DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Promoting Resources Efficiency in the Life-cycle of Resource for Sustainable Resource Management

지속 가능한 자원관리를 위한 자원 전과정에서의 효율적 자원이용 촉진

  • Lee, Il-Seuk (Center for Resources Information and Management, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Kang, Hong-Yoon (Center for Resources Information and Management, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology)
  • 이일석 (한국생산기술연구원 자원순환기술지원센터) ;
  • 강홍윤 (한국생산기술연구원 자원순환기술지원센터)
  • Received : 2015.02.11
  • Accepted : 2015.03.30
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

Recently, the importance of efficient resource management has been highlighted due to the uncertainty of its security. Developed countries promote the legislative provision and transition of industrial structure to maximize the efficiency of resource use through supporting the sustainable resource management at national level. Meanwhile Korea has very sensitive industrial structure along with the international resource supply and demand conditions. It is acutely necessary to improve the resource productivity with the various action plans such as the increase of recycling rate and the establishment of methodical resource management system. Especially, the study on the direction of each flow stage and the concrete action plans for using resource efficiently in the life-cycle of resource will be required. Therefore, this study suggests the future direction of each flow stage(production stage and circulatory stage), and the concrete action plans to improve the present problems of resource management in Korea.

자원수급의 불확실성이 점차 고조되고 있는 글로벌 상황에 능동적으로 대처하기 위해 전 세계적으로 효율적인 자원관리의 필요성이 증대되고 있다. 자원관리 선진국들은 국가차원에서의 지속가능한 자원관리를 유도 및 지원하기 위해 자원이용의 효율성을 극대화하기 위한 법제도 마련 및 산업구조로의 전환을 촉진하고 있다. 한편, 국내의 경우 자원수급과 관련하여 국제환경에 매우 민감한 산업구조를 나타냄에 따라 국가 주도의 자원효율성의 획기적인 제고 방안 마련이 절실히 요구된다. 특히 자원 전과정에서의 자원의 효율적 이용을 위한 단계별 추구해야 할 방향과 구체적 실천방안에 대해 검토가 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 자원 전과정을 크게 생산계와 순환계로 구분하고 이에 따른 단계별 국내 자원관리의 현황 및 문제점, 이를 개선하기 위한 방향성 및 구체적 실천방안을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. EC (European Community), 2010 : Communication from the commission Europe 2020-A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, EUROPEAN COMMISSION
  2. METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), 2008: Fundamental Plan for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society, pp1-54. (Japanese)
  3. Lee, I. S., 2014: A suggestion for Korean resource productivity management policy with calculating and analyzing its national resource productivity. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 91. pp. 40-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.012
  4. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Japan, 2012 : Resources Recycle Handbook 2013, pp. 2-46. (Japanese)
  5. KIRR, 2014: A White paper on recycling 2014, pp.63-66, S&M Media, SEOUL
  6. Chun, J. K., 2012: Legislation Study on Resource Recycling Society, KLRI, pp. 131-149
  7. EC (European Community), 2011: Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions-Roadmap to a Resource efficient Europe, EUROPEAN COMMISSION
  8. EUROSTAT, 2007: Economy-wide material flow accounting: a compilation guide. European Statistical Office
  9. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2008: Recommendation of the council on resource productivity. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
  10. Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2013: Department for environment food and rural affairs, United Kingdom. Sustainable Development Indicators
  11. BIS(Department for Business Innovation & Skills), 2009: Sustainable development action plan, United Kingdom
  12. ME (Ministry of the Environmnetal), 2013: Administrative guidelines for Waste, Japan
  13. Han, K. J., Kang, H.Y., 2012: A study to promote the recycling of the wastes generated in the industrial production process, KIET, pp. 128-173