Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Critical Success Factors and Policy Direction of ICT-based Convergency Company

ICT기반 융합기업의 성공 요인 및 정책방향에 대한 연구

  • Weon, Sang-Ho (Dept. of Information Management, Graduate School of Venture, Hoseo University) ;
  • Yang, Hae-Sool (Dept. of Information Management, Graduate School of Venture, Hoseo University)
  • 원상호 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 정보경영학과) ;
  • 양해술 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 정보경영학과)
  • Received : 2015.01.02
  • Accepted : 2015.04.20
  • Published : 2015.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

ICT convergence has attracted attention as a major means of corporate innovation. In this study in-depth interviews was had to analyze the success factors of ICT-based companies that created a performance through the convergence. The success factors of ICT convergence were analyzed by differentiating your company's products and services through the integration of ICT skills, securing convergence technologies with enhanced R&D investment, and the strong leadership of CEO and collaborative relationships at home and abroad for convergence. It is a positive impact on success of ICT convergence to try the innovations in products, to invest R&D aggressively and to construct a global partnership network. As these results, they was proposed as a policy direction for the diffusion of ICT convergence.

ICT융합은 기업의 대표적인 혁신 수단으로 주목받고 있다. 성과를 창출하고 있는 ICT기반의 융합기업을 대상으로 성공요인을 도출하기 위해 심층인터뷰를 했다. ICT융합 기업의 성공요인은 ICT기술의 융합을 통한 제품과 서비스의 차별화, R&D투자 강화를 통한 융합형 기술력 확보, 융합에 대한 CEO 강력한 리더십 및 국내외 협업관계의 강화 등으로 분석되었다. ICT융합에서 제품 및 서비스의 혁신을 위한 노력, 적극적인 R&D투자, 글로벌 협력 네트워크 구축 등은 성공에서 긍정적인 영향을 준다. 또한 복잡한 인허가 절차, 국산 제품 및 서비스의 나쁜 선입견, 해외진출 부담 등은 부정적인 효과를 준다. 이런 결과를 ICT융합 확산을 위한 정책적 방향으로 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. J. Kim, A analysis and implications for productivity research of six promising technology, p6, Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, 2008.
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Special Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Technology, activation of Convergence Thereof, etc, Article 2 (Definitions), Act No. 12032, 2013.
  3. OECD, INFORMATION ECONOMY. SECTOR DEFINITIONS BASED ON THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION (ISIC 4), p8, WPIIS DSTI/ICCP/IIS(2006)2/FINAL, 2007.
  4. Gartner, IT Glossary, definition, 2014, http://blogs.gartner.com/it-glossary/it-information-technology/
  5. EITO, ICT Market Report 2014/15 Definitions & Methodology, p5, EITO in collaboration with IDC, 2014.
  6. N. Rosenberg, Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840-1910, The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp.414-443, 1963. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700109155
  7. A. Gambardella; S. Torrisi, Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry, Research Policy, No. 27, pp.445-463, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00062-6
  8. B. Weaver, Industry Convergence: Driving forces, factors and consequences, p12, The Institute of Economic Research, 2007.
  9. U. H. Ji, A research for Software industry development plan in accordance with the software convergence trends, Korea IT Promotion Agency, No 16, pp. 17-18. 2008.
  10. D. Yoffie, Introduction: Chess and competing in the age of digital convergence, Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence. p.4, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
  11. European Commission, Green paper on the convergence of the telecommunications, media and information technology sectors, and the implications for regulation, Brussels, 3 December 1997.
  12. OECD, THE IMPLICATIONS OF CONVERGENCE FOR REGULATION OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2003)5/FINAL, July 12, 2004.
  13. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, The Diffusion Strategy of IT Convergence, p3, 2010.
  14. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Special Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Technology, activation of Convergence Thereof, etc, Article 2 (Definitions), Act No. 12032, 2013
  15. J. Ha.S. B. Lee, Development and Policy Implications of IT convergence industry, pp. 36-37, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics&Trade, 2012.
  16. J. S. Hwang, Philosophy and vision of the broadcast communication convergence, No.2, pp. 41-42, KISDI, 2008.
  17. KOTRA, Information & Communications Technology Commission, p.5, KOTRA, 2014.
  18. H. S. Yang, An Empirical Study on the Success Factors of Korea Venture Business, Incheon Univ. Ph.D Thesis, 2002.
  19. N. Venkatraman . V. Ramanujam, Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research : A Comparison of Approaches, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp.801-814, 1986. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1986.4283976
  20. A. C. Cooper. W. C. Dunkelberg, Entrepreneurial Research: Old Question, New Answers, and Methodological Issues, American Journal of Small Business, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.11-23, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878701100301
  21. D. Dvir. A. Shenhar, Measuring the Success of Technology Based Strategic Business Unit, Engineering Management Journal, vol. 4, No. 4, pp.33-38, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.1992.11414701
  22. R. N. Lussier, Non-financial Business Success versus Failure Prediction Model. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 33, pp8-20, 1995.
  23. K. H. Kim. J. Y. Jung, A Typology of Industry Convergences Based on Sources for Convergence Industries and Analysis of Critical Success Factors, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp.204-211, 2013. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2013.39.3.204
  24. J. Y. Shin. J. Y. Lim, IT small venture companies in research and development, market orientation, innovation and performance, Venture Business Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.25-39, 2008.
  25. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, Survey of Research and Development in Korea 2013, p35, Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, 2014.