Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on Trends and Tasks of Open Data Policy in the Digital Era

디지털 시대 오픈 데이터 정책의 현황과 과제

  • 신은자 (세종대학교 신문방송학과)
  • Received : 2015.07.23
  • Accepted : 2015.09.10
  • Published : 2015.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There were not many ways to share research data in the past, but modern information technology has allowed us to share these data. As data sharing has its side effects, researchers' attitude and practice to sharing data vary by individual discipline. This study found that foreign learned societies, NGOs, universities and research funders support data sharing in a utilitarian perspective, while major publishers demand it so that other researchers can verify the data in peer review. It is important that open data policy should be settled down in near future for evoking further studies and encouraging progress in science. In order to establish data sharing successfully in Korea, efforts could be made by researchers, universities, academic libraries, and governments as well as the stakeholder. This study also proposed specific ways to perform it.

과거에는 오픈 데이터에 공감한다 하더라도 이를 실천할 방법이 마땅하지 않았으나 요즈음은 디지털 형태의 연구데이터를 IT를 통해 공유하는 것이 어렵지 않은 상황이 되었다. 그러나 많은 연구자가 오픈 데이터를 시행하였을 때의 부작용과 추가 작업에 대한 부담을 느끼고 있고 이외 해결하여야 할 문제도 다소 있어, 오픈 데이터는 현재 기대만큼 활발히 수행되고 있지는 않다. 지구과학, 기상학 등 일부 학문 분야에서 활발하게 추진되고 있을 뿐 나머지 학문 분야에서는 오픈 데이터에 대하여 큰 관심을 보이지 않는 듯하다. 연구결과 해외의 학회, 비영리단체, 대학, 연구지원기관에서는 오픈 데이터를 공공의 이익 추구 차원에서, 주요 출판사에서는 오픈 데이터를 논문을 엄격하게 심사하기 위한 보완책 차원에서 추진하고 있었다. 오픈 데이터는 후속 연구를 이끌고 학문을 발전시키는 발판 역할을 한다는 점에서 중요하고 앞으로 나아가야 할 방향이라는 것은 분명해 보인다. 따라서, 국내에서도 해외의 사례를 충분히 고찰하고 정책에 반영함은 물론이려니와, 연구자, 대학, 도서관 모두 오픈 데이터의 필요성과 향후 전개될 상황에 관하여 관심을 갖고 보다 적극적으로 협력하여야 할 것이며, 이 연구는 이에 관한 구체적인 내용을 기술하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강희종 (2012). 21세기 핵심자원, 국가과학데이터 활용을 위한 정책 과제. STEPI Insight, (91), 1-21.(Kang, Hee-Jong (2012). Key resources in 21st century, policy tasks on use of national scientific data. STEPI Insight, (91), 1-21.)
  2. 김문정, 김성희 (2015). 과학기술분야 연구자의 연구데이터 공유의 영향요인에 대한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 49(2), 313-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.313 (Kim, Moonjeong, & Kim, Seonghee (2015). A study on the factors affecting sharing of research data of science and technology researchers. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(2), 313-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.313)
  3. 김선태, 한선화, 이태영, 김용 (2010). 과학데이터 보존 및 활용모델에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(4), 81-93. (Kim, Sun-Tae, hahn, Sun-Hwa, Lee, Tae-young, & Kim, Yong (2010). A study on a model for using and preserving scientific data. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 21(4), 81-93.)
  4. 김지현 (2012). 대학 내 연구자들의 연구데이터 관리에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 43(3), 433-455.(Kim, Jihyun (2012). A study on university researchers' data management practices. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3), 433-455.)
  5. 김지현 (2013). 국외 정부연구비지원기관의 연구데이터 관리정책 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(3), 251-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.251 (Kim, Jihyun (2013). An analysis of data management policies of governmental funding agencies in the U.S., the U.K., Canada and Australia. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(3), 251-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.251)
  6. 남궁용권, 남궁지영 (2008). 논문 작성의 이론과 실제. 파주: 양서원. (Namkung, Yong-Kwon, & Namkung, Ji-young (2008). Theory and practice on writing papers. Paju: Yangseowon.)
  7. 박성욱, 한선화 (2011). 국가 과학데이터센터 구축의 경제적 파급효과 분석. 정보관리연구, 42(3), 55-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.3.055 (Park, Sung-Uk, & Hahn, Sun-Hwa (2011). An economic ripple effect analysis of national scientific data center construction. Journal of Information Management, 42(3), 55-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.3.055)
  8. 성진석 (2011). 연구관련 산출물 관리체계 구축. KSLA Bulletin, (3), 11-14.(Sung, Jin-Seok (2011). Development of management system for archiving research data. KSLA Bulletin, (3), 11-14.)
  9. 신영란 (2011). 사회과학 데이터 아카이브 서비스. KSLA Bulletin, (3), 7-10.(Shin, Young-Ran (2011). Data archive service in social science. KSLA Bulletin, (3), 7-10.)
  10. 신영란, 정연경 (2012). 국내 인문사회 연구데이터 아카이브의 개선방안에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(3), 93-115.(Shin, Young-Ran, & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2012). A study on the improvement plans of the humanities and social sciences research data archives in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 12(3), 93-115.)
