The Journal of the Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지)

The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (한국인터넷방송통신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Start-up Circulation Structure Design based on Corporate Ecosystem and Its Case Studies

기업생태계에 기초한 창업순환 구조설계 및 사례 연구

  • 유순덕 (한세대학교 경영학부 e 비즈니스)
  • Received : 2015.03.07
  • Accepted : 2015.04.10
  • Published : 2015.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study the cyclic structure of startup ecosystem and draw the necessary conditions for maintaining it to successfully induce the activation entrepreneurship. Therefore, we design start-up cycle structure based on the enterprise ecosystem to verify this, we discussed the Tech City in the United Kingdom and Silicon Valley in USA. Required factors for running the start-up cycle structure is summarized as follows. First, the shared platform is provided to form between components in accordance with the object, second, this can be made based on the excellent human resources, third, a number of consumer groups such as venture capitals and angels that revenue from the virtuous circle should be formed, fourth, get the other regional networks and associated, fifth to make it easy to start-ups through government and institutional support and finally, a stand-alone producers(startups) should be fostering entrepreneurship.

본 연구의 목적은 창업활성화를 성공적으로 유도하기 위해 필요한 요소로서 창업순환 구조를 연구하고 이를 유지하기 위한 필수조건을 도출하는 데에 있다. 따라서 기업생태계를 기반으로 창업순환구조를 설계한 후 이를 검증하기 위해 미국의 실리콘밸리와 영국의 테크시티(Tech city)에 대하여 논의하였다. 창업순환구조를 유지하기 위한 필수요소는 다음과 같이 정리하였다. 첫째, 목적에 따라 구성요소 간의 공유의 장이 형성되어야 한다. 둘째, 우수한 인력이 기반 되어야 한다, 셋째, 선순환구조에서 수익을 창출하는 소비자 집단이 많이 형성되어야 한다. 넷째, 타 지역간 연계 네트워크를 확보해야한다. 다섯째, 정부 및 제도적 지원을 통해 쉽게 창업할 수 있는 환경을 만들어 생산자의 진입이 용이해야 한다. 마지막으로 자립형 생산자들의 기업가정신이 함양되어야 한다. 향후 연구는 기업 생태계를 기반으로 한 여러 국가의 사례를 바탕으로 각 사례의 공통점과 차이점에 대해 비교 분석하는 방향으로 나아갈 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. OECD, Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2012.
  2. GEM, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011 Global Report, 2011.
  3. GEM, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2012 Global Report, 2012.
  4. D. D. Gregorio . S Shane, Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?, Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 209-227. 2013.
  5. D. Y Jung . Y. S Kim, A Study on the Evaluation of the Korean Governmental Supporting Stages and the Ecosystem Model for Venture Companies. 2013
  6. D. G Fridman, Where Science means Business, 2013.
  7. S. D Yoo . K. D. Choi, Business Ecosystem and Ecosystem of Big Data, LNCS 8597, pp.1-12, 2014.
  8. S. D Yoo . J. I Kim . K. S Ryu, Using Big Data Strategy for the Development of the Communication Industry, LNCS 8597, pp.349-359, 2014.
  9. J. F Moore, Predators and prey: the new ecology of competition. Harv. Bus. Rev. Vol, 71, No. 3, pp.75-83 1993.
  10. J. F Moore, The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems, Harvard Business, New York, pp. 297, 1996.
  11. F. T. Rathaermel, University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp.781-791. 2007.
  12. S Shane . R Khurana, Career Experiences and Firm Foundings. 2007.
  13. S Shane, Technology opportunity and firm formation Management Science Vol. 2, No. 47, pp.205-220. 2012.
  14. S Shane, Technology regimes and new firm formation, Management Science Vol. 47 No. 9, pp.173-190. 2011.
  15. O Sorenson . T. Stuart, Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 6, No. 106, pp.1546-1590. 2001.
  16. L. Zucker,. et al., Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises, 1988.
  17. Y. S Meong, Support Israel, 2014.
  18. J. S Kim, Enterprise-led venture capital 2014.
  19. C. Y Im, Factors Influencing Survival ventures, 2006.
  20. H. B Yang . J. B Park, Youth entrepreneurship Revitalization, 2011.
  21. S. W Yoo, Venture fever and changes in the economic structure of South Korea, 2000.
  22. S. K Lee, Leverage and expected effects of tax incentives for venture ecosystem activation step, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, 2011.
  23. Y. J Kim, Technology-based start-ups influence factor analysis and Revitalization of the University, Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, 2014.
  24. D. K Lee, Activation and role of youth entrepreneurship finance, 2014
  25. S. K Lee, Leverage and expected effects of tax incentives for venture ecosystem activation step, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, 2014.
  26. D. H Ha, Using the data business strategy, SKT, 2014.
  27. J. S Lee, Start-up through Big Data Analysis, 2014.
  28. H. S Jin, Challenge for the excavation of the new mobile business revenue model, 2014.
  29. J. S Han, Big data startup, KAIST, 2014.
  30. Y. S Hwang . S.T Khun . S.G Yeon, S. W Kim, Lattice design strategies for building an effective cluster model and case study - focused on the Chungbuk SW industry, 2007.
  31. J. B Im . H. G Cho . S. Y Chung The study on the policy for the formation of the innovation cluster-Focus on Pangyo technovalley in Gyeonggi Province, 2010.
  32. D. K Bok, Network structure of successful industrial cluster-Cases of Silicon Valley and Toyota city, 2011.
  33. J Podolny . T.Stuart,, A role-based ecology of technical change, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 5, No. 100, 2007.
  34. H. J Im, Example of business incubation in Silicon valley, USA, 2012.
  35. Babson College . Baruch College, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2012 United States Report, 2012.
  36. T. Bailetti, Technology Entrepreneurship: Overview, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects, Technology Innovation Management Review, 2007.
  37. H Bathelt, A Knowledge based typology of University spin-offs in the context of regional economic development, Technovation, No 30, pp.519-532, 2012.
  38. D. Hsu . T Bernstein, Managing the university technology licensing process: findings from case studies, Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, No 9, pp.1-33. 1997.
  39. Kauffman, Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT, 1998.
  40. J. Lerner, Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms, Journal of Finance, Vol. 1, No. 50, pp.301-318. 1995.
  41. J. Levie . M. Hart, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor United Kingdom 2011 Monitoring Report, University of Strathclyde, 1992.