Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Site Selection of Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis) Habitat Restoration Using Habitat Suitability Index

서식처 적합성 지수(HSI)를 활용한 맹꽁이 서식처 복원 위치 선정

  • 심윤진 (넥서스환경디자인연구원(주)) ;
  • 조동길 (넥서스환경디자인연구원(주)) ;
  • 홍진표 (넥서스환경디자인연구원(주)) ;
  • 김덕호 (넥서스환경디자인연구원(주)) ;
  • 박용수 (국립생태원) ;
  • 성현찬 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과)
  • Received : 2015.02.24
  • Accepted : 2015.04.27
  • Published : 2015.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was performed to propose the site selection plan for the restoration of the target Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis) habitat, and has developed the AHP model to select the optimal site for narrow-mouth frog habitat restoration on the basis of the narrow-mouth frog Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) items (factors and variables). The assessment areas were established by the narrow-mouth frog HSI factors such as space, feed, cover, water(breeding), threatening factors and others, and the sub-assessment items by each assessment area were established based on the narrow-mouth frog HSI variables. The weighting values of the assessment areas and items were calculated by the developed AHP method. The weighting values of the 5 assessment areas were arranged in order as cover(0.283), water(breeding)(0.276), feed(0.230), space(0.147), and threatening factor(0.064). The final weighting values of the 14 assessment items were arranged in order of height as low-rise grassland(0.190), soil quality(0.178), and stones and between the stones(0.105). The scoring criteria according to the assessment items and factors were marked and applied by equal intervals considering the criteria by HSI items of the narrow-mouth frog and finally the scoring criteria diagram has been proposed for the optimal site selection of the narrow-mouth frog habitat restoration.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, L. W. 1994. Urban wildlife habitats: a landscape perspective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  2. Bae SW. 2013. A Study of Planning Indicators for the Creation of Environment-friendly External Space in Apartment House Regeneration Projects. Ph.D dissertation, Graduate School of Dankook University. (in Korean with English summary)
  3. Cho DG. 2011. Ecological restoration planning and designing. Seoul: NEXUS Environmental design centre. (in Korean)
  4. Davidson, C..H. B. Shafer and M. R. Jennings. 2002. Spatial tests of the pesticide drift, habitat destruction, UV-B, and climate-change hypotheses for California amphibian declines. Conservation Biology 16: 1588-1601. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01030.x
  5. Denbow, T. J..D. Klements and D. W. Rothman. 1996. Report 379: Guidelines for the Development of Wetland Replacement Areas. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
  6. Gardner, T. 2001. Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon in conservation biology. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 24.2: 25-44.
  7. Heyer, W. R..M. A. Donnelly.R. W. McDiarmid. L. A. C. Hayek and M. S. Foster. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: Standard methods for amphibians. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 1-15.
  8. Hong JP.Lee JW.Choi OH.Son JD.Cho DG and Ahn TM. 2014. A Study on Land Acquisiton Priority for Establishing Riparian Buffer Zones in Korea. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 17(4): 29-41. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2014.17.4.29
  9. Hwang YS. 2000. Study in the ecology of the Korean narrow-mouthed frog(Kaloula borealis). MA dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education. (in Korean with English summary)
  10. Kim DK.Park YW and Lee SM. 2007. Assessment of tourism resource development by the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Focusing on the Planning Process. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 21(4): 5-18. (in Korean with English summary)
  11. Kim BC. 2006. A Priority Analysis on Corporate Social Contribution Programs Through Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP), ADVERTISING RESEARCH 71: 131-151. (in Korean)
  12. Kim SK. 2009. Habitat Suitability Assessment for the Reintroduction of Oriental White Stork (Ciconia boyciana): A GIS-based Multi-Criteria Evaluation Approach. Ph.D dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education. (in Korean with English summary)
  13. Korea Development Institute(KDI). 2000. A Study on Multi-Criteria Analysis for Pre-feasibility Study. (in Korean)
  14. Korea Development Institute(KDI). 2008. A Study on General Guidelines for Pre-feasibility Study (5th Edition). (in Korean)
  15. Korea Research Foundation(KRF). 2007. A Study on the Development Direction of Academic Research Support Programs using AHP: Centered on the Basic Research Support of Science and Engineering. Korea Research Foundation Report (Policy Research-2007-005-Academic Policy). (in Korean)
  16. Ko SB. 2012. Ecological Study of Kaloula borealis on Jeju Island. Ph.D dissertation, Graduate School of Jeju National University. (in Korean with English summary)
