Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology (한국항행학회논문지)

The Korean Navigation Institute (한국항행학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Reference Station Distribution Impact on KASS UDRE Performance

기준국 배치에 따른 한국 위성기반 보강 시스템 UDRE 성능 영향 분석

  • Yun, Youngsun (Satellite Navigation Team, Korea Aerospace Research Institute)
  • 윤영선 (한국항공우주연구원 위성항법팀)
  • Received : 2015.05.17
  • Accepted : 2015.06.11
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the distribution of SBAS reference stations is one of the most important factors that affect the system performance, the effects of the distribution should be analyzed carefully from the beginning of the program to develop the system conforming to given performance requirements. The reference stations of KASS, the Korean SBAS, are planned to be installed only inside South Korea, which limits the number and area of those. It differentiates KASS from others that have much larger sites. In this paper, the author analyzes the performance impact on UDRE and ${\delta}UDRE$ for GPS and GEO due to the limitations by a series of simulations, which showed that the UDRE performance depends on the diversity of the reference station distribution and the impact on the GEO UDRE is significant. The paper concludes by providing KASS design and development considerations to minimize the possible performance risks due to the limitations of KASS reference station distribution.

SBAS 기준국의 배치는 시스템 성능에 영향을 미치는 가장 중요한 요소 중 하나이므로 기준국 배치가 주어진 성능 요구사항을 만족시킬 수 있는지 시스템 개발 초기에 신중하게 분석하여야 한다. 특히 한국형 SBAS로 개발이 진행 중인 KASS의 기준국은 대한민국 내에 설치될 예정이므로 기준국의 개수와 영역이 제한될 수밖에 없으며 이는 넓게 기준국을 배치할 수 있는 타 SBAS 시스템과 구별이 되는 부분이다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 한계로 인한 GPS 및 GEO에 대한 UDRE와 ${\delta}UDRE$ 성능 영향을 시뮬레이션을 통하여 분석하였으며 그 결과 UDRE 성능은 기준국이 얼마나 넓게 분포하는지에 크게 영향을 받으며 특히 GEO UDRE에 미치는 영향이 매우 심각한 것을 확인하였다. 이 결과를 바탕으로 기준국 배치 영향으로 인한 시스템 성능 위험을 최소화하기 위한 KASS설계 및 개발 고려 사항을 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. ICAO, Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Volume I-Radio Navigation Aids, International Standards and Recommended Practices, Amendment 87, Nov. 2012.
  2. RTCA SC-159, Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Global Positioning System/Wide Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment (DO-229D), RTCA Inc., Dec. 13, 2006.
  3. T. Walter, P. Enge and B. DeCleene, "Integrity lessons from the WAAS integrity performance panel (WIPP)," in Proceedings of the 2003 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Anaheim: CA, pp. 183-194, Jan. 2003.
  4. T. Wu and S. Peck, "An analysis of satellite integrity monitoring improvement for WAAS," in Proceedings of the 15th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2002), Portland: OR, pp.756-765, Sep. 2002.
  5. W. Werner, U. Rossbach and R. Wolf, "Algorithms and performance of the EGNOS CPF independent check set," in Proceedings of the 13th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2000), Salt Lake City: UT, pp.219-229, Sept. 2000.
  6. T. Walter, A. Hansen and P. Enge, "Message type 28," in Proceedings of the 2001 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Long Beach: CA, pp. 522-532, Jan. 2001.
  7. D. Kim, A Study on Correction Generation Algorithms for Wide Area Differential GNSS, Ph. D. dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Oct. 2006.
  8. M. Grewal, E. Carolipio and M. Bailey, "Comparison of GEO and GPS orbit determination," in Proceedings of the 15th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2002), Portland: OR, pp. 790-799, Sept. 2002.
  9. N. Pandya, J. Wu and M. Grewal, "Dependence of GEO UDRE on ground station geometries," in Proceedings of the 2000 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Anaheim: CA, pp. 80-90, Jan. 2000.
  10. K. Shallberg and F. Sheng, "WAAS measurement processing; current design and potential improvements," in Proceedings of IEEE/ION PLANS 2008, Monterey: CA, pp. 253-262, May 2008.
  11. Y. Yun, D. Kim, C. Pyong and C. Kee, "Performance analysis of Korean WADGPS algorithms with NDGPS data," in Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2004), Long Beach: CA, pp. 1329-1339, Sept. 2004.
  12. K. Shallberg, P. Shloss, E. Altshuler and L. Tahmazyan, "WAAS measurement processing, reducing the effects of multipath," in Proceedings of the 14th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2001), Salt Lake City: UT, pp.2334-2340, Sept. 2001.
  13. E. Bang and J. Lee, "Considerations on ionospheric correction and integrity algorithm for Korean SBAS," Journal of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 17-23, Mar. 2014. https://doi.org/10.11003/JPNT.2014.3.1.017
  14. Y. Yun and M. Heo, "A feasibility study of a GNSS jammer detection and localization architecture using airborne sensor networks", in Proceedings of the International Symposium on GNSS 2014, Jeju, Korea, pp. 334-349, October 2014.
  15. S. S. Jan, "Matlab simulation toolset for SBAS availability analysis," in Proceedings of the 14th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2001), Salt Lake City: UT, pp. 2366-2375, Sept. 2001.
  16. William J. Hughes Technical Center WAAS Test Team [Internet]. Available: http://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov/.
  17. E. Bang, J. Lee, J. Lee, J. Seo and T. Walter, "Constructing ionospheric irregularity threat model for Korean SBAS," in Proceedings of the ION 2013 Pacific PNT Meeting, Honolulu: HI, pp. 296-306, Apr. 2013.
  18. Y. Yun, "Influence of reference station distribution on the Korean SBAS performance," in Proceedings of the ION 2015 Pacific PNT Meeting, Honolulu: HI, Apr. 2015.

Cited by

  1. KASS Message Scheduler Design vol.5, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11003/JPNT.2016.5.4.193