Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회논문지)

Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Influence of Online WOM Information Characteristics on the Intention of Information Acceptance and also Re-WOM: Focused on the Receiver's Expertis

온라인 구전정보특성이 정보수용의도와 재구전 의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 수신자의 전문성을 중심으로

  • Received : 2016.10.29
  • Accepted : 2016.12.26
  • Published : 2016.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An actual analysis was made regarding how different the effect of the online WOM information characteristics on the expansion of the WOM information characteristics was depending on the level of the receiver's expertise in consideration of the sender's expertise, the vividness and Consensus of WOM information which can affect the acceptance of WOM information in this study. To begin with, the analysis results showed that the online WOM information characteristics had the positive effect on the information acceptance intention in proportion to the sender's expertise and the vividness and Consensus of WOM information. Secondly, the information acceptance intention was found to have a positive effect on the re-WOM intention. Finally, the level of receiver's expertise was found to control the effect of the online WOM information characteristics on the information acceptance intention.

본 연구는 구전정보 수용에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 발신자의 전문성, 구전정보의 생생함과 동의성을 고려하여 온라인 구전정보특성이 구전정보 확산에 미치는 영향관계가 수신자의 전문성 수준에 따라 어떻게 차이가 나는지 확인하고자 실증 분석하였다. 분석결과 첫째, 발신자의 전문성이 높고 구전정보가 생생하고 동의성이 높을수록 정보수용의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 정보수용의도가 재구전의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 수신자의 전문성 수준은 온라인 구전정보 특성이 정보수용의도에 미치는 영향력을 조절하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Helm, S., “Viral Marketing-Establishing Customer Relationships by 'Word-of-Mouse',” Electronic Markets, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 158-161, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/10196780050177053
  2. Martin, D. and Lomax, W., "Word-of-Mouse vs. Word-of-Mouth: The Effects of the Internet on Consumer's Pre-Purchase Information Search Activities," Marketing in the New Millennium: Proceedings of the 29th EMAC Conference 5, 2000.
  3. Chatterjee, P., "Online Review: Do Consumers Use Them?," Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 28, pp. 129-133, 2001.
  4. Lee, S. N. and Lee, K. Y., “Determinants of eWOM Behavior of SNS Users: With Emphasis on Personal Characteristics, SNS Traits, Interpersonal Influence, Social Capital,” Korean Journal of Advertising, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 273-315, 2013.
  5. Park, J. Y., "The Effects of the Characteristics of Word of Mouth Information Communicated Through SNS's on Word of Mouth Effects," Korean Journal of Tourism Research, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 273-315, 2013.
  6. Kim, J. H., An, E. M., and Kim, G. H., “Effects Information Directionality and Types of Information Based on Tie Strength Between Senders and Receivers on Senders' Word-of-Mouth Intention,” Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 93-112, 2006.
  7. Ko, J. Y., Kim, H. K., and Yun, S. J., “A Study on the Effect of Message Direction and Characteristics in e-WOM : Focused on Facebook Users,” Service Marketing Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 15-28, 2014.
  8. Lee, J. Y. and Jang, P. S., "Effects of Message Polarity and Type on Word of Mouth through SNS," The Journal of Digital Policy & Management 2013, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 129-135, 2013.
  9. Shin, S. W. and Kim, J. H., “The Effects of Reply Valence, Consensus and Friend's Recommendation on the Word-of-Mouth Diffusion and Purchase Intention within the Context of Social Network Service,” The e-Business Studies, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 3-32, 2013.
  10. Kim, S. H. and Cheon, H. J., “The Effect of Social Distance of Messenger, Source Credibility and Message Sidedness on Increase or Decrease of Persuasion,” Korean Journal of Advertising, Vol. 26, No. 8, pp. 35-59, 2015.
  11. Hwang, Y. Y., Lee, K S., and Choi, S. A., "A Study on the Difference between Young and Old Generation of SNS Behavior," Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 63-77. 2015. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2015.20.1.063
  12. Chu and Kim, "Determinants of Consumer Engagement in Electronic Word-of-Mouth in Social Networking Sites," International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 30, pp. 47-75, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
  13. Yun, H. S. and Bae, S. W., “The Effect of Sender's and Receiver's Expertise On the Receiver's Attitude about Word-of-Mouth: The Moderating Role of Tie Strength,” Journal of Marketing Management Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 83-112, 2011.
  14. Park, T. W. and Lee, K. Y., "An Integrated Model of Information Processing of eWOM in Social Network Service," Advertising Research, Vol. 100, pp. 172-224, 2014.
  15. Jun, S. Y., Chae, R., and Park, H. K., “The Influence of the Characteristics of the WOM Information on the WOM Communication Intention of a Sender,” Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 71-9, 2015.
  16. Park, E. A., “Effects of the Direction of Online Reviews on Purchase Decision : The Role of Product Type and Brand Reputation,” Korean Journal of Advertising, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 7-22, 2007.
  17. Bimbaum, M. and Steven. S., "Source Credibility in Social Judgement: Bias, Expertise, and the Judges Point of View," Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, Vol. 37, pp. 48-74, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.48
  18. Kim, C. H. and Hwang, E. R., "The Relationship WOM Information Characteristics and WOM Effectiveness" Advertising Research, Vol. 35, pp. 55-97, 1997.
  19. Jeon, S. L. and Park, H. J., “The Influence of Information Characteristics on Word-of-Mouth Effect,” Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 21-44, 2003.
  20. Yun H. S. and Bae, S. W., “The Effect of Sender's and Receiver's Expertise On the Receiver's Attitude about Word-of-Mouth: The Moderating Role of Tie Strength,” Journal of Marketing Management Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 83-112, 2011.
  21. Chiou, J., and Cheng, C., “Should a Company Have Message Boards on Its Web Site?,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 50-61, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10059
  22. Lee, E. Y. and Lee, T. M., “The Effects of Information Characteristics on Word of Mouth Performance in Online Environment : Focused on the Moderating Effect of Consumer Knowledge,” The Korean Journal of Advertising, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 145-171, 2005.
  23. Sen S. and Lerman, D., “Why Are You Telling Me This? An Examination into Negative Consumer Reviews on the Web,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 76-94, 2007.
  24. Park, C. and Yoo, C. J., “Study on the Effects of Consumers' Word of Mouth about Brand Experiences and Responses on Brand Evaluations at Online Context,” Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 73-93, 2012.
  25. Schindler R. M. and Bickart, B., "Published Word of Mouth: Regenerable, Consumer-Generated Information on the Internet," In Haugtvedt, C. P., Machleit, K. A., Yalch, R. F.(Eds.)," Online Consumer Psychology; Understanding and Influencing Consumer Behavior in the Virtual World. Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 35-62, 2005.
  26. Nisbett R. E. and Ross, L., "Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment," Englewood