Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on The Effect Quality Innovation of Convergence Management

융합경영이 품질혁신에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2015.08.13
  • Accepted : 2015.10.20
  • Published : 2015.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The biggest change in modern society because we will transition to a ubiquitous environment. Changes in the environment has become a crucial instrument that finally opens the era of convergence management through integrating the various fields in their own business. The desire of consumers to new innovative products appears to be a constant thing companies are constantly trying to respond to these changes, there may not be a problem for the convergence of sustainability management company in the end. In this study, based on the convergence of corporate management need to be a fusion component of corporate management to examine whether any impact on the quality of innovation. Results showed that the fusion management components that affect both internal factors and external factors, core factors quality improvement. Internal factors detailed in the convergence management leadership, risk management factors showed a positive external factors affecting appeared to affect positively the knowledge-sharing factors, infrastructure factors. Finally, core factor is technology factors, educational learning factors showed a positive impact. This results suggest that be a big impact factors of competitiveness of enterprises through convergence management in the future and will serve as the strategic basis for the convergence of future corporate management.

현대사회의 가장 큰 변화는 유비쿼터스 환경으로의 전환이라 하겠다. 이 환경의 변화는 결국 독자적인 경영에서 각 분야의 접목을 통한 융합경영의 시대를 열게 되는 결정적인 계기가 되었다. 소비자는 새로운 혁신제품에의 욕구가 끊임없이 나타나고 기업들은 이러한 변화에 대응하기 위한 부단한 노력을 하여야 하는 것은 결국 기업의 입장에서 융합경영은 지속경영을 위한 과제가 될 것이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기업의 융합경영 필요성에 근거를 두고 기업의 융합경영 구성요소가 품질혁신에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 지를 살펴보고자 한다. 연구 결과, 융합경영 구성요소인 내부요인, 외부요인, 핵심요인 모두 품질혁신에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 세부적으로는 융합경영 내부요인은 리더십, 리스크관리요인이 긍정적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 외부요인은 지식공유요인, 인프라요인이 긍정적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 핵심요인은 기술개발요인, 교육학습요인이 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 향후 융합경영을 통한 기업의 경쟁력 강화의 큰 영향요인이 될 것으로 사료되며 향후 기업의 융합경영을 위한 전략적 기초로 활용될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Park B. S., "A study on the marketing strategy for actual activation plan of inter-business information and technology exchange of small & medium industries", Ph.D. dissertation, HanYang University, 2000.
  2. Wernerfelt, B., "A Resource-Based View of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 171-180, 1994.
  3. Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G., "The core competence of the corporation", Harvard Business Review, Vol. May-June, pp. 79-91, 1990.
  4. Porter, M. E., Competitive strategy : techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, New York, NY : Free Press, 1980.
  5. Porter, M. E., Competitive advantage: creating sustaining superior performance, New York, NY : Free Press, 1985.
  6. Porter, M. E., The competitive advantage of nations, New York, NY : Free Press, 1990.
  7. Mahoney, J., Pandian, J. R., "The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 363-380, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130505
  8. Westley, F., Mintzberg, H., "Visionary Leadership and Strategic Management", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 17-32, 1989.
  9. Chandler, G. N., Hanks, S. H., Founder competence, The environment, And venture performance, Et & P, pp. 77-89, 1994.
  10. Lee D. H., "An Empirical Study on the Effect of the Degree of Different Business Exchange Activation on Business Performance in Small & Medium Venture Industry", Ph.D. dissertation, Gunguk University, 2009
  11. Song J. H., "An Empirical study on the Characteristics of SMEs and the Performances of Hetero-Sectoral Exchanges", Ph.D. dissertation, Hannam University, 2008.
  12. Shin S. C., D. J. Kim, Creative management, Seoul, ECO BOOK, 2007.
  13. Schumpeter, J. A., The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1934.
  14. Son T. W., G. P. Hong, M. H. Jung, Y. S. Kim, "Creativity management and corporate performance", Human resource management Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 273-301, 2002.
  15. Amabile, T. M., "How to Kill Creativity : In todays knowledge economy, creativity is more important than ever", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 76-88, 1998.
  16. Oldham, G. R. & Cummings, A., "Employee creativity : personal and contextual factors at work", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.39, pp. 607-634, 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
  17. Woodman, R. W; Sawyer, J. E. & Griffin, R. W., "Toward a theory of organizational creativity", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 293-321, 1993. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517
  18. Weisberg, R. W., Creativity : Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention and the art, New Jersey : Wiley & Sons, 2006.