  11. 윤종민, 김규빈 (2013). 과학데이터에 관한 입법례와 관리정책 그리고 대응방안: 호주, 미국, 중국을 중심으로. 기술혁신학회지, 16(1), 63-100.(Yoon, Chong-min, & Kim, Kyubin (2013). Legislation cases, management policies and countermeasures on scientific data: Focusing Australia, the United States and China. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 16(1), 63-100.)
  12. 이상환, 심원식 (2009). 과학데이터의 공유와 활용. KISTI 지식리포트, (5), 1-36. (Lee, Sang-Hwan, & Shim, Wonsik (2009). Sharing and use of scientific data. KISTI Knowledge Report, (5), 1-36.)
  13. 한국과학기술정보연구원 (2012). 국가 과학데이터 공유.활용체제 구축. 서울: 교육과학기술부. (Korean Institute of Science and Technology Information (2012). A development on the scientific data sharing and utilizing system. Seoul: Ministry of Education.)
  14. Brown, S., Humphrey, C., Leahey, A., Webster, P., Austin, C., Born, A., & Mills, S. (2015). Guidelines for the deposit and preservation of research data in Canada. Retrieved from http://www.rdc-drc.ca/wp-content/uploads/Guidelines-for-Deposit-of-Research-Data-in-Canada-2015.pdf
  15. Callaghan, S. (2014). Open data in the earth and climate sciences. In: Moore, S. A.(ed.) Issues in open research data. (pp. 89-106). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ban.f
  16. Caulfield, T., Harmon, S. H. E., & Joly, Y. (2012). Open science versus commercialization: A modern research conflict. Genome Medicine, 4(17). DOI: 10.1186/gm316
  17. Dimitrova, V. (2014). Open research data in economics. In: Moore, S.A.(ed.) Issues in open research data. (pp. 141-150). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ban.i
  18. Kansa, E. C., & Kansa, W. S. (2013). We all know that a 14 is a sheep: Data publication and professionalism in archaeological communication. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies, 1(1), 88-97. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/journal_of_eastern_mediterranean_archaeology_and_heritage_studies/v001/1.1.kansa01.html https://doi.org/10.5325/jeasmedarcherstu.1.1.0088
  19. Karunakara, U. (2014). Data sharing in a humanitarian organization: The experience of Medecins Sans Frontieres. In: Moore, S.A. (ed.) Issues in open research data. (pp. 59-76). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ban.f
  20. Kim, Jeonghyun (2013). Data sharing and its implications for academic libraries. New Library World, 114(11/12), 494-506. DOI: 10.1108/NLW-06-2013-0051
  21. KOSSDA (2015). Retrieved from http://www.kossda.or.kr/w01_03a.asp
  22. Kratz, J., & Strasser, C. (2014). Data publication consensus and controversies. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3979.2
  23. Mounce, R. (2014). Open data and palaeontology. In: Moore, S.A. (ed.) Issues in open research data. (pp. 151-164). London: Ubiquity Press. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ban.j
  24. Murphy, F. (2014). Data and scholarly publishing: The transforming landscape. Learned Publishing, 27(special issue), S3-S7. DOI: 10.1087/20140502
  25. Nature Publishing Group (2013). Availability of data and materials. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html
  26. Nature Publishing Group (2015). Getting published in Nature: The editorial process. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/get_published/index.html#a1
  27. Norman, H. (2014). Mandating data archiving: Experiences from the frontline. Learned Publishing, 27(special issue): S35-S38. DOI: 10.1087/20140507
  28. PLOS (2013). Data access for the open access literature: PLOS's data policy. Retrieved from https://www.plos.org/data-access-for-the-open-access-literature-ploss-data-policy/
  29. Pollard, T., & Celi, L. A. (2014). Open data in health care. In: Moore, S.A. (ed.) Issues in open research data. (pp. 129-140). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ban.h
  30. Research Councils UK (2013). RCUK policy on open access and supporting guidance. Retrieved from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf
  31. Royal Society (2012). Science as an open enterprise. The Royal Society Science Policy Centre Report 02/12. Retrieved from http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-SAOE.pdf
  32. van den Bos, W, Mirjam, J., & Wulff, D. (2014). Open minded psychology. In: Moore, S (ed.) Issues in open research data. (pp. 107-127). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ban.g
  33. Vines, T. H. et al. (2013). Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data, The FASEB Journal, 27, 1304-1308. DOI: 10.1096/fj.12-218164
  34. The White House OSTP (2013). Expanding public access to the results of federally funded research. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/02/22/expanding-public-access-results-federally-funded-research