DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of a Homogeneous Segment for Short-term Traffic Count Efficiency Using a Statistical Approach

통계적인 기법을 활용한 동질성구간에 따른 교통량 수시조사 효율화 연구

  • Jung, YooSeok ;
  • Oh, JuSam (ICT Convergence and Integration Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology)
  • 정유석 (한국건설기술연구원 ICT융합연구소) ;
  • 오주삼 (한국건설기술연구원 ICT융합연구소)
  • Received : 2015.06.08
  • Accepted : 2015.08.04
  • Published : 2015.08.17

Abstract

PURPOSES: This study has been conducted to determine a homogeneous segment and integration to improve the efficiency of short-term traffic count. We have also attempted to reduce the traffic monitoring budget. METHODS: Based on the statistical approach, a homogeneous segment in the same road section is determined. Statistical analysis using t-test, mean difference, and correlation coefficient are carried out for 10-year-long (2004-2013) short-term count traffic data and the MAPE of fresh data (2014) are evaluated. The correlation coefficient represents a trend in traffic count, while the mean difference and t-score represent an average traffic count. RESULTS : The statistical analysis suggests that the number of target segments varies with the criteria. The correlation coefficient of more than 30% of the adjacent segment is higher than 0.8. A mean difference of 36.2% and t-score of 19.5% for adjacent segments are below 20% and 2.8, respectively. According to the effectiveness analysis, the integration criteria of the mean difference have a higher effect as compared to the t-score criteria. Thus, the mean difference represents a traffic volume similarity. CONCLUSIONS : The integration of 47 road segments from 882 adjacent road segments indicate 8.87% of MAPE, which is within an acceptable range. It can reduce the traffic monitoring budget and increase the count to improve an accuracy of traffic volume estimation.

Keywords

References

  1. Bennett, D., CROFT, P., MCTIERNAN, D., Shah, A., others, 2009. Guide to traffic management part 3: traffic studies and analysis.
  2. Davis, G., Guan, Y., 1996. Bayesian Assignment of Coverage Count Locations to Factor Groups and Estimation of Mean Daily Traffic. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1542, 30-37. doi:10.3141/1542-05
  3. Devore, J.L., 2011. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, 8 edition. ed. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.
  4. FHWA, 2013. Traffic Monitoring Guide.
  5. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2013. Traffic Monitoring Guideline.
  6. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2015. 2014 Annual Traffic Volume Report.
  7. Oh Ju Sam, Lim Sung Han, Cho Yoon Ho, 2005. Division of Homogeneous Road Sections for National Highway by Genetic Algorithms. Korean Society of Road Engineers 7, 41-47.
  8. Robichaud, K., Gordon, M., 2003. Assessment of data-collection techniques for highway agencies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1855, 129-135.
  9. Wang, C. (Ross), Tsai, Y. (James), 2013. Use of Reduction- Effectiveness Ratios to Evaluate Reduced Traffic Data Collection Plans. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2339, 13-18.
  10. Yang, S., Davis, G.A., 2002. Bayesian estimation of classified mean daily traffic. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 36, 365-382. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00008-8
  11. Zhao, F., Park, N., 2004. Using geographically weighted regression models to estimate annual average daily traffic. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1879, 99-107.
  12. Zhong, M., Bagheri, E., Christie, J., 2012. Improving group assignment and AADT estimation accuracy of short-term traffic counts using historical seasonal patterns & Bayesian statistics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 43, 607-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.134