DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Supply Shortage Effects of Oil Refinery Industry in Korea

국내 정유산업의 공급지장효과 분석

  • Cho, Yong-Cheol (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Hwan (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Yoo, Seung-Hoon (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
  • 조용철 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과) ;
  • 이용환 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과) ;
  • 유승훈 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과)
  • Received : 2015.08.10
  • Accepted : 2015.09.16
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

As the petroleum products produced from the Oil refinery industry (ORI), a national key industry in Korea, are supplied to other industries as an intermediate goods, the supply shortage of ORI has a large impact on the national economy. This paper attempts to analyze the supply shortage effects which are defined as the negative impact of one won of supply failure in the ORI on the production of other industries. To this end, an inter-industry analysis using an input-output (I-O) table describing inter-industry flow of intermediate goods is applied. More concretely, the supply-driven model is employed over the period 1990-2012. In addition, the results are compared with those for shipbuilding, semiconductor, and steel industries. The results show that the supply shortage effects are computed to be 0.9205 won when using 2012 I-O table. More specifically, the supply shortage effects on chemical products and transportation industries are computed to be 0.2113 and 0.1140, which are relatively large, The supply shortage effect of ORI is smaller than that of steel industry (1.4131 won), but larger than that of shipbuilding industry (0.0586 won) and that of semiconductor industry (0.1111 won).

국가 기간산업 중 하나인 정유산업은 산출물인 석유제품을 각 산업부문에 중간재로 공급하고 있으므로 석유제품의 공급지장이 국민경제에 미치는 영향은 큰 편이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 정유산업 산출물 1원 어치의 공급지장이 타 산업에 미치는 부정적 생산차질 효과를 의미하는 공급지장효과를 분석하고자 한다. 이를 위해 산업간 중간재의 흐름을 하나의 표로 나타낸 산업연관표를 활용한 산업연관분석을 적용하고자 한다. 보다 구체적으로는 공급유도형 모형을 활용하되 1990년부터 2012년까지를 분석대상 기간으로 한다. 아울러 조선산업, 반도체산업, 철강산업과 같은 타 국가 기간산업과의 비교분석도 수행한다. 분석결과 2012년 기준 정유산업의 공급지장효과는 0.9025원으로 분석되었다. 세부적으로 살펴보면 화학제품산업 및 운송서비스산업에 미치는 공급지장효과가 각각 0.2113원 및 0.1140원으로 비교적 큰 편이었다. 정유산업의 공급지장효과는 철강산업에 대한 값(1.4131원)보다는 작지만 조선산업(0.0586원) 및 반도체산업(0.1111원)에 비해서는 큰 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, G. H., Interindustry, Yeonamsa, (2000)
  2. Korea Customs Service, Trade Statistics, www.custome.go.kr, (2015)
  3. Kim, H. Y., Song, T. H. & Yoo, S. H., Using the Demand-driven Model-based Inter-industry Analysis to Examine the Economic Effects of Petroleum Refinery Sector, Journal of Energy Engineering, 24(1), 104-113, (2015) https://doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2015.24.1.104
  4. Lim, S. Y., Park S. Y. & Yoo, S. H., The Economic Effects of the New and Renewable Energies Sector, Journal of Energy Engineering, 23(4), 31-40, (2014) https://doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2014.23.4.031
  5. Jeong, D. W., Yoo, S. H. & Hwang, S. S., An Analysis on the Economic Impacts of the Automobile Industry, The Journal of Business and Economics, 24(3), 187-209, (2008)
  6. Han, K. T., Kim, H. M. & Yoo, S. H., The Economic Effects of Integrated-Energy Business: An Input-Output Analysis, Journal of Energy Engineering, 21(1), 47-54, (2012) https://doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2012.21.1.047
  7. Heo, J. Y., Yoo, S. H., The Role of the manufactured Gas Supply Industry in the Korean National Economy: An Input-output Analysis, Journal of the Korean Society for Geosystem Engineering, 45(4), 360-369, (2008)
  8. Bank of Korea, The Commentary of Interindustry Analysis, Bank of Korea, Seoul, Korea, (1987)
  9. Bank of Korea, I-O Tables in 1990-2012 year, Bank of Korea, Seoul, Korea, (1992-2014)
  10. Bulmer-Thomas, V., Input-output Analysis on Developing Countries, New York: Wiley, (1982)
  11. Davis, H. C. & Salkin, E. L., Alternative Approaches to the Estimation of Economic Impacts Resulting from Supply Constraints, Annals of Regional Science, 18, 25-34, (1984) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287372
  12. Ghosh, A., Input-output Approach to an Allocative System, Economica, 25, 58-64, (1958) https://doi.org/10.2307/2550694
  13. Giarratani, F., Application of an Inter-Industry Supply Model to Energy Issues, Environment and Planning A, 8, 447-454, (1976) https://doi.org/10.1068/a080447
  14. Han. S. -Y., Yoo, S. -Y. & Kwak, S. -J., The Role of the Four Electric Power Sectors in the Korean National Economy: An Input-output Analysis, Energy Policy, 32, 1531-1543, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00125-3
  15. Heo J. -Y., Yoo S. -H. & Kwak S. -J., The Role of the Oil Industry in the Korean National Economy: An Input-output Analysis, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 5, 327-336, (2010) https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240802533880
  16. Hoover, E. M.(ed), An Introduction to Regional Economics, New York: Alfred A. Knopt, (1975)
  17. Lee, M. -K & Yoo, S. -H., The Role of the Capture fisheries and Aquaculture Sectors in the Korean National Economy: An Input-output Analysis, Marine Policy, 44, 448-456, (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.10.014
  18. Miller, R. E., Polensk, K. R., & Rose, A. Z. (ed), Frontiers of Input-output Analysis", Oxford: Oxford University Press, (1989)
  19. Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D., Input-output Analysis: Foundations and Extension. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, (1985)
  20. Oosterhaven, J., On the Plausibility of Supplydriven input-output Model, Journal of Regional Science, 29, 451-458, (1989) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1989.tb01390.x
  21. Oosterhaven, J., Leontief versus Ghoshian Price and Quantity Model, Southern Economic Journal, 62, 750-759, (1996) https://doi.org/10.2307/1060892
  22. Wu, R. H. & Chen, C. Y., On The Application of Input-output Analysis to Energy Issues, Energy Economics, 12, 71-76, (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(90)90010-D
  23. Yoo, S. -H. & Yoo, T.-H., The Role of the Nuclear Power Generation in the Korean National Economy: An Input-output Analysis, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 51, 86-92 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.12.001