The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison Study on Mathematics Assessment Frameworks -Focusing on NAEP 2015, TIMSS 2015 and PISA 2015-

수학 학습 평가틀 비교 분석 -NAEP 2015, TIMSS 2015, PISA 2015를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2015.06.04
  • Accepted : 2015.08.21
  • Published : 2015.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide insights on making Korean mathematics framework by analytical comparison of three major assessments such as the NAEP 2015, the TIMSS 2015 and the PISA 2015. This study focused on the key differences and common themes of mathematics frameworks among three major assessments. In order to achieve this purpose, mathematical frameworks of the NAEP 2015, the TIMSS 2015, and the PISA 2015 were analyzed and compared. The criteria of the comparison were content domain and cognitive domain. The comparing criteria of content domain were based on NCTM content standards and cognitive domain were used the three understanding levels of Jan de Lange's pyramid model. Based on these comparisons, researchers discussed that Korea mathematical framework was needed to have a set of content categories that reflect the range of underlying mathematical phenomena and a set of cognitive levels which contain the range of underlying fundamental mathematical capabilities including consideration of contexts.

Keywords

References

  1. 강완, 서동엽, 나귀수 (2013). 2009 교육과정에 따른 초등수학 교과서 단원 평가의 개발 방향과 과제. 한국초등수학교육학회지 17(2), 301-319. Kang, W., Seo, D. Y., & Na, G. S. (2013). Exploring the directions and the issues in developing the lesson assessment of the elementary math textbook in 2009 revised curriculum, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea 17(2), 301-319.
  2. 고상숙, 주홍연, 한혜숙 (2014). 그래핑 계산기를 활용한 수학적 과정의 평가도구 개발에 관한 연구-중학교 수학을 중심으로-. 수학교육, 53(2), 163-184. Koh, S. S., Joo, H. H., & Han, H. S. (2014). A study on the development of assessment tools using graphing calculators for the assessment of mathematical process-focused on middle school mathematics-. The Mathematics Education, 53(2), 163-184.
  3. 교육과학기술부 (2011). 2009 개정 수학과 교육과정. 서울: 교육과학기술부. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). Mathematics curriculum. MEST announcement 2011-361 [Separate version 8]. Seoul: MEST.
  4. 교육부 (2014). 초등학교 교사용 지도서 수학 3-1. 서울: (주)천재교육. Ministry of Education (2014). Korean national elementary mathematics 3-1 teacher's guide. Seoul: Chunjae Education.
  5. 김수진, 동효관, 박지현, 김지영, 진의남, 전경희, 서지희, 김민정 (2013). 수학 과학 성취도 추이변화 국제비교 연구: TIMSS 2015 평가 기반 구축 (연구보고 RRE 2013-7-3). 서울: 한국교육과정평가원. Kim, S. J., Dong, H. K., Park, J. H., Kim, J. Y., Jin, E. N., Chon, K. H., Seo, J. Y., & Kim, M. J. (2013). Preparation of TIMSS 2015 field trial: technical report (Rep. RRE 2013-7-3). Seoul: KICE.
  6. 박지현, 김수진 (2014). TIMSS 2015 수학 평가틀의 특징 및 변화 방향, 한국수학교육학회 2014 춘계 학술대회 프로시딩(pp. 67-70). 서울: 한국수학교육학회. Park, J. H. & Kim. S. J. (2014). The characteristic of mathematics assessment frameworks of TIMSS 2015, The Korean Soc. Math. Ed.: Proceeding of the KSME 2014 spring conference on math. edu. April 4-5, 2014 (pp 67-70). Seoul: KSME.
  7. 송미영, 최혁준, 임해미, 박혜경, 손수경 (2013). OECD 국제 학업성취도 평가 연구: PISA 2015 예비검사 시행 기반 구축 (연구보고 RRE 2013-6-2). 서울: 한국교육과정평가원. Song, M. Y., Choi, H. J., Rim, H. M., Park, H. Y., & Son, S. K. (2013). OECD programme for international student assessment: establishing PISA 2015 field trial (Rep. RRE 2013-6-2). Seoul: KICE.
  8. 신준식, 고정화, 박문환, 박성선, 서동엽. (2011). 수학적 사고력 측정을 위한 수학 평가 도구의 개발. 한국초등수학교육학회지 15(3), 619-640. Shin, J. S., Ko, J. H., Park, M. H., Park, S. S., & Seo, D. Y. (2011). Development of the items for the assessment of mathematical thinking, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea 15(3), 619-640.
