DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of Flood Risk Considering Flood Control Ability and Urban Environment Risk

수방능력 및 재해위험을 고려한 침수위험도 결정

  • Lee, Eui Hoon (Department of Civil & Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Hyeon Seok (Department of Civil & Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Joong Hoon (Department of Civil & Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University)
  • 이의훈 (고려대학교 공과대학 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 최현석 (고려대학교 공과대학 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 김중훈 (고려대학교 공과대학 건축사회환경공학과)
  • Received : 2014.09.15
  • Accepted : 2015.07.29
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Recently, climate change has affected short time concentrated local rainfall and unexpected heavy rain which is increasingly causing life and property damage. In this research, arithmetic average analysis, weighted average analysis, and principal component analysis are used for predicting flood risk. This research is foundation for application of predicting flood risk based on annals of disaster and status of urban planning. Results obtained by arithmetic average analysis, weighted average analysis, and principal component analysis using many factors affect on flood are compared. In case of arithmetic average analysis, each factor has same weights though it is simple method. In case of weighted average analysis, correlation factors are complex by many variables and multicollinearty problem happen though it has different weights. For solving these problems, principal component analysis (PCA) is used because each factor has different weights and the number of variables is smaller than other methods by combining variables. Finally, flood risk assessment considering flood control ability and urban environment risk in former research is predicted.

최근 기후변화는 짧은 시간의 지역적인 집중호우와 예상치 못한 폭우에 영향을 미치고 이는 생명과 재산의 손실에 영향을 준다. 본 연구에서는 침수위험도를 결정하기 위한 방법으로 산술평균방법, 가중평균방법, 주성분 분석방법을 이용하여 침수위험도에 따른 순위를 결정하였다. 재해연보 및 도시계획 현황에서 선택한 인자들에 대한 표준화를 통해 단위를 통일시켰으며 표준화를 통한 산술평균방법, 상관관계분석을 통한 가중평균방법, 상관도가 높은 인자들을 묶어 분석한 주성분 분석방법을 통해 침수위험도를 결정하고 그 순위를 나타내었다. 본 연구에서 사용된 산술평균방법의 경우 간단하기는 하지만 각각의 인자들이 동일한 가중치를 가지는 문제점이 있고 가중평균 방법의 경우 각각의 인자들이 다른 가중치를 갖기는 하지만 많은 변수들 때문에 변수들 간의 상관관계가 복잡해지는 문제점이 있다. 이러한 문제점을 극복하기 위해 주성분 분석방법을 사용하였으며 각 지역의 수방능력 및 재해위험을 고려한 침수위험도를 결정하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmad, S.S., and Simonovic, S.P. (2011). "A three imensional fuzzy methodology for flood risk analysis." Journal of Flood Risk Management, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01085.x
  2. Choi, S.W., Jun, H.D., and Park, M.J. (2007). Development of an Inundation Risk Evaluation Method Based on a Multi Criteria Decision Making, Korean Society of Civil Engineers Conference.
  3. Dong, X., Zeng, S., Chen, J., and Zhao, D. (2008). "An integrated assessment method of urban drainage system: A case study in Shenzen City, China." Frontiers of Environmental Sicence & Engineering in China, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 150-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-008-0014-z
  4. Ellis, J.B., and Marsalek, J. (1996). Overview of urban drainage: environmental impacts and concerns, means of mitigation and implementation policies. International Association for Hydraulic Research, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689609498446
  5. Feng, L., and Luo, G. (2008). "Flood Risk Analysis Based on Information Diffusion Theory." Human and Ecological Risk Assessment : An International Journal, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 1330-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030802494691
  6. Ghanbarpour, M.R., Saravi, M.M., and Salimi, S. (2014). "Floodplain Inundation Analysis Combined with Contingent Valuation: Implications for Sustainable Flood Risk Management." Water Resources Management, Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 2491-2505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0622-2
  7. Hung, H.V., Shaw, R., and Kobayashi, M. (2010). "Flood risk management for the riverside urban areas of Hanoi:The need for synergy in urban development and risk management policies." Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 19, Iss: 1, pp. 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011022171
  8. Joo S.J., Yang J.C., Yoon H.C., Kim C.H., Choi Y.H., and Jung I.S. (2000). National Territorial Development Strategies for Disaster Prevention, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Sejong.
  9. Kim, H.J. (2003). A Study en the Regional Vulnerability Assessment and its Application for the Disaster Management, National Disaster Management Institute, Seoul.
  10. Kim, W.G. (2006). Development of Regional Risk Evaluation Method on Man-made Disaster, National Disaster Management Institute, Seoul.
  11. Kim, Y.H. (2012). GIS-based potential flood area analysis on water-level change in the river, master's thesis, Kyungpook national university, Korea.
  12. Lee, J.H., Ryu, S.H., and Song, Y.H. (2012). An Optimal Sewer Network Design to Reduce the Damage for Urban Inundation Risk Area, Korea Water Resources Association Conference.
  13. Lee, W.W., Jun, H.D., Lee, J.H., and Kim, J.H. (2007). A Development of Inundation Risk Index using Fuzzy C-Means algorithm, Korean Society of Civil Engineers Conference.
  14. Li, Q., Zhou, J., Liu, D., and Jiang, X. (2012). "Research on flood risk analysis and evaluation method based on variable fuzzy sets and information diffusion." Safety Science, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 1275-1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.01.007
  15. National Disaster Management Institute (2000). A Study on the Improvement of Disaster Mitigation Institution in Urban and Regional Planning, Ministry of Security and Public Administration, Seoul.
  16. National Disaster Management Institute (2004). A Study on the Disaster Prevention and Safety Plan in the Urban Planning, National Disaster Management Institute, Seoul.
  17. National Disaster Management Institute (2005). A Study on the Disaster Prevention Planning System of Advanced countries for the advancement of Disaster Management Planning, National Disaster Management Institute, Seoul.
  18. Nandalal, H.K., and Ratnayake, U.R. (2011). "Flood risk analysis using fuzzy models." Journal of Flood Risk Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.128-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01097.x
  19. Park, B.C. (2007). Development of Residents' Recognition Level Evaluation Items to Rate The Level of Safety on The Occurrence of Disaster, National Disaster Management Institute, Seoul.
  20. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2009). Seoul river maintenance master plan, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul.
  21. Son, M.S., Park, J.Y., and Kim, H.S. (2013). "Urban Environment Risk-Evaluating Flooding Risk Indices of Seoul." Journal of Seoul Institute, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 127-140.
  22. Zhou, Q., Panduro, T.E., Thorsen, B.J., and Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K. (2013). "Adaption to Extreme Rainfall with Open Urban Drainage System: An Integrated Hydrological Cost-Benefit Analysis." Environmental Management, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 586-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-0010-8