  17. Ko SB.Ko YM and Oh HS. 2011a. Distribution of Spawning Site of Kaolula borealis in Jeju Island. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 25(6): 846-852. (in Korean with English summary)
  18. Ko SB.Lee JH and Oh HS. 2011b. Age Structure Analysis of Kaolula borealis. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 25(6): 861-866. (in Korean with English summary)
  19. Ko SB.Chang MH.Yang KS and Oh HS. 2012a. Feeding Habitats of the Kaloula borealis during the Breeding Season. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 26(3): 333-341. (in Korean with English summary)
  20. Ko SB.Chang MH.Song JY and Oh HS. 2012b. Meteorological Factors Influencing Breeding Biology of Kaloula borealis. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 26(6): 876-883. (in Korean with English summary)
  21. Koo BH.Jung JY and Park MO. 2011. Developing the Ecological Performance Standard for Replaced Wetlands by Analyzing Reference Wetlands. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 14(1): 11-22. (in Korean with English summary)
  22. Lee CH. 2000. Group Decision Theory. Seoul: Sejong publishers. (in Korean)
  23. Lee EJ. 2003. A Program Evaluation of the Environment Education in Practical Experience using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). MA dissertation, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary)
  24. Lee KH. 2011. Study on the selection of reuse options for decommissioned NPP site using AHP. MA dissertation, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary)
  25. National Institute of Biological Resources(NIBR). 2011. Red Data Book of Endangered Amphibians and Reptiles in Korea. pp. 22-27. (in Korean)
  26. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw. pp. 3-35.
  27. Saaty, T. L. 2001. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process(2nd ed.). Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. p. 84.
  28. SER(Society for Ecological Restoration, Science and Policy Working Group). 2004. The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration.
  29. Shim YJ. 2004. A study on the site selection of wetland replacement using Korean redfrog (Runa amurensis coreana Okada) habitat suitability index: focusing on Pangyo residential development site. MA dissertation, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary)
  30. Shim YJ.Cho DG.Park S.Lee DJ.Seo YH. Kim SH.Kim DH.Ko SB.Cha JY and Sung HC. 2014. Development of Habitat Suitability Index for Habitat Restoration of Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis). Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 17(2): 109-123. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.2.109
  31. Song JY.Chung KH.M. Matsui.Oh HS and W. Zhao. 2006. Distinct specific status of the Korean brown frog, Rana amurensis coreana (Amphibia: Ranidae). Zoological science 23(2): 219-224. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.23.219
  32. Suh JH and Yang HS. 2004. A Study on Framing Techniques of Landscape Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process: The Assessment on the Landscape Control Points. Journal of Korean institute of landscape architecture 32(4): 94-104. (in Korean with English summary)
  33. Urbanska, K. M..N. R. Webb and P. J. Edwards. 1997. Restoration ecology and sustainable development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Vitt, L. J..J. P. Caldwell.H. M. Wilbur and D. C. Smith. 1990. Amphibians as harbingers of decay. BioScience 40: 418. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioscience/40.6.418
  35. Wake, D. B. and V. T. Vredenburg. 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences of United States America 105: 11466-11473. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801921105
  36. While, M. R..K. R. Lips.C. M. Pringle.S. S. Kilhara.R. J. Bixby.R. Brenes, S. Connelly. J. C. Colon-Gaud.M. Hunter-Brown.A. D. Huryn.C. Montgomery and S. Peterson. 2006. The effects of amphibian population declines on the structure and function of Neotropical stream ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0027:TEOAPD]2.0.CO;2
  37. Wyman R. L. 1990. What's happening to the amphibians? Conservation Biology. 4: 350-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00307.x
  38. Yang SY.Kim JB.Min MS.Suh JH and Kang YJ. 2001. Monograph of Korean Amphibia. Seoul: Academy press. (in Korean)

Cited by

  1. Relationship between Abundances of Kaloula borealis and Meteorological Factors based on Habitat Features vol.19, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.3.103
  2. A Study on the Improvement Plan for a Habitat of 'Gold-spotted Pond Frog (Pelophylax chosenicus)' in Danger of Regional Extinction in the Urban Area - Case on the Abandoned Railroad Site on Su-in Line - vol.19, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.2.95
  3. Planning of Narrow-mouth Frog (Kaloula borealis) Habitat Restoration Using Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) vol.3, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2016.3.1.062
  4. A Study on Site Selection for Reeve's turtle(Maunemys reevesii) Habitats Using Habitat Suitability Index vol.18, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2015.18.3.109