DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Chemical Amendments on Soil Biological Quality in Heavy Metal Contaminated Agricultural Field

  • Kim, Yoo Chul (Department of Bio-environmental Chemistry, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Hong, Young Kyu (Department of Bio-environmental Chemistry, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Se Jin (Department of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Oh, Seung Min (Department of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ji, Won Hyun (Technology Research Center, Korea Mine Reclamation Corporation) ;
  • Yang, Jae E. (Department of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung Chul (Department of Bio-environmental Chemistry, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2015.03.05
  • Accepted : 2015.04.18
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

Heavy metal pollution has been a critical problem in agricultural field near at the abandoned metal mines and chemical amendments are applied for remediation purpose. However, biological activity can be changed depending on chemical amendments affecting crop productivity. Main purpose of this research was to evaluate biological parameters after applying chemical amendments in heavy metal polluted agricultural field. Result showed that soil respiration (SR) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) were changed after chemical amendments were applied. Among three different amendments, lime stone (LS), steel slag (SS), and acid mine drainage sludge(AMDS), AMDS had an effect to increase SR in paddy soil. Comparing to control ($93.98-170.33mg\;kg^{-1}day^{-1}$), average of 30% increased SR was observed. In terms of MBC, SS had an increased effect in paddy soil. However, no significant difference of SR and MBC was observed in upland soil after chemical amendment application. Overall, SR can be used as an indicator of heavy metal remediation in paddy soil.

Keywords

References

  1. Banerjee, K., G.L. Amy, M. Prevost, S. Nour, M. Jekel, P.M. Gallagher, and C.D. Blumenschein. 2008. Kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of adsorption of arsenic onto granular ferric hydroxide (GFH). Water Res. 42:3371-3378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.019
  2. Castaldi, P., L. Santona, P. Melis. 2005. Heavy metals immobilization by chemical amendments in a polluted soil and influence on white lupin growth. Chemosphere. 60:365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.098
  3. Friesl, W., E. Lombi, O. Horak, and W.W. Wenzel. 2003. Immobilization of heavy metals in soils using inorganic amendments in greenhouse study. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 166:191-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200390028
  4. Gray, C.W., S.J. Dunham, P.G. Dennis, F.J. Zhao, S.P. McGrath. 2006. Fields evaluation of in-situ remediation of a heavy metal contaminated soil using lime and red-mud. Environ. Pollut. 142:530-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.10.017
  5. Jiang, J., L. Wu, N. Ni, Y. Luo, L. Liu, Q. Zhao. 2010. Effects of multiple heavy metal contamination and repeated phytoextraction by sedum plumbizincicola on soil microbial properties. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 46:18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.10.001
  6. Johnson, D.B., K.B. Hallberg. 2005. Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 338:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002
  7. Kizikaya, R., T. Askin, B. Bayrakli, and M. Saglam. 2004. Microbiological characteristics of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 40:95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2004.10.002
  8. Ko, M.S., J.Y. Kim, J.S. Lee, J.I. Ko, and K.W. Kim. 2013. Arsenic immobilization in water and soil using acid mine drainage sludge. Appl. Geochem. 35:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.05.008
  9. Leita, L., M. de Nobili, G. Mublbachova, C. Mondini, L. Marchiol, and G. Zerbi. Bioavailability and effects of heavy metals on soil microbial biomass survival during laboratory incubation
  10. Mench, M., G. Renella, A. Gelsomino, L. Landi, and P. Nannipieri. 2006. Biochemical parameters and bacterial species richness in soils contaminated by sludge-borne metals and remediated with inorganic soil amendments. Environ. Pollut. 144:24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.01.014
  11. Muhlbachova, G., M. Sagova-Mareckova, M. Omelka, J. Szakova, and P. Tlustos. 2015. The influence of soil organic carbon on interactions between microbial parameters and metal concentrations at a long term contaminated site. Sci. Total Environ. 502:218-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.079
  12. Naseri, M., A. Vazirzadeh, R. Kazemi, and F. Zaheri. 2015. Concentration of some heavy metals in rice types available in Shiraz market and humn risk assessment. Food Chem. 175: 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.109
  13. Nwachukwu, O.I. and I.D. Pulford. 2011. Microbial respiration as an indicator of metal toxicity in contaminated organic materials and soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 185:1140-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.024
  14. Oh, S. J., S.C. Kim, H.S. Yoon, H.N. Kim, T.H. Kim, K.H. Yeon, J.S. Lee, S.J. Hong, and J. E. Yang,. 2011. Evaluating heavy metal stabilization efficiency of chemical amendment in agricultural field: Field experiment, Korean J. Soil. Sci. Fert. 44:1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.6.1052
  15. Renella, G., A.M. Chaudri, C.M. Falloon, L. Landi, P. Nannipieri, P.C. Brooks. 2007. Effects of Cd, Zn or both on soil microbial biomass and activity in a clay loam soil. Biol Fertil. Soils. 43:751-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-006-0159-5
  16. Ye, X., S. Kang, H. Wang, H. Li, Y. Zhang, G. Wang, and H. Zhao. 2015. Modified natural diatomite and its enhanced immobilization of lead, copper, and cadmium in simulated contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Materi. 289:210-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.052