DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mapping Items of Functioning Questionnaires into the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Stroke

  • Song, Ju-Min (Department of Physical Therapy, Silla University) ;
  • Lee, Hae-Jung (Department of Physical Therapy, Silla University)
  • Received : 2016.09.20
  • Accepted : 2016.10.07
  • Published : 2016.10.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate items of commonly used questionnaires that measure functioning status of persons with stroke and map to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Methods: Eighty-six patients with stroke were recruited from 12 medical institutes for the study. Each item of the Modified Bathel Index (MBI), Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), Mini Mental Status Evaluation (MMSE) and SF-36 were examined and compared its concept with the ICF. Concept linking was performed by 10 health professionals independently. A field test was performed to assess its correlation between those of scales and their linked ICF category sets. Results: It was found that 11 items in MBI was linked to 14 ICF categories, whereas 27 items of MMSE had 10 categories of ICF linked. 60 items of SIS were to be linked with 35 ICF categories. Agreement between professionals in linking was found to be high: 97.5% for MBI items, 78.0%, 78.0%, and 74.8% for MMSE, SIS, and SF-36 respectively. Strong relationship was observed between measurement scales and linked ICF code sets (r=-0.76 for SIS, r=-0.78 for MBI, r=-0.47 for MMSE) whereas there was no relationship was found between SF-36 and its ICF code set (r=-0.06) from the field test. Conclusion: It was found that items of SIS, MMSE and MBI may be linked to ICF categories. Those of linking concept between clinical tools and the ICF could be helpful for clinical data standardization.

Keywords

References

  1. WHO. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva, WHO. 2013.
  2. Tse T, Douglas J, Lentin P et al. Measuring participation after stroke: a review of frequently used tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(1):177-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.002
  3. WHO. Toward a common language for functioning, disability and health. http://wwwwhoint/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguidepdf. 2002.
  4. Lee H, Song J. Which information is commonly used for patients with stroke at rehabilitation settings? J Kor Phys Ther. 2015;27(6):392-9. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2015.27.6.392
  5. Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:201-11.
  6. Kohler F, Connolly C, Sakaria A et al. Can the ICF be used as a rehabilitation outcome measure? A study looking at the inter-and intra-rater reliability of ICF categories derived from an adl assessment tool. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(9):881-7. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1194
  7. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(6):315-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400008545
  8. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9): 507-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828040008552
  9. Song J, Lee H. Investigating functional level in patients with stroke using ICF concept. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(5):351-7.
  10. Lee H, Song J. The Korean language version of stroke impact scale 3.0: cross-cultural adaptation and translation. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2015;10(3):47-55. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2015.10.3.47
  11. Jung H, Park B, Shin H et al. Development of the Korean version of modified Barthel index (K-MBI): multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J Kor Acad Rehabil Med 2007;31(3):283-97.
  12. Kwon Y, Park J, No I. Standardization of Korean of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE-K) for use in the elderly. Part ii. Diagnostic validity. Neuropsychiatric association. 1989;28(3):508-13.
  13. Ware J, Sherbourne CD. The mos 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6): 473-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
  14. Lee H, Song J. Development of revised Korean version of ICF. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(5):344-50.
  15. WHO. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: Korean version. 2nd. Seoul, WHO. 2016.
  16. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040263
  17. Schepers VPM, Ketelaar M, van de Port IGL et al. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(3):221-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600756257
  18. Moriello C, Byrne K, Cieza A et al. Mapping the stroke impact scale (SIS-16) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(2):102-6. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0141
  19. Campos TF, Rodrigues CA, Farias IMA et al. Comparison of instruments for sleep, cognition and function evaluation in stroke patients according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Braz J Phys Ther. 2012;16(1):23-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012000100005
  20. De Vriendt P, Gorus E, Bautmans I et al. Conversion of the mini-mental state examination to the international classification of functioning, disability and health terminology and scoring system. Gerontology. 2012;58(2):112-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000330088
  21. Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(5):1225-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4773-0

Cited by

  1. Linking of Items in Two Function-related Questionnaires to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Shoulder Pain vol.30, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2018.30.6.239
  2. Korean Cultural Adaptation of WHODAS 2.0 (36-Item Version): Reliability and Linking to ICF vol.30, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2018.30.6.246
  3. Assessment Using the ICF-core set for Children and Youth with Cerebral Palsy: A Single Case Study vol.31, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.2.103
  4. Functioning Characteristics of Patients with Neck Pain: ICF Concept Based vol.31, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.4.242
  5. A Review of Domestic Research Trends Related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): 2015-2020 vol.16, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2021.16.3.65
  6. Review on ICF-related Research Trends in Korean Clinical Field vol.16, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2021.16.4.33