Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison Study of Runoff Projections for Yongdam Dam Watershed Using SWAT

SWAT모형을 이용한 용담댐 유역의 유량 전망 결과 비교 연구

  • Jung, Cha Mi (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Shin, Mun-Ju (Institute of Health & Environment, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Oh (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 정차미 (서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 신문주 (서울대학교 보건환경연구소) ;
  • 김영오 (서울대학교 건설환경공학부)
  • Received : 2014.12.30
  • Accepted : 2015.04.12
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, reliable future runoff projections based on RCPs for Yongdam dam watershed was performed using SWAT model, which was validated by k-fold cross validation method, and investigated the factors that cause the differences with respect to runoff projections between this study and previous studies. As a result, annual average runoff compared to baseline runoff would increase 17.7% and 26.1% in 2040s and 2080s respectively under RCP8.5 scenario, and 21.9% and 44.6% in 2040s and 2080s respectively under RCP4.5 scenario. Comparing the results to previous studies, minimum and maximum differences between runoff projections over different studies were 10.3% and 53.2%, even though runoff was projected by the same rainfall-runoff model. SWAT model has 27 parameters and physically based complex structure, so it tends to make different results by the model users' setting. In the future, it is necessary to reduce the cause of difference to generate standard runoff scenarios.

본 연구에서는 SWAT 모형을 이용해 용담댐 유역을 대상으로 k-fold cross validation 기법을 사용하여 신뢰성 있는 RCP 기반의 미래 유출량을 산정하고 이를 과거 연구와 비교하여 SWAT 모형을 이용한 기후변화 유량 전망 결과의 차이의 요인에 대해 살펴보았다. 그 결과, 총유출량은 baseline 대비 2040s, 2080s 기간에 RCP8.5 시나리오에서는 17.7%, 26.1% 증가, RCP4.5 시나리오의 경우에는 21.9%, 44.6% 증가할 것으로 전망되었다. 이를 선행 연구와 비교해 본 결과 같은 모형을 사용했음에도 불구하고 유량 전망치의 경우 연구결과 간 최저 10.3%에서 최대 53.2% 차이를 보였다. SWAT 모형에는 물리적 기반 모형으로 27개의 많은 매개변수가 존재하고 사용자마다 모형을 구축하는 과정에서 차이가 많이 발생할 수 있다. 향후 이러한 차이요인을 저감하여 표준화된 유량시나리오 생성을 위한 노력이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J.H., Yoo, C.S., and Yoon, Y.N. (2001). "An Analysis of Hydrologic Changes in Daechung Dam Basin Using GCM Simulation Results due to Global Warming." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 335-345.
  2. Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S., and Williams, J.R. (1998). "Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment Part I: Model Development1." Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
  3. Chiew, F.H.S., Teng, J., Vaze, J., Post, D.A., Perraud, J.M., Kirono, D.G.C., and Viney, N.R. (2009). "Estimating Climate Change Impact on Runoff Across Southeast Australia: Method, Results, and Implications of the Modeling Method." Water Resources Research, Vol. 45, No. 10.
  4. Kang, D.H. (2007). An Impact Assessment of Climate Change on Water Resources for the Geum River Basin. M.S. dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology. (2004). Sustainable Water Resources Research Program: Analysis and Modeling for Surface Water Hydrological Components: 21st Century Frontier R&D Program.
  6. Ministry of Science and Technology. (2007). The 21st Century Frontier R&D Program; Sustainable WaterResources Research Program;Technology for ClimateChange Impact Assessment on Water Resources.
  7. Ministry of Environment. (2006). Settlement of Global and International Environmental Issue: Prediction and Impact Assessment ofWater Cycle with Climate Change.
  8. Ministry of Education and Science Technology. (2010). Development of Climate Change Impact Analysis and Evaluation System on Korean Water Resources.
  9. Minstry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport. (2013). Climate Change Assessment and Projection for Hydrology in Korea.
  10. No, S.-H., Jung, K.S., Park, J.H., and Ryoo, K.S. (2013). "Water Supply Change Outlook for Geum River Basin Considering RCP Climate Change Scenario." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 505-517. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.5.505
  11. Park, J.H., Kwon, H.H., and No, S.-H. (2011). "Outlook of Discharge for Daecheong and Yongdam Dam Watershed Using A1B Climate Change Scenario Based RCM and SWAT Model." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 44, No. 12, pp. 929-940. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2011.44.12.929
  12. Park, J.-Y., Jung, H., Jang, C.-H., and Kim, S.J. (2014). "Assessing Climate Change Impact on Hydrological Components of Yongdam Dam Watershed Using RCP Emission Scenarios and SWAT Model." Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 19-29. https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2014.56.3.019
  13. Shin, M.-J., Guillaume, J.H., Croke, B.F., and Jakeman, A.J. (2013). "Addressing Ten Questions about Conceptual Rainfall-runoff Models with Global Sensitivity Analyses in R." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 503, pp. 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.047
  14. Shin, M.-J., Guillaume, J.H., Croke, B.F., and Jakeman, A.J. (2015). "A Review of Foundational Methods for Checking the Structural Identifiability of Models: Results for Rainfall-runoff." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 520, pp. 1-16.
  15. Vaze, J., Post, D.A., Chiew, F.H.S., Perraud, J.M., Viney, N.R., and Teng, J. (2010). "Climate Non-Stationarity-Validity of Calibrated Rainfall-Runoff Models for use in Climate Change Studies." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 394, No. 3, pp. 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.018
  16. WAMIS. (http://www.wamis.go.kr)

Cited by

  1. Assessment of Runoff and Water temperature variations under RCP Climate Change Scenario in Yongdam dam watershed, South Korea vol.32, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15681/KSWE.2016.32.2.173
  2. One-month lead dam inflow forecast using climate indices based on tele-connection vol.49, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.5.361