Journal of Nutrition and Health

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vegetable and fruit intake in one person household: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2010~2012)

국민건강영양조사 (2010~2012년)를 이용한 1인가구와 다인가구의 채소와 과일 섭취 비교

  • Lee, Jeeyoo (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Aesun (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 이지유 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 신애선 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2015.02.11
  • Accepted : 2015.05.11
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the current study was to compare the vegetable and fruit intake between one person households and those living with family. Methods: The 24-hour recall data of 14,914 persons over 20 years old who participated in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2010 to 2012 were used for the final analysis. Consumption of non-salted vegetables and fruits (${\geq}400g/day$), fruits (${\geq}200g/day$), and kimchi (${\geq}120g/day$) was compared between one person households and those living with family. Logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between potential determinants and adequate vegetable and fruit intake. Results: After additional adjustments for age, household income, and total energy intake, no statistically significant differences in likelihood of low intake of nonsalted vegetable and fruit and kimchi were observed between one person households and those living with family. (Nonsalted vegetables and fruits: odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-1.68 for the men; OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.98-1.59 for women). However one person households have greater likelihood of low intake of kimchi than those living with family in women (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.31-2.26). Conclusion: Although there were no differences in likelihood of low intake of non-salted vegetables and between individuals living alone and those living with family, women of one person households were great likelihood of low intake of kimchi compared to those living with family.

