  3. Rinke S, Ohl S, Ziebolz D, Lange K, Eickholz P. Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:826-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02061.x
  4. Leonhardt A, Renvert S, Dahlen G. Microbial findings at failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:339-45. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100501.x
  5. Renvert S, Roos-Jansaker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Rutger Persson G. Infection at titanium implants with or without a clinical diagnosis of inflammation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:509-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01378.x
  6. Roccuzzo M, Bonino F, Aglietta M, Dalmasso P. Ten-year results of a three arms prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients. Part 2: clinical results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:389-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02309.x
  7. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Reasons for failures of oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:443-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12157
  8. Machtei EE, Frankenthal S, Blumenfeld I, Gutmacher Z, Horwitz J. Dental implants for immediate fixed restoration of partially edentulous patients: a 1-year prospective pilot clinical trial in periodontally susceptible patients. J Periodontol 2007;78:1188-94. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060418
  9. Levine RA, Clem D, Beagle J, Ganeles J, Johnson P, Solnit G, et al. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the solid-screw ITI implant for posterior single-tooth replacements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:550-6.
  10. Spiekermann H, Jansen VK, Richter EJ. A 10-year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using barretained overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:231-43.
  11. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Failure patterns of four osseointegrated oral implant systems. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997;8:843-7. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018593403126
  12. Wolvius EB, Scholtemeijer M, Weijland M, Hop WC, van der Wal KG. Complications and relapse in alveolar distraction osteogenesis in partially dentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:700-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.05.002
  13. Iizuka T, Hallermann W, Seto I, Smolka W, Smolka K, Bosshardt DD. Bi-directional distraction osteogenesis of the alveolar bone using an extraosseous device. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:700-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01185.x
  14. Polo WC, Cury PR, Sendyk WR, Gromatzky A. Posterior mandibular alveolar distraction osteogenesis utilizing an extraosseous distractor: a prospective study. J Periodontol 2005;76:1463-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.9.1463
  15. Cordaro L, Amade DS, Cordaro M. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:103-11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130113.x
  16. Kourtis SG, Sotiriadou S, Voliotis S, Challas A. Private practice results of dental implants. Part I: survival and evaluation of risk factors--Part II: surgical and prosthetic complications. Implant Dent 2004;13:373-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000148564.88384.de