DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differences in Cold Rolling Workability and Mechanical Properties between Al-Mg-Si and Al-Mg-Zn System Alloys with Cold Rolling

냉간압연가공에 따른 Al-5.5Mg-2.9Si계와 Al-7Mg-0.9Zn계 합금의 압연가공성 및 기계적 특성 차이

  • Yang, Ji-Hun (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Lee, Seong-Hee (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Mokpo National University)
  • 양지훈 (국립목포대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 이성희 (국립목포대학교 신소재공학과)
  • Received : 2016.09.06
  • Accepted : 2016.10.17
  • Published : 2016.11.27

Abstract

The cold rolling workability and mechanical properties of two new alloys, designed and cast Al-5.5Mg-2.9Si and Al-7Mg-0.9Zn alloys, were investigated in detail. The two alloy sheets of 4 mm thickness, 30 mm width and 100 mm length were reduced to a thickness of 1 mm by multi-pass rolling at ambient temperature. The rolling workability was better for the Al-7Mg-0.9Zn alloy than for the Al-5.5Mg-2.9Si alloy; in case of the former alloy, edge cracks began to occur at 50% rolling reduction, and their number and length increased with rolling reduction; however, in the latter alloy, the sheets did not have any cracks even at higher rolling reduction. The mechanical properties of tensile strength and elongation were also better in the Al-7Mg-0.9Zn alloy than in Al-5.5Mg-2.9Si alloy. Work hardening ability after cold rolling was also higher in the Al-7Mg-0.9Zn alloy than in the Al-5.5Mg-2.9Si alloy. At the same time, the texture development was very similar for both alloys; typical rolling texture developed in both alloys. These differences in the two alloys can primarily be explained by the existence of precipitates of $Mg_2Si$. It is concluded that the Al-7Mg-0.9Zn alloy is better than the Al-5.5Mg-2.9Si alloy in terms of mechanical properties.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Guo, Y. Xu, Y. Han, J. Liu, G. Xue and H. Nagaumi, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 24, 2393 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63362-8
  2. X. Fan, Z. He, W. Zhou and S. Yuan, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 228, 179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.10.016
  3. L. Ding, Y. Weng, S. Wu, R. E. Sansers, Z. Jia and Q. Liu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 651, 991 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.11.050
  4. M. J. Ahn, H. S. You and S. H. Lee, Korean J. Met. Res., 26, 388 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3740/MRSK.2016.26.7.388
  5. H. W. Kim, S. B. Kang, H. Kang and K. W. Nam, J. Korean Inst. Met. Mater., 37, 1041 (1999).
  6. H. S. Ko, S. B. Kang, H. W. Kim and S. H. Hong, J. Korean Inst. Met. Mater., 37, 650 (1999).
  7. H. S. Ko, S. B. Kang and H. W. Kim, J. Korean Inst. Met. Mater., 37, 891 (1999).
  8. K. D. Woo, H. S. Na, H. J. Mun and I. O. Hwang, J. Korean Inst. Met. Mater., 38, 766 (2000).
  9. K. D. Woo, I. O. Hwang and J. S. Lee, J. Korean Inst. Met. Mater., 37, 1468 (1999).
  10. C. W. Park and H. Y. Kim, Trans. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng. A, 36, 1675 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2012.36.12.1675
  11. N. J. Park, J. H. Hwang and J. S. Roh, J. Korean Inst. Met. Mater., 47, 1 (2009)
  12. C. D. Yim, Y. M. Kim, S. H. Park and B. S. You, Korean J. Met. Mater., 50, 619 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3365/KJMM.2012.50.9.619
  13. D. H. Kim, J. M. Choi, D. H. Jo and I. M. Park, Korean J. Met. Mater., 52, 195 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3365/KJMM.2014.52.3.195
  14. E. Y. Kim, J. H. Cho, H. W. Kim and S. H. Choi, Korean J. Met. Mater., 51, 41 (2012).
  15. JIS Z 2201, Kaisetsu, (1980).