본 연구는 국민건강영양조사 5기의 2010~2012년 자료로 독립이 가능한 20세 이상 남녀 14,914명의 24시간 회상법 자료를 이용하여 1인가구와 다인가구의 비염장채소와 과일, 과일, 김치를 적게 섭취할 위험도를 비교하였다. 1인가구 남성에서 미혼의 비율이 41.5%인 반면에 1인가구 여성에서 미혼비율이 9.2%로 여성 1인가구의 90%는 기혼인 것으로 나타났다. 1인가구와 다인가구의 가구소득은 남성에서 100만원 미만이 1인가구는 42.3%, 다인가구는 12.7%를 나타내었으며, 여성에서 1인가구는 100만원 미만이 70%, 다인가구는 11.9%로 1인가구에서 저소득층이 많은 것을 알 수 있다. 1인가구와 다인가구의 교육수준은 남성에서 6년 미만이 1인가구는 20.7%, 다인가구는 15.1%를 나타내었으며, 여성에서 1인가구는 6년 미만이 66.4%, 다인가구는 24.6%로 남성에서는 큰 차이가 없지만 여성의 교육수준에서는 1인가구와 다인가구의 큰차이를 보여주었다. 20세 이상 성인남녀에서 미혼인사람보다 기혼인사람의 채소과일 섭취량이 많고, 소득수준과 교육수준이 증가 함에따라 비염장채소와 과일섭취가 400 g 이상인 사람의 비율이 증가하였다. 가구 구조에 따른 채소 과일섭취량의 관계에 대해 분석한 결과 나이와 가구소득, 총에너지 섭취량을 보정한 후 남성에서는 1인가구가 다인가구에 비해 기준치보다 적게 비염장 채소와 과일을 섭취할 위험도, 그리고 김치 섭취에서는 적게먹을 위험도의 차이가 없었다. 그러나 여성에서 김치섭취에서 보정 후에도 다인가구에 비해 1인가구가 더 적게 먹을 위험도의 차이가 있는 것을 알 수 있다. 본 연구를 통해서 남성 1인가구는 다인가구에 비해 채소와 과일을 적게 섭취할 위험도의 차이가 유의하지 않지만, 여성에서는 1인가구가 다인가구에 비해 김치를 적게 먹을 위험도가 있는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae HO. A study on one person households in Korea. J Popul Assoc Korea 1993; 16(2): 125-139.
  2. Iacovou M, Skew A. Household structure in the EU. Colchester: Institute for Social & Economic Research; 2010.
  3. Statistics Korea. Complete enumeration results of the 2010 population and housing census. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2011.
  4. Bradbury KE, Appleby PN, Key TJ. Fruit, vegetable, and fiber intake in relation to cancer risk: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Am J Clin Nutr 2014; 100 Suppl 1: 394S-398S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.071357
  5. Leenders M, Boshuizen HC, Ferrari P, Siersema PD, Overvad K, Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Boutron-Ruault MC, Dossus L, Dartois L, Kaaks R, Li K, Boeing H, Bergmann MM, Trichopoulou A, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Palli D, Krogh V, Panico S, Tumino R, Vineis P, Peeters PH, Weiderpass E, Engeset D, Braaten T, Redondo ML, Agudo A, Sanchez MJ, Amiano P, Huerta JM, Ardanaz E, Drake I, Sonestedt E, Johansson I, Winkvist A, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Key TJ, Bradbury KE, Johansson M, Licaj I, Gunter MJ, Murphy N, Riboli E, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB. Fruit and vegetable intake and cause-specific mortality in the EPIC study. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29(9): 639-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9945-9
  6. Oyebode O, Gordon-Dseagu V, Walker A, Mindell JS. Fruit and vegetable consumption and all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality: analysis of Health Survey for England data. J Epidemiol Community Health 2014; 68(9): 856-862. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-203500
  7. Wang X, Ouyang Y, Liu J, Zhu M, Zhao G, Bao W, Hu FB. Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ 2014; 349: g4490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4490
  8. Lee JS, Kim J. Vegetable intake in Korea: data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1998, 2001 and 2005. Br J Nutr 2010; 103(10): 1499-1506. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509993527
  9. Ministry of Health and Welfare; National Cancer Center (KR). Cancer facts & figures 2013 in the Republic of Korea. Goyang: National Cancer Center; 2013.
  10. International Phytonutrient Symposium. Phytonutrient past, present and future-value proposition as a life span essential. 2011 Korea & China Joint International Phytonutrient Symposium; 2011 Oct 12; Seoul. [place unknown]: International Phytonutrient Symposium; 2011.
  11. Giskes K, Turrell G, Patterson C, Newman B. Socio-economic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among Australian adolescents and adults. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5(5): 663-669. https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2002339
  12. Hong SA, Kim K, Kim MK. Trends in the inequality of fruit and vegetable consumption between education levels indicated by the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 2012; 66(8): 942-949. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.39
  13. Choi J, Moon HK. Comparison of dietary patterns by sex and urbanization in different economic status. Korean J Community Nutr 2008; 13(3): 346-358.
  14. Kim OY, Moon YK. Housing analysis of one person household. Resid Environ 2009; 7(2): 37-53.
  15. Kwon SY, Park HY. Analysis on affecting factors for the housing environment satisfaction of one-person households in Seoul. Hous Stud Rev 2014; 22(1): 77-104.
  16. Agudo A. Measuring intake of fruit and vegetables. Background paper for the Joint FAO/WHO Workshop on Fruit and Vegetables for Health, 1-3 September 2004, Kobem Japan [Internet]. [place unknown]: World Health Organization; 2005 [cited 2014 Dec 13]. Available from: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/f&v_intake_measurement.pdf.
  17. Kwon JH, Shim JE, Park MK, Paik HY. Evaluation of fruits and vegetables intake for prevention of chronic disease in Korean adults aged 30 years and over: using the Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES III), 2005. Korean J Nutr 2009; 42(2): 146-157. https://doi.org/10.4163/kjn.2009.42.2.146
  18. World Cancer Research Fund (GB); American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington, D.C.: American Institute for Cancer Research; 2007.
  19. The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans. Seoul: The Korean Nutrition Society; 2010.
  20. Son SM, Park YS, Lim HJ, Kim SB, Jeong YS. Sodium intakes of Korean adults with 24-hour urine analysis and dish frequency questionnaire and comparison of sodium intakes according to the regional area and dish group. Korean J Community Nutr 2007; 12(5): 545-558.
  21. Casagrande SS, Wang Y, Anderson C, Gary TL. Have Americans increased their fruit and vegetable intake? The trends between 1988 and 2002. Am J Prev Med 2007; 32(4): 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.002
  22. Nagata C, Takatsuka N, Shimizu N, Shimizu H. Sodium intake and risk of death from stroke in Japanese men and women. Stroke 2004; 35(7): 1543-1547. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000130425.50441.b0
  23. Umesawa M, Iso H, Date C, Yamamoto A, Toyoshima H, Watanabe Y, Kikuchi S, Koizumi A, Kondo T, Inaba Y, Tanabe N, Tamakoshi A; JACC Study Group. Relations between dietary sodium and potassium intakes and mortality from cardiovascular disease: the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risks. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88(1): 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/88.1.195
  24. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1990.

