Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analytical study of composite beams with different arrangements of channel shear connectors

  • Received : 2014.04.26
  • Accepted : 2015.05.13
  • Published : 2015.08.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Channels are implemented in composite beams as shear connectors in two arrangements, face to face and back to back. No relevant explanation is found in the design codes to clarify the preference of the mentioned arrangements. Besides, the designers do not have a common opinion on this subject; i.e., some recommend the face to face and others, back to back status. In this research, channel shear connectors in composite beams are studied analytically for both arrangements using ABAQUS software. For this purpose, they have been modeled in simply supported beams in the arrangements of face to face and back to back; their effects on the crack initiation load of concrete slabs were monitored. The stiffness values of composite beams were also compared in the two arrangements using force-displacement curve; the results are relatively the same in both cases. Furthermore, the effects of compressive strength of concrete, channel size, length and spacing of channels as well as steel type of channels on the performance of composite beams have been investigated. According to the results obtained in this research, the face to face status shows better performance in comparison with that of back to back, considering the load of concrete fracturing.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe, H. and Hosaka, T. (2002), "Flexible shear connectors for railway composite girder bridge", ASCE Compos. Construct. Steel Concrete IV, 71-80.
  2. AISC (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction; Chicago, IL, USA.
  3. Baran, E. and Topkaya, C. (2012), "An experimental study on channel type shear connectors", J. Construct. Steel Res., 74, 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.02.015
  4. Baran, E. and Topkaya, C. (2014), "Behavior of steel-concrete partially composite beams with channel type shear connectors", J. Construct. Steel Res., 97, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.01.017
  5. Brendel, G. (1964), "Strength of the compression slab of T-beams subject to simple bending", ACI J. Proceedings, 61(3), 57-76.
  6. Chung, K.F. and Chan, C.K. (2011), "Advanced finite element modeling of composite beams with high strength materials and deformable shear connectors", Procedia Eng., 14, 1114-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.140
  7. Code, C.-F.M. (1990), Model Code for Concrete Structures, Bulletin d'Information, (117-E).
  8. Hibbitt, D., Karlsson, B. and Sorenson, P. (2011), Simulia ABAQUS 6.11 Users' Manual.
  9. Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S. and Onate, E. (1989), "A plastic-damage model for concrete", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 25(3), 299-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4
  10. Maleki, S. and Bagheri, S. (2008a), "Behavior of channel shear connectors, Part I: Experimental study", J. Construct. Steel Res., 64(12), 1333-1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.010
  11. Maleki, S. and Bagheri, S. (2008b), "Behavior of channel shear connectors, Part II: Analytical study", J. Construct. Steel Res., 64(12), 1341-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.006
  12. Maleki, S. and Mahoutian, M. (2009), "Experimental and analytical study on channel shear connectors in fiber-reinforced concrete", J. Construct. Steel Res., 65(8-9), 1787-1793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.04.008
  13. Nguyen, Q.H., Hjiaj, M., Uy, B. and Guezouli, S. (2009), "Analysis of composite beams in the hogging moment regions using a mixed finite element formulation", J. Construct. Steel Res., 65(3), 737-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.07.026
  14. Pashan, A. (2006), "Behavior of channel shear connectors: Push-out tests", M.Sc. Thesis; University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
  15. Salmon, C.G. and Johnson, J.E. (1996), Steel Structure: Design and Behavior, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
  16. Shariati, M., RamliSulong, N.H. and Arabnejad Khanouki, M.M. (2012), "Experimental assessment of channel shear connectors under monotonic and fully reversed cyclic loading in high strength concrete", Mater. Des., 34, 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.008
  17. Shariati, M., RamliSulong, N.H., Suhatril, M., Shariati, A., Arabnejad Khanouki, M.M. and Sinaei, H. (2013), "Comparison of behavior between channel and angle shear connectors under monotonic and fully reversed cyclic loading", Construct. Build. Mater., 38, 582-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.050
  18. Vasdravellis, G., Uy, B., Tan, E.L. and Kirkland, B. (2012), "The effects of axial tension on the hogging-moment regions of composite beams", J. Construct. Steel Res., 68(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.06.017
  19. Viest, I.M. (1974), "Composite steel-concrete construction", ASCE J. Struct. Div., 100(5), 1085-1139.

Cited by

  1. Experimental investigation of steel-concrete composite beams with different degrees of shear connection under monotonic and fatigue loads vol.21, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217717121
  2. Design and modelling of pre-cast steel-concrete composites for resilient railway track slabs vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.3.537
  3. Influence of shear bolt connections on modular precast steel-concrete composites for track support structures vol.27, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.5.647
  4. Computational investigation of the comparative analysis of cylindrical barns subjected to earthquake vol.28, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.4.439
  5. Shear capacity equation for channel shear connectors in steel-concrete composite beams vol.28, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.4.483
  6. Strengthening of bolted shear joints in industrialized ferrocement construction vol.28, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.6.681
  7. Application of ANFIS technique on performance of C and L shaped angle shear connectors vol.22, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.22.3.335
  8. Practical use of computational building information modeling in repairing and maintenance of hospital building- case study vol.22, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.22.5.575
  9. An experimental study on the effect of CFRP on behavior of reinforce concrete beam column connections vol.30, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.5.433
  10. Flexural performance of composite walls under out-of-plane loads vol.34, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.4.525
  11. Behavior of grouped stud shear connectors between precast high-strength concrete slabs and steel beams vol.34, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.6.837
  12. Prediction of total sediment load: A case study of Wadi Arbaat in eastern Sudan vol.26, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.26.6.781
  13. Improved analytical formulation for Steel-Concrete (SC) composite walls under out-of-plane loads vol.38, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.38.4.463
  14. Ionic liquid coated magnetic core/shell CoFe2O4@SiO2 nanoparticles for the separation/analysis of trace gold in water sample vol.10, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2021.10.3.295
  15. Experimental evaluation of new channel shear connector shapes vol.21, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00478-x
  16. Application of multi-hybrid metaheuristic algorithm on prediction of split-tensile strength of shear connectors vol.28, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2021.28.2.167
  17. Analyzing shear strength of steel-concrete composite beam with angle connectors at elevated temperature using finite element method vol.40, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.40.6.853
  18. Evaluation and monitoring of impact resistance of fiber reinforced concrete by adaptive neuro fuzzy algorithm vol.34, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.072