DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Self-Diagnosis Linearity Quality Assurance Technique in Computed Tomography by Using Iodic Contrast Media

요오드 조영제를 이용한 전산화단층촬영장치의 자가진단 직선성 정도관리 기술 개발

  • 성열훈 (청주대학교 방사선학과)
  • Received : 2015.01.27
  • Accepted : 2015.03.18
  • Published : 2015.05.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a self-diagnostic linearity quality control techniques of computed tomography (CT) by using measured CT number values from the various concentrations of iodine contrast media (CM) is diluted with distilled water under each condition of the tube voltage. The equipment was used for four-channel MDCT, the iodine concentration were using 300 mgI/ml, 350 mgI/ml, 370 mgI/ml and 400mgI/ml. Dilution of CM in distilled water was increased by each 5% until the maximum CT number values were measured. We applied the tube voltages for 90 kVp, 120 kVp, 140 kVp. As a result, we was obtained to the nearest linearity as 0.993 of correlation coefficient between the iodinated CM from 5% to 25% in 400 mgI/ml and the CT number values by 90 kVp. In conclusion, the proposed self-diagnostic linearity quality assurance technique by using iodine CM can be utilized to replace the AAPM CT performance phantom.

본 연구는 요오드 함량이 다른 조영제를 증류수로 희석한 비율과 관전압의 조건별로 CT number를 측정하여 전산화단층촬영장치의 자가진단 직선성 정도관리 기술을 개발하고자 하였다. 사용된 장비는 4-채널 MDCT를 이용하였고, 요오드 조영제는 300 mgI/ml, 350 mgI/ml, 370 mgI/ml, 400 mgI/ml를 사용했다. 증류수에 대한 조영제 희석비율은 최대 농도값이 측정될 때까지 5%씩 증가하였다. 관전압은 90 kVp, 120 kVp, 140 kVp를 적용하였다. 그 결과, 90 kVp에서 400 mgI/ml 조영제가 5% ~ 25%에서 희석된 비율 구간과 CT number들 간의 상관계수가 0.993으로 가장 근사한 직선성을 구하였다. 본 연구에서 제시한 요오드 조영제를 이용한 자가진단 직선성 평가는 AAPM CT 성능평가용 팬톰을 대체할 수 있는 정도관리 방법으로 이용할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Food and Drug Adminstration, Guideline of Patients Eose in CT Examination, Series of Radiation Safty, Vol.19, pp.8-9, 2009.
  2. J. Radon, "On the Determination of Functions From Their Integral Values Along Certain Mainfolds," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol.MI-5, No.4, 1986.
  3. 보건복지부, 특수의료장비의 설치 및 품질관리에 관한 규칙, 보건복지부령 386호, 2007.
  4. J. T. Payne, E. C. McCullough, T. Stone, E. Gedgaudas, "Acceptance Testing of a Computerized Tomographic Scanner," Opt Engr, Vol.16, No.1, pp.28-31, 1977.
  5. J. I. Choi, D. G. Na, H. H. Kim, Y. M. Shin, K. J. Ahn, and J. Y. Lee, "Quality control of medical imaging," J Korean Radiol Soc, Vol.50, No.5, pp.317-331, 2004. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2004.50.5.317
  6. K. J. Jang and D. C. Kweon, "Case Study of Quality Assurance for MDCT Image Quality Evaluation Using AAPM CT Performance Phantom," J Korean Conten Soc, Vol.7, No.7, pp.114-123, 2007.
  7. M. L. Bouxsein, S. K. Boyd, B. A. Christiansen, R. E. Guldberg, K. J. Jepsen, and R. Muller, "Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography," J Bone Miner Res, Vol.25, No.7, pp.1468-1486, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.141
  8. AAPM Report No 1, Phantoms for performance evaluation and quality assurance of CT scanners, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA, 1997.
  9. J. M. Goo, "Clinical Efficacy of Pamiray? as a Nonionic Intravenous Contrast Material for Abdominal CT," J Korean Radiol Soc, Vol.49, No.3, pp.197-201, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2003.49.3.197
  10. W. Yoichi, "Derivation of linear attenuation coefficient from CT numbers for loe-energy photons," Phy Med Biol, Vol.44, pp.2201-2211, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/9/308
  11. 한동균, 김문찬, "전산화단층촬영 장치에서의 Contrst scale과 Linearity의 평가방법 및 현황조사", 대한전산화단층기술학회, 제5권, 제1호, pp.120-127, 2003.
  12. B. S. Kang, K. M. Lee, W. Y. Shim, S. C. Park, H. D. Choi, and Y. K. Cho, "Analyze for the Quality Control of General X-ray Systems in Capital region," J Korean Society of Radiological Technology, Vol.35, No.2, pp.93-102, 2012.
  13. C. S. Jeong and C. H. Lim, "The Study On Quality Control of Magnetic Resonance Imaging System," J Korean Conten Soc, Vol.9, No.6, pp.178-186, 2009.
  14. W. K. Moon, T. J. Kim, J. H. Cha, K. S. Cho, E. W. Choi, Y. J. Lee, M. H. Kim, B. K. Han, Y. H. Choe, E. K. Kim, H. Y. Choi, S. Y. Chung, S. Y. Chung, N. Cho, J. G. Im, and K. M. Yeon, "Clinical Image Evaluation of Mammograms: A National Survey," J Korean Radiol Soc, Vol.49, No.6, pp.507-511, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2003.49.6.507
  15. Y. Yamashita, Y. Komohara, M. Takahashi, M. Uchida, N. Hayabuchi, T. Shimizu, and L. Narabayashi, "Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material-a prospective randomized study," Radiology, Vol.216, No.3, pp.718-723, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se26718
  16. S. J. Thomas, "Relative electron density calibration of CT scanners for radiotherapy treatment planning," Br J Radiol, Vol.72, No.860, pp.781-786, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.72.860.10624344
  17. S. W. Lee, H. J. Kim, T. H. Kim, S. J. Jo, and C. L. Lee, "Estimation and Application of HU Values for Various Materials as a Function of Physical Factor," Korean J Med Phys, Vol.20, No.3, pp.145-151, 2009.
  18. J. Nosil, K. I. Pearce, and R. A. Stein, "Linearity and contrast scale control in computed tomography," Med. Phys, Vol.16, No.1, pp.110-113, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596396
  19. D. H. Kim, K. H. Kim, J. Y. Chung, and H. J. Cho, "The change of CT number in the sylinge by pouring order of the contrast medium and saline," J Korean Society of Computed Tomographic Technology, Vol.9, No.1, pp.145-148, 2007.