Cited by

  1. An iodine database establishment and iodine intake in Korean adults: Based on the 1998~2014 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey vol.50, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2017.50.6.624
  2. Development of a Food Exchange Table and Food Pattern for Nutritionally Balanced Menu Planning vol.23, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2018.23.5.411
  3. Exploring the Direction of Home Economics Education in Preparation for the Generalization of a One-Person Household vol.57, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2019.006
  4. 한국 성인의 국물 음식류 섭취에 따른 식생활 평가 : 2011~2014 국민건강영양조사 자료를 이용하여 vol.49, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2016.49.5.335
  5. 신선 배에 대한 인지가 배와 배 가공 식품의 구매에 미치는 영향 vol.32, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7318/kjfc/2017.32.5.394
  6. 중년 남성에서 과일·채소 섭취량에 따른 대사증후군 위험도 비교 - 제6기(2013~2015년) 국민건강영양조사 자료 이용 - vol.30, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2017.30.5.1048
  7. Analysis of Korean Traditional Dietary (Hansik) Consumption Patterns Focusing on Households’ Characteristics vol.28, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2018.12.28.6.453
  8. 국민건강영양조사(2013-2014년) 자료에 근거한 가구원수별 구성원의 영양상태 및 대사증후군 유병율 평가 vol.24, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2019.24.3.232
  9. The changing role of convenience stores in South Korea vol.121, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-07-2018-0467
  10. 1인가구의 고용형태 및 연령별 혼자 식사(혼밥)관련 식행동 비교 vol.24, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2019.24.5.408
  11. 포도소비수준에 따른 포도선택속성 중요도-만족도 분석 vol.34, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7318/kjfc/2019.34.5.595
  12. 1인 가구 성인의 가정간편식 이용과 식습관 실태 vol.24, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2019.24.6.476
  13. 일인 가구의 성별에 따른 미충족 의료현황과 관련 요인 vol.26, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2020.03.23
  14. 한국 성인 남녀의 채소, 과일 섭취와 천식 유병률의 관련성: 2013-2017 국민건강영양조사 자료를 이용하여 vol.53, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.4.406
  15. 한국 청소년의 과일, 채소 섭취빈도와 정신건강: 제10-13차 (2014-2017) 청소년건강행태조사를 이용하여 vol.53, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.5.518
  16. Trends and Dietary Assessment According to Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Korean Elderly People: Analysis Based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1998, 2008, and 2018 vol.9, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111712
  17. 국민건강영양조사(2013~2015년)를 이용한 가구유형에 따른 중장년층의 만성질환 위험요인 연관성 분석 vol.34, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2021.34.1.088
  18. Is It What They Eat or How Much They Eat That Matters More in Adults with Food Insecurity in a Wealthy-Country Context? vol.13, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030851
  19. 청년 1인가구를 위한 식생활교육 프로그램 개발 vol.33, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.151
  20. Comparison of Dietary Behaviors and the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Single- and Multi-Person Households among Korean Adults vol.9, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091116
  21. Analysis of Fruit Consumption and the Korean Healthy Eating Index of Adults Using the 2018 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey vol.50, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2021.50.10.1124