Review of Flexible brace(SpineCor Brace) in Pubmed, CNKI and Journal of Korean Oriental Medicine ; RCTs(Randomized controlled trials) Review

스파인코 보조기의 척추 측만증에 대한 효과 고찰

  • Received : 2015.05.26
  • Accepted : 2015.06.14
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

Objectives : To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of Flexible brace(SpineCor Brace). Methods : CNKI, PubMed databases and Korean Journal of Oriental Medicine in 1999-2014 were searched for studies on SpineCor. This study researched 4 randomized controlled trial studies. Results : The results suggested that the SpineCor brace reduced the probability of the progression of early idiopathic scoliosis comparing with its natural history or rigid brace. But some studies showed that there is no significant difference between SpineCor and rigid brace. Conclusions : These results indicate that SpineCor have obvious effects on treatment of scoliosis and no adverse reactions, therefore we need to study more researches on SpineCor.

Keywords

References

  1. El-Hawary R, Chukwunyerenwa C. Update on evaluation and treatment of scoliosis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014; 61(6):1223-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2014.08.007
  2. Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Romano M, Vasiliadis ES. Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(13):1285-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc48f4
  3. Hresko MT. Clinical practice. Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(9):834-41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1209063
  4. Negrini S, Carabalona R. Social acceptability of treatments for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. Scoliosis. 2006;1:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-1-14
  5. Weiss HR, Negrini S, Rigo M, Kotwicki T, Hawes MC, Grivas TB, Maruyama T, Landauer F; (SOSORT guideline committee). Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines). Scoliosis. 2006;1:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-1-5
  6. Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, Circo AB, de Mauroy JC, Durmala J, et al. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis. 2012;7(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-3
  7. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(16):1512-21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307337
  8. Negrini S, Zaina F, Atanasio S. BRACE MAP, a proposal for a new classification of braces. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;140:299-302.
  9. Coillard C, Leroux MA, Zabjek KF, Rivard CH. SpineCor-a non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: post-treatment results. Eur Spine J. 2003; 12(2):141-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0467-x
  10. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clinical Trials. 1996;17(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
  11. SpineCor International. SpineCor Brace. http://www.spinecor.com/ForProfessionals/IntroductionToSpineCor.aspx 2015.06.03
  12. C. COILLARD, A. B. CIRCO, C. H. RIVARD. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis versus treatment with the SpineCor brace. Sosort Award 2011 winner. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;50(5):479-87.
  13. Guo J, Lam TP, Wong MS, Ng BK, Lee KM, Liu KL, Hung LH, Lau AH, Sin SW, Kwok WK, Yu FW, Qiu Y, Cheng JC. A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(12):2650-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3146-1
  14. Wong MS, Cheng CY, Ng BK, Lam TP, Sin SW, Lee-Shum LF, Chow HK, Tam YP. The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the gait pattern of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait Posture. 2008;27(2):189-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.007
  15. Wong MS, Cheng JC, Lam TP, Ng BK, Sin SW, Lee-Shum SL, Chow DH, Tam SY. The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(12):1360-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817329d9
  16. Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, et al. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis. 2012;7(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-3
  17. Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D'Amato CR, Thompson GH: Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies. SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine 2005: 2068-2075.
  18. Kim HJ, Blanco JS, Widmann RF. Update on the management of idiopathic scoliosis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21(1):55-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e328320a929
  19. Toru Maruyama, Yosuke Kobayashi, Makoto Miura, Yusuke Nakao. Effectiveness of brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2015;10(Suppl 2):S12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S12
  20. Bohl DD, Telles CJ, Golinvaux NS, Basques BA, DeLuca PA, Grauer JN. Effectiveness of Providence nighttime bracing in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthopedics. 2014; 37(12):e1085-90. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20141124-56
  21. Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Marzetti E, Giordano M, Falciglia F, Aulisa L. Brace treatment in juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study in accordance with the SRS criteria for bracing studies - SOSORT award 2013 winner. 2014;9:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-9-3