DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of the restoration effect on the structural behavior of masonry arch bridges

  • Altunisik, A.C. (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Bayraktar, A. (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Genc, A.F. (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University)
  • Received : 2014.06.05
  • Accepted : 2014.08.31
  • Published : 2015.07.25

Abstract

In this paper, it is aimed to investigate the restoration effect on the structural behavior of masonry arch bridges. Dandalaz masonry arch bridge located on the 4km east of Karacasu town of Aydin, Turkey is selected as a numerical example. The construction year of the bridge is not fully known, but the bridge is dated back to 15th century. Considering the current situation, it can be easily seen that the structural elements such as arch, side walls and timber blocks are heavily damaged and the bridge is unserviceable. Firstly finite element model of the bridge is constituted to reflect the current situation (before restoration) using building survey drawings. After, restoration project is explained and finite element model is reconstituted (after restoration). The structural responses of the bridge are obtained before and after restoration under dead load, live load and dynamic earthquake loads. For both conditions, maximum displacements, maximum-minimum principal stresses and maximum-minimum elastic strains are given with detail using contours diagrams and compared with each other to determine the restoration effect. From the study, it can be seen that the maximum internal forces are consisted under dynamic loads before and after restoration. Also, the restoration projects and studies have important and positive effects on the structural response of the bridge to transfer these structures to future.

Keywords

References

  1. ANSYS (2008), Swanson Analysis System. U.S.A.
  2. Bathe, K.J. (1996), Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  3. Bayraktar, A., Altunisik, A.C., Turker, T. and Sevim, B. (2007), "The model Updating of historical masonry bridges using operational modal analysis method", Proceedings of the 1st Reinforcement and Transfer into the Future of Historical Structures, Ankara, Turkey.
  4. Bayraktar, A., Turker, T., Sevim, B., Altunisik, A.C. and Yildirim, F. (2009a), "Modal parameter identification of Hagia Sophia Bell-Tower via ambient vibration test", J. Nondestruct. Eval., 28(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-009-0045-9
  5. Bayraktar, A., Birinci, F., Altunisik, A.C., Turker, T. and Sevim, B. (2009b), "Finite element model updating of Senyuva Historical Arch Bridge using ambient vibration tests, The Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng., 4(4), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.177-185
  6. Betti, M., Drosopoulos, G.A. and Stavroulakis, G.E. (2007), "On the collapse analysis of single span masonry/stone arch bridges with fill interaction", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Arch Bridges, ARCH'07, 617-624, Portugal.
  7. Brencich, A. and Sabia, D. (2008), "Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: The Tanaro Bridge", Constr. Build. Mater., 22, 2087-2099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.031
  8. Frunzio, G., Monaco, M. and Gesualdo, A. (2001), "3D FEM analysis of a Roman Arch Bridge", Historical Constr., 591-598.
  9. Gonen, H., Dogan, M., Karacasu, M., Ozbasaran, H. and Gokdemir, H. (2013), "Structural failures in retrofit historical masonry arch bridge", Eng. Fail. Anal., 35, 334-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.024
  10. Leon, J. and Espejo, S.R. (2007), "Load test to collapse on the masonry arch bridge at Urnieta", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Arch Bridges, ARCH'07, 969-977, Portugal.
  11. Milani, G. and Lourenco, P.B. (2012), "3D non-linear behavior of masonry arch bridges", Comput. Struct., 110-111, 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.008
  12. Paegliti, A. and Paeglitis, A. (2009), "Restoration of masonry arch bridge over Venta River in Kuldiga", Proceedings of the Starptautiska Baltijas Celu Conference, 24-26 August, Latvia.
  13. Pela, L., Aprile, A. and Benedetti, A. (2013), "Comparison of seismic assessment procedures for masonry arch bridges", Constr. Build. Mater., 38, 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.046
  14. Reccia, E., Milani, G., Cecchi, A. and Tralli, A. (2014), "Full 3d homogenization approach to investigate the behavior of masonry arch bridges: the venice trans-lagoon railway bridge", Constr. Build. Mater., 66, 567-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.096
  15. Smoljanovic, H., Zivaljic, N. and Nikolic, Z. (2013), "A combined finite-discrete element analysis of dry stone masonry structures, Eng. Struct., 52, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.010
  16. Tao, Y., Stratford, T.J. and Chen, J.F. (2011), "Behaviour of a masonry arch bridge repaired using fibre-Reinforced polymer composites", Eng. Struct., 33(5), 1594-1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.029
  17. Toker, S. and Unay, A.I. (2004), "Mathematical modelling and finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges", J. Sci. Gazi Univ., 17(2), 129-139.
  18. Ural, A., Oruc, S., Dogangun, A. and Tuluk, O.I. (2008), "Turkish historical arch bridges and their deteriorations and failures", Eng. Fail. Anal., 15(1-2), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.01.006
  19. [URL-1]PEER (2013), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data.

Cited by

  1. Probabilistic analysis of historic masonry bridges to random ground motion by Monte Carlo Simulation using Response Surface Method vol.134, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.101
  2. Structural response of historical masonry arch bridges under different arch curvature considering soil-structure interaction vol.18, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.18.2.141
  3. Assessment of historic stone arch bridge characterisation: experiments and numerical model vol.172, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.18.00014
  4. Out-of-plane seismic failure assessment of spandrel walls in long-span masonry stone arch bridges using cohesive interface vol.18, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.1.083
  5. Minimum cost strengthening of existing masonry arch railway bridges vol.75, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.75.2.271
  6. In situ dynamic investigation on the historic "İskenderpaşa" masonry mosque with non-destructive testing vol.26, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.26.1.001
  7. Nonlinear soil deformability effects on the seismic damage mechanisms of brick and stone masonry arch bridges vol.30, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789520974423