DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes of River Morphology in the Mid-lower Part of Nakdong River Basin after the 4 Large River Project, South Korea

4대강 사업 후 낙동강 중·하류의 하중도와 제외지 지형변화

  • Im, Ran-Young (Department of Biological Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Ji Yoon (Department of Biological Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Jong-Yun (Department of Biological Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Do, Yuno (Department of Biological Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Joo, Gea-Jae (Department of Biological Sciences, Pusan National University)
  • 임란영 (부산대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 김지윤 (부산대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 최종윤 (부산대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 도윤호 (부산대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 주기재 (부산대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학과)
  • Received : 2015.03.30
  • Accepted : 2015.07.13
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

River channel dredging and riparian development have been influenced morphology and quantity of natural river habitat. We compared distribution of riverside land and alluvial island in the Nakdong River with field survey and remote sensing analysis after the 4 Large River Project in South Korea. We digitized geomorphological elements, includes main channel, riverside land, and alluvial island by using georeferenced aerial photos taken in pre-dredging (2008) and post-dredging (2012) periods. Field survey was followed in 2012 for a ground truth of digitized boundaries and identification of newly constructed wetland types such as pond, channel, branch, and riverine type. We found that during the dredging period, riverside land and alluvial island were lost by 20.2% and 72.7%, respectively. Modification rate of riverside land was higher in the section of river kilometer 50~90, 140~180, and 210~270. Alluvial island had higher change rate in the section of river kilometer 50~70, 190~210, and 270~310. Average change rate for the riverside land and alluvial island was $-1.02{\pm}0.14km^2{\cdot}10km^{-1}$ and $-0.05{\pm}0.05km^2{\cdot}10km^{-1}$, respectively. Channel shaped wetlands (72.5%) constituted large portion of newly constructed wetlands.

Keywords

References

  1. Bartlett, D.S. and V. Klemas. 1980. Quantitative assessment of tidal wetlands using remote sensing. Environmental Management 4(4): 337-345 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01869426
  2. Brookes, A., K.J. Gregory and F.H. Dawson. 1983. An assessment of river channelization in England and Wales. Science of the Total Environment 27(2-3): 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(83)90149-3
  3. Bunn, S.E. and A.H. Arthington. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30(4): 492-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0
  4. Do, Y., J.Y. Kim, R.Y. Im, S.B. Kim, J.Y. Choi and G.J. Joo. 2012. Spatial distribution and social characteristics for wetlands in Gyeongsangnam-do Province. Korean Journal of Limnological Society 45(2): 252-260.
  5. Erwin, K.L. 2009. Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecology and Management 17: 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1
  6. Gurnell, A.M., W. Bertoldi and D. Corenblit. 2012. Changing river channels: The roles of hydrological processes, plants and pioneer fluvial landforms in humid temperate, mixed load, gravel bed rivers. Earth-Science Reviews 111(1-2): 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.11.005
  7. Hart, D.D., T.E. Johnson, K.L. Bushaw-Newton, R.J Horwitz, A.T. Bednarek, D.F. Charles and D.J. Velinsky. 2002. Dam removal: challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. BioScience 52(8): 669-681. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0669:DRCAOF]2.0.CO;2
  8. Hohensinner, S., H. Habersack, M. Jungwirth and G. Zauner. 2004. Reconstruction of the characteristics of a natural alluvial river-floodplain system and hydromorphological changes following human modifications: the Danube River (1812-1991). River Research and Applications 20(1): 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.719
  9. Johnston, C.A., J.P. Schubauer-Berigan and S.D. Bridgham. 1996. The potential role of riverine wetlands as buffer zones, p. 62-69. In: Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection (Haycock, N., T. Burt, K. Goulding and G. Pinay, eds.). Haycock Associated Limited, London.
  10. Kim, J.W., S.W. Ryu, J.K. Lee, J.W. Park, Y.K. Lee, J.H. Shim, Y.H. Kang, S.K. Kim, G.J. Joo, G.Y. Kim, Y.H. Do, C.W. Lee and J.D. Yoon. 2002. Stream Ecology and Nakdong River. Keimyung University Press, Daegu.
  11. Koebel, J.W. 1995. An historical perspective on the Kissimmee River Restoration Project. Restoration Ecology 3(3): 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1995.tb00167.x
  12. Korea Environment Institute. 2013. A study environment monitoring of 4 Major Rivers Project. Korea Environment Institute, Sejong.
  13. Marlin, A., L. Olsen, D. Bruce, J. Ollerhead, K. Singh, J. Heckman, B. Walters, D. Meadus and A. Hanson. 2007. Examining community adaptive capacity to address climate change, sea level rise, and salt marsh restoration in maritime Canada. Mount Allison University, Canada.
  14. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport. 2010. 4 Rivers Guide. http://www.riverguide.go.kr. Accessed 6 March 2015.
  15. Nakamura, F., T. Sudo, S. Kameyama and M. Jitsu. 1997. Influences of channelization on discharge of suspended sediment and wetland vegetation in Kushiro Marsh, northern Japan. Geomorphology 18(3-4): 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(96)00031-1
  16. Nakamura, K., K. Tockner and K. Amano. 2006. River and wetland restoration: lessons from Japan. BioScience 56(5): 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0419:RAWRLF]2.0.CO;2
  17. National Institute of Biological Resources. 2013. The winter waterbird census of Korea. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon.
  18. National Wetlands Center. 2012. Wetland GIS DB. http://gis.wetland.go.kr/map/. Accessed 6 March 2015.
  19. Oh, C.Y., S.Y. Park. C.U. Choi and S.W. Jeon. 2010. Change detection at the Nakdong Estuary delta using satellite image and GIS. Journal of the Korea Society for Geospatial Information Science 3: 21-29.
  20. Oh, K.S., J.H. Yang and H. Cho. 2011. Geomorphological significance and role of the sand bars of major river valleys in the South Korea. Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association 18(2): 1-14.
  21. Palmer, M.A., E.S. Bernhardt, J.D. Allan, P.S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks and E. Sudduth. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42(2): 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x
  22. Palmer, M.A., H.L. Menninger and E. Bernhardt. 2010. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55(S1): 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x
  23. Park, S.K., J. Kim, K.J. Lee and M.H. Jo. 2013. Analysis of land use change within Four Major River areas using high-resolution air-photographs: the case of the Nakdong River basin. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 16(4): 171-188. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2013.16.4.171
  24. Rebelo, L.M., C.M. Finlayson and N. Nagabhatla. 2009. Remote sensing and GIS for wetland inventory, mapping and change analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 90(7): 2144-2153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.027
  25. Thorp, J.H. 1992. Linkage between islands and benthos in the Ohio River, with implications for riverine management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49(9): 1873-1882. https://doi.org/10.1139/f92-207
  26. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Methods for evaluating wetland condition. http://water.epa.gov/type/wetlands/methods_index.cfm. Accessed 6 March 2015.
  27. Ward, J.V. and J.A. Stanford. 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 10(2-4): 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450100211
  28. Ward, J.V., K. Tockner, U. Uehlinger and F. Malard. 2001. Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 17(4-5): 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.646