  9. 이종희, 김선희, 김수진, 김기연, 김부미, 윤수철, 김윤민 (2011). 수학 학습에 대한 정의적 성취 검사 도구 개발 및 검증. 수학교육 50(2), 247-261. Lee, C. H., Kim, S. H., Kim, S. J., Kim, K. Y., Kim, B. M., Yun, S. C., & Kim, Y. M. (2011). Development and verification of an affective inventory in mathematical learning. The Mathematics Education, 50(2), 247-261.
  10. 정영옥 (2004). RME의 수학 학습 평가틀에 대한 고찰-Jan de Lange의 수학 학습 평가틀을 중심으로. 수학교육학연구, 14(4), 347-366. Chong, Y. O. (2004). Reflections on framework for mathematics assessment in realistic mathematics education, The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 14(4), 347-366.
  11. 조영미 (2004). 미국의 NAEP 수학 평가틀에 관한 고찰. 교육과정평가연구 7(1), 107-130. Cho, Y. M. (2004). A study on mathematics frameworks of national assessment educational progress in the united states, The Journal of Curriculum & Evaluation 7(1), 107-130.
  12. 조윤동, 이광상 (2014). 2010-2012년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가에서 나타난 초등학교 성취수준별 학업 특성. 수학교육 53(2), 219-237. Jo, Y. D. & Lee K. S. (2014). Elementary school learning characteristic of each proficiency level that appears in 2010-2012 Nation Assessment of Educational Achievement. The Mathematics Education, 53(2), 219-237.
  13. 황우형, 구자형 (2006). 수학과 평가틀 비교 연구. 한국학교수학회논문집 4(2), 497-520. Whang, W. H. & Ku, J. H. (2006). A comparison study on mathematics assessment frameworks, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society 9(4), 497-520.
  14. 황혜정, 최승현 (1999). 수학과 평가틀에 관한 고찰. 수학교육학연구, 9(2), 459-471. Hwang, H. J. & Choi, S. H. (1999). A study on the assessment framework in mathematics education, The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 9(2), 459-471.
  15. De Lange, J. (1999). Framework for classroom assessment in mathematics. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute & National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
  16. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht, Reidel: D Reidel Publishing Company.
  17. Johnson, E. G. (1998). Linking the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): A Technical Report. Research and Development Report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  18. Kim, Y. O., Wakhungu, H., & Ku, I S. (2009). Comparison of NAEP, PISA, and TIMSS-R, East Asian Mathematical Journal, 25(3), 279-297.
  19. National Assessment Governing Board. (2014). Mathematics framework for the 2015 national assessment of educational progress. Retrieved January 15, 2015 from https://nces.ed.gov/
  20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  22. Neidorf, T. S., Binkley, M., Gattis, K., & Nohara, D. (2006). Comparing mathematics content in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), and Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003 Assessments (NCES 2006-029). U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  23. Nohara, D. (2001). A comparison of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the Third International Mathematics and Science Study-Repeat (TIMSS-R), and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  24. OECD. (2015). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Retrieved January 15, 2015 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/
  25. OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 draft mathematics framework. Retrieved January 15, 2015 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/
  26. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center. (2015a). TIMSS & PIRILS. Retrieved January 15, 2015 from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/
  27. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center. (2015b). TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks. Retrieved January 15, 2015 from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/

Cited by

  1. 고등학생의 수학사회화 경험 수준에 따른 수학점수, 수학불안과 수학흥미도 간의 관계 연구 vol.33, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2019.33.1.21