Elementary Students' Formation of Relational Thinking about Equation - Centered for Web-Based Balance

시선 추적기를 통해 본, 4학년 학생들의 방정식에 대한 관계적 사고 형성 -웹기반 저울을 중심으로

  • Received : 2015.07.29
  • Accepted : 2015.09.18
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate how students' relational thinking about equations could be formed by exploring web-based balance. The researchers developed 3 groups of 4 typed 12 equation problems of (a+b+c = d+ _ ) to test 24 4th graders. Pretest and post-test were conducted using Eye-tracker for investigating their eye movements. The researchers interviewed students who were not having distinct strategies to look into their cognitive process. As a result, we can conclude web-based balance helped students to get the concept of the equal sign and to form the relational thinking by the process of comparing both sides, right and left on the basis of fulcrum on balance.

본 연구에서는 시선추적기(Eye-Tracker)를 활용하여 웹기반 저울 교수학습 프로그램을 이용한 대수적 실험이 학생들의 방정식에 대한 관계적 사고를 형성 시키는지를 학생들의 시선 움직임으로 확인하고자 하였다. 연구문제를 해결하기 위해 전주의 J초등학교 4학년 학생 24명을 대상으로 방정식(a+b+c=d+_) 문제를 3블록, 4가지 형식(12문항)으로 제시하여 시선추적기를 통해 사전사후검사를 실시하고 전략이 뚜렷하지 않은 경우는 면담을 실시하여 인지 과정을 살펴보았다. 수업은 웹기반 수저울 중심으로 등호에 대한 개념 이해와 관계적 사고가 형성되도록 짜여졌다. 그 결과 웹기반 수저울은 받침점을 기준으로 좌우를 비교하도록 하는 과제 해결과정에서 등호에 대한 개념 형성 뿐 아니라, 평형을 이루기 위해 좌우를 살피는 문제 해결과정을 통해 관계적 사고를 형성할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 변정호, 이일선, 권용주 (2011). 시선추적기를 활 용한 시선집중 및 배분 교수행동 패턴의 컨설팅사례연구. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(4), 173-199.
  2. 오지혜 (2011). 초등수학에서 등호 개념 지도를 위한 교사 지식에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사논문.
  3. Ashlock, Robert B.(2010). Error Patterns in Computation: Using Error Patterns To Help Each Student Learn. 10th Edition. Pearson Education. 남승인 외 6명 공역(2013). 예비교 사와 현직교사를 위한 초등수학 교수법 - 수학 오개념과 오류 바로잡기. 서울: 경문사.
  4. Behr, M., Erlwanger, S. & Nichols, E. (1980). How children view th equal sign. Mahematics Teaching, 92, 13-15.
  5. Broody, Arthur J., Coslick, Ronald T. (1998). Fostering children's mathematical Power. Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Inc. 권성룡 외 11인(2006). 수학의 힘을 길러주자. 왜? 어떻게?. 서울: 경문사.
  6. Chesney, D. L., McNeil, N. M., Brockmole, N. M., & Kelley, K. (2013). An eye for relations: eye-tracking indicates long-term negative effects of operational thinking on understanding of math equivalence. Memory & cognition, 41, 1079-1095. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0315-8
  7. Karatekin, C. (2007). Eye tracking studies of normative and atypical development. Development Review, 27, 283-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.06.006
  8. Kurz, T. L. (2013.) Using Technology to Balance Algebraic Explorations - Free, Web-based balance tools can help students visualize the concept of the equal sign as the pivot point of an equation. Teaching children mathematics, Vol. 19 No. 9, 554-562. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.19.9.0554
  9. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311062
  10. McNeil, N. M., Allibali, M. W. (2004) You'll see what you mean: Students encode equations based on their knowledge of arithmetic. Cognitive Science, 28, 451-466.
  11. McNeil, N. M., Chesney, D. L., Matthews, P. G. et al. (2012). It pay to be organized: Organizing arithmetic practice around equivalent values facilitates understanding of math equivalence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1109-1121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028997
  12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) Principle and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Author. 류희찬․ 조완영․이경화․나귀수․김남균․방정숙 공역(2007). 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준. 서울: 경문사.
  13. Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(88)90021-4
  14. Sherman, J., Bisanz, J.(2009) Equivalence in Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Contexts: Benefits of Solving Problems With Manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, volume 101, Number 1, 2009, 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013156
  15. Suth, J., & Moyer-Packenham, P. S. (2007). Developing students' representational fluency using virtual and physical algebra balances. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(2), 155.
  16. Tomas, L. E, & Lleras, A. (2007). Moving eyes and moving thought: On spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 663-668. doi:10.3758/BF03196818.
  17. Vlassis, J. (2002). The balance model: Hindrance or support for the solving of linear equations with one unknown. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 341-359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020229023965
  18. Warren, E., & Cooper, T. J. (2009). Developing mathematics understanding and abstraction: The case of equivalence in the elementary years. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217546