DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Preliminary Testing of the Nursing Competency Scale in Simulation for Nursing Students

시뮬레이션에서의 간호역량 측정도구 개발 및 평가

  • Kim, Eun Jung (Division of Nursing, College of Medicine.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Hallym University) ;
  • Nam, Kyoung A (Division of Nursing, College of Medicine.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Hallym University)
  • 김은정 (한림대학교 의과대학 간호학부.한림대학교 간호학연구소) ;
  • 남경아 (한림대학교 의과대학 간호학부.한림대학교 간호학연구소)
  • Received : 2016.05.11
  • Accepted : 2016.11.08
  • Published : 2016.11.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a Nursing Competency Scale in Simulation (NCSS) for nursing students. Methods: A preliminary version of the NCSS of 14 items was derived from the literature. A panel of seven experts reviewed the preliminary version for content validation and developed 15 items scale. A convenient sample of 195 nursing students completed the survey and two evaluators measured the performances of nine teams in a simulation scenario with NCSS. The data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, independent t-test and Cronbach's alpha. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used in order to estimate the degree of inter-rater reliability. Results: An exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that two factor structures of the NCSS explained 51.1% of the total variance. Two factors were named psychosocial skills and cognitive and psychomotor skills. The mean scores of NCSS between third and 4th grade were significantly different providing support for its known-group validity. Cronbach's alpha was .90 and ranged from .79 to .88. The overall ICC for inter-rater agreement was 0.89 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.98). Conclusion: This scale shows preliminary evidence for validity and reliability. It could be a useful instrument for measuring learning outcome in simulation for nursing students' clinical competency.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, K. A., & Lawrence, E. K. (2014). Research methods, statistics, and applications. London: Sage Publications.
  2. Andersen, P., Jensen, M. K., Lippert, A., & Ostergaard, D. (2010). Identifying non-technical skills and barriers for improvement of teamwork in cardiac arrest teams. Resuscitation. 81(6), 695-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.024
  3. Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
  4. Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: a call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Cato, M. L., Lasater, K., & Peeples, A. I. (2009). Nursing students' self-assessment of their simulation experiences. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 105-108.
  6. Cooper, S., Cant, R., & Porter, J. (2010). Rating emergency teamwork performance development of the team emergency assessment measure (TEAM). Resuscitation, 81(4), 446-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.027
  7. Cronenwett, L. G., Sherwood, J., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, P., & Mitchell, D., et al. (2007). Quality and safety education for nurses. Nursing Outlook, 55(3), 122-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006
  8. Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., Van Harrison, R. T. K. E., Thorpe, K. E., & Perrier, L. (2006). Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(9), 1094-1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1094
  9. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: theory and applications (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
  10. Enlow, M., Shanks, L., Guhde, J., & Perkins, M. (2010). Incorporating interprofessional communication skills (ISBARR) into an undergraduate nursing curriculum. Nurse Educator, 35(4), 176-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181e339ac
  11. Gantt, L. T. (2010). Using the clark simulation evaluation rubric with associate degree and baccalaureate nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(2), 101-105.
  12. Hayden, J. (2010). Use of simulation in nursing education: National survey results. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 1(3), 52-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30335-5
  13. Kardong-Edgren, S. E., Adamson, K. A., & Fitzgerald, C. (2010). A review of currently published evaluation instruments for human patient simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6(1), e25-e35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.08.004
  14. Kardong-Edgren, S. E., Starkweather, A. R., & Ward, L. D. (2008). The integration of simulation into a clinical foundations of nursing course: Student and faculty perspectives. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1603
  15. Kim, H. R. (2013). The proposed rubrics simulation education effect on nursing student's academic achievement. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 19(4), 487-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.4.487
  16. Kneebone, R., Kidd, J., Nestel, D., Asvall, S., Paraskevas, P., & Darzi, A. (2002). An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Medical Education, 36(7), 628-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01261.x
  17. Kolb, S. E., & Shugart, E. B. (1984). Evaluation: is simulation the answer? The Journal of Nursing Education, 23(2), 84-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19840201-12
  18. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. (2014). Specify the colleges four-year term of study screening. Retrieved January 20, 2014, from Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education Web site: http://kabon.or.kr/kabon02/index04.php
  19. Lasater, K. (2011). Clinical judgment: the last frontier for evaluation. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), 86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013
  20. Lewis, R., Strachan, A., & Smith, M. M. (2012). Is high fidelity simulation the most effective method for the development of non-technical skills in nursing? A review of the current evidence. The Open Nursing Journal, 6, 82-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874434601206010082
  21. Mitchell, L., & Flin, R. (2008). Non-technical skills of the operating theatre scrub nurse: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63(1), 15-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04695.x.
  22. Mulder, M., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Wesselink, R. (2009). The new competence concept in higher education: Error or enrichment? Journal of European Industrial, 33(8), 755-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090590910993616
  23. Paris, C., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). Teamwork in multi-person systems: A review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084879
  24. Rhodes, M. L., & Curran, C. (2005). Use of the human patient simulator to teach clinical judgment skills in a baccalaureate nursing program. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 23(5), 256-262. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024665-200509000-00009
  25. Sung, T. J. (2002). Validity and reliability. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  26. Sung, T. J. (1996). Theory and practice: item development and analysis. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  27. Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204-211.
  28. Todd, M., Manz, J. A., Hawkins, K. S., Parsons, M. E., & Hercinger, M. (2008). The development of a quantitative evaluation tool for simulations in nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1705
  29. Yang, B. W. (1998). Introduction and application of multivariate data analysis. Seoul: Hakjisa.

Cited by

  1. 임상실습 전 시뮬레이션 기반 교육이 간호학생의 간호지식, 임상실습 불안, 임상수행 능력에 미치는 효과 vol.25, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2019.25.3.289
  2. 시뮬레이션 기반한 심근경색증 상황 교육 적용에 따른 임상판단력과 간호수행자신감 vol.22, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.21289/ksic.2019.22.6.721
  3. 팀 기반 시뮬레이션 실습교육이 간호학생의 환자안전 자신감과 간호역량에 미치는 효과 vol.26, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14370/jewnr.2020.26.2.130
  4. 간호대학생의 첫 임상실습 전·후 간호역량과 전공만족도의 차이 vol.19, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2021.19.7.237