DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cost minimization of prestressed steel trusses considering shape and size variables

  • Aydin, Zekeriya (Department of Civil Engineering, Namik Kemal University) ;
  • Cakir, Ebru (Department of Civil Engineering, Namik Kemal University)
  • Received : 2014.04.23
  • Accepted : 2014.12.18
  • Published : 2015.07.25

Abstract

There are many studies on the optimization of steel trusses in literature; and, a large number of them include a shape optimization. However, only a few of these studies are focused on the prestressed steel trusses. Therefore, this paper aims to determine the amounts of the material and cost savings in steel plane trusses in the case of prestressing. A parallel-chord simply supported steel truss is handled as an example to evaluate the used approach. It is considered that prestressing tendon is settled under the bottom bar, between two end supports, using deviators. Cross-sections of the truss members and height of the truss are taken as the design variables. The prestress losses are calculated in two steps as instantaneous losses and time-dependent losses. Tension increment in prestressing tendon due to the external loads is also considered. A computer program based on genetic algorithm is developed to solve the optimization problem. The handled truss is optimized for different span lengths and different tendon eccentricities using the coded program. The effects of span length and eccentricity of tendon on prestressed truss optimization are investigated. The results of different solutions are compared with each other and those of the non-prestressed solution. It is concluded that the amounts of the material and the cost of a steel plane truss can be reduced up to 19.9% and 14.6%, respectively, by applying prestressing.

Keywords

References

  1. AISC-ASD (1989), Manual of Steel Construction-Allowable Stress Design, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. Albrecht, P. and Lenwari, A. (2008), "Design of prestressing tendons for strengthening steel truss bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 13(5), 449-454. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:5(449)
  3. Arda, T.S. and Yardimci, N. (2000), Prestressing in Steel Structure, Birsen Publishing Company, Istanbul, Turkey.
  4. Aydin, Z. and Ayvaz, Y. (2010), "Optimum topology and shape design of prestressed concrete bridge girders using a genetic algorithm", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 41(1), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0404-2
  5. Bathe, K.J. (1996), Finite element procedures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  6. Belletti, B. and Gasperi, A. (2010), "Behavior of prestressed steel beams", J. Struct. Eng., 136(9), 1131-1139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000208
  7. Cheng, J. (2010), "Optimum design of steel truss arch bridges using a hybrid genetic algorithm", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(8-9), 1011-1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.007
  8. Cakir, E. (2011), "Minimum-weighted design of prestressed steel truss beams", Msc. Thesis; Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey.
  9. Dede, T., Bekiroglu, S. and Ayvaz, Y. (2011), "Weight minimization of trusses with genetic algorithm", Appl. Soft Comput., 11(2), 2565-2575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.10.006
  10. Dong, S. and Yuan, X. (2007), "Pretension process analysis of prestressed space grid structures", J. Constr. Steel Res., 63(3), 406-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.04.006
  11. Goldberg, D.E. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-esley Publishing Company, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  12. Guo, H.Y. and Li, Z.L. (2011), "Structural topology optimization of high-voltage transmission tower with discrete variables", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 43(6), 851-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0561-3
  13. Han, K.B. and Park, S.K. (2005), "Parametric study of truss bridges by the post-tensioning method", Can. J. Civ. Eng., 32(2), 420-429. https://doi.org/10.1139/l04-096
  14. Hanaor, A. (1988), "Prestressed pin-jointed structures-flexibility analysis and prestress design", Comp. Struct., 28(6), 757-769. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(88)90416-6
  15. Holland, J.H. (1975), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  16. Kaveh, A. and Kalatjari, V. (2003), "Topology optimization of trusses using genetic algorithm, force method and graph theory", Int. J. Numer. Method. Eng., 58(5), 771-791. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.800
  17. Kirsch, U. (1972), "Optimum design of prestressed beams", Comp. Struct., 2(4), 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(72)90009-0
  18. Kociecki, M. and Adeli, H. (2013), "Two-phase genetic algorithm for size optimization of free-form steel space-frame roof structures", J. Constr. Steel Res., 90, 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.027
  19. Levy, R. and Hanaor, A. (1992), "Optimal design of prestressed trusses", Comp. Struct., 43(4), 741-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(92)90517-4
  20. Ozturk, A.Z. (1979), "Design and construction principles of prestressed steel structures", Ph.D. Thesis; Istanbul State Engineering and Architecture Academy, Istanbul, Turkey.
  21. Park, S., Kim, T., Kim, K. and Hong, S.N. (2010), "Flexural behavior of steel I-beam prestressed with externally unbonded tendons", J. Constr. Steel Res. 66(1), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.07.013
  22. Rahami, H., Kaveh, A. and Gholipour, Y. (2008), "Sizing, geometry and topology optimization of trusses via force method and genetic algorithm", Eng. Struct., 30(9), 2360-2369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.012
  23. Rajan, S.D. (1995), "Sizing, shapes and topology design optimization of trusses using genetic algorithm", J. Struct. Eng., 121(10), 1480-1486. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:10(1480)
  24. Rajeev, S. and Krishnamoorthy, C.S. (1992), "Discrete optimization of structures using genetic algorithm", J. Struct. Eng., 118(5), 1233-1250. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1233)
  25. Rajeev, S. and Krishnamoorthy, C.S. (1997), "Genetic algorithms-based methodologies for design optimization of trusses", J. Struct. Eng., 123(3), 350-358. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:3(350)
  26. Ronghe, G.N. and Gupta, L.M. (1999), "Study of tendon profile on the analysis and design of prestressed steel beams", Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures, Hong Kong, China, December.
  27. TS3233 (1979), Building code requirements for prestressed concrete; Turkish Standard Institution, Ankara, Turkey.
  28. You, Z. (1997), "Displacement control of prestressed structures", Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng., 144(1-2), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01164-4

Cited by

  1. Weight minimization of truss structures with sizing and layout variables using integrated particle swarm optimizer vol.23, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1348982
  2. Testing specimen effect on shrinkage of lightweight concrete vol.171, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.16.00125
  3. Optimization of long span portal frames using spatially distributed surrogates vol.24, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.2.227
  4. Size effect and age factor in mechanical properties of BST Light Weight Concrete vol.177, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.115
  5. Parametric optimization of pre-stressed steel arch-shaped trusses with ties vol.451, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/451/1/012060
  6. Rao-3 algorithm for the weight optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall vol.20, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.20.6.527