International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Virtual maneuvering test in CFD media in presence of free surface

  • Hajivand, Ahmad (Maritime Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology) ;
  • Mousavizadegan, S. Hossein (Maritime Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology)
  • Received : 2014.08.23
  • Accepted : 2015.03.24
  • Published : 2015.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Maneuvering oblique towing test is simulated in a Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) environment to obtain the linear and nonlinear velocity dependent damping coefficients for a DTMB 5512 model ship. The simulations are carried out in freely accessible OpenFOAM library with three different solvers, rasInterFoam, LTSInterFoam and interDyMFoam, and two turbulence models, $k-{\varepsilon}$ and SST $k-{\omega}$ in presence of free surface. Turning and zig-zag maneuvers are simulated for the DTMB 5512 model ship using the calculated damping coefficients with CFD. The comparison of simulated results with the available experimental shows a very good agreement among them.

Keywords

References

  1. Abkowitz, M.A., 1969. Stability and motion control of ocean vehicles. Massachusetts and London: MIT, Cambridge.
  2. Beck, R. and Reed, A. Modern seakeeping computations for ships. Twenty Third Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Val de Reuil, France, 17-22 September 2000, pp.1-45.
  3. Dantas, J.L.D. and de Barros, E.A., 2013. Numerical analysis of control surface effects on AUV manoeuvrability. Journal of Applied Ocean Research, 42, pp.168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2013.06.002
  4. Ferziger, H. J. and Peric, M., 2002. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. 3rd edition. Berlin: Springer.
  5. Gentaz, L., Guillerm, P.E., Alessandrini, B. and Delhommeau, G. Three-dimensional free-surface viscous flow around a ship in forced motion. Proceedings of Seventh International Conference Numerical Ship Hydrodynamic, Nantes, France, 19-22 July 1999, pp.1-12.
  6. Hirt, C.W. and Nichols, B.D., 1981. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 39, pp.201-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
  7. IMO (International Maritime Organization), 2002a. Resolution standards for ship maneuverability, MSC.137 (76). London: IMO.
  8. IMO (International Maritime Organization), 2002b. Explanatory notes to the standards for ship maneuverability, MSC/Circ 1053. London: IMO.
  9. Jasak, H., 2009. OpenFOAM: Open source CFD in research and industry. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 1(2), pp.89-94. https://doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2009.1.2.089
  10. Lewis, E.V., 1988. Principles of naval architecture. Jersey City, NJ: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
  11. Menter, F.R., Kuntz, M. and Langtry, R. 2003. Ten Years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer 4. edited by K. Hanjalic, Y. Nagano, and M. Tummers. New York: Begell House, Inc.
  12. Nazir, Z., Su, Y. and Wang, Z., 2010. A CFD based investigation of the unsteady hydrodynamic coefficients of 3-D fins in viscous flow. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 9(3), pp.250-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-010-1003-8
  13. Nomoto, K., 1960. Analysis of Kempf's standard maneuver test and proposed steering quality indices. Proceedings of 1st Symposium on Ship Maneuverability, Department Of The Navy, Maryland, United State of America, 24 -25 May 1960, pp.275-304.
  14. Olivieri, A., Pistani, F., Avanzini, A., Stern, F. and Penna, R., 2001. Towing tank experiments of resistance, sinkage and trim, boundary layer, wake, and free surface flow around a naval combatant insean 2340 model, IIHR Technical Report No. 42. Iowa: Iowa institute of hydrolic research, The University of Iowa.
  15. Park, S., Park, S.W., Rhee, S.H., Lee, S.B., Choi, J. and Kang, S.H., 2013. Investigation on the wall function implementation for the prediction of ship resistance. International Journal of Naval architecture and Ocean Engineering, 5(1), pp.33-46. https://doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2013.5.1.033
  16. Ray, A., Singh, S.N. and Seshadri, V., 2009. Evaluation of linear and nonlinear hydrodynamic coefficients of underwater vehicles using CFD. Proceedings of the ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Honolulu, Hawaii, 31 May - 5 June 2009, pp.257-265.
  17. Roache, P.J., 1997. Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 29, pp.123-160. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.123
  18. Rusche, H., 2002. Computational fluid synamics of sispersed two-phase flows at high phase fractions. Ph.D thesis. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, London.
  19. Sarkar, T., Sayer, P.G. and Fraser, S.M., 1997. A study of autonomous underwater vehicle hull forms using computational fluid dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 25(11), pp.1301-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19971215)25:11<1301::AID-FLD612>3.0.CO;2-G
  20. Schmode, D., Bertram, V. and Tenzer, M., 2009. Simulating ship motions and loads using OpenFOAM. 12th Numerical Towing Tank Symposium, Cortona, Italy, 4-6 October 2009, pp. 148-152.
  21. Seo, J.H., Seol, D.M., Lee, J.H. and Rhee, S.H., 2010. Flexible CFD meshing strategy for prediction of ship resistance and propulsion performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2(3), pp.139-145. https://doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2010.2.3.139
  22. Simonsen, C.D., Otzen, J.F., Klimt, C., Larsen, N.L. and Stern, F., 2012. Maneuvering predictions in the early design phase using CFD generated PMM data. 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden, 26-31 August 2012.
  23. Tyagi, A. and Sen, D., 2006. Calculation of transverse hydrodynamic coefficients using computational fluid dynamic approach. Journal of Ocean Engineering, 33, pp.798-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.06.004
  24. Ubbink, O., 1997. Numerical prediction of two fluid systems with sharp interfaces. Ph.D thesis. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science.
  25. Wilson, R., Paterson, E. and Stern, F. Unsteady RANS CFD method for naval combatants in waves. Proceedings of 22nd Symposium Naval Hydrodynamic, Washington, D C., 9-14 August 1998, pp.532-549.
  26. Yoon, H., 2009. Phase-averaged stereo-PIV flow field and Force/moment/motion measurements for surface combatant in PMM maneuvers. Ph.D thesis. The University of Iowa.
  27. Yoshimura, Y., 2005. Mathematical model for maneuvering ship motion (MMG Model). Workshop on Mathematical Models for Operations involving Ship-Ship Interaction, Tokyo, August 2005, pp.1-6.
  28. Zhang, H., Xu, Y. and Cai, H., 2010. Using CFD software to calculate hydrodynamic coefficients. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 9, pp.149-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-010-9009-9

Cited by

  1. Virtual simulation of maneuvering captive tests for a surface vessel vol.7, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0060
  2. CFD-based analyses for a slow speed manoeuvrability model vol.24, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0593-8
  3. Numerical Simulation of Viscous Flows Around a Surface Combatant Model at Different Drift Angles Using Overset Grids vol.18, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219876220410157
  4. Investigating the effect of rudder profile on 6DOF ship course-changing performance vol.117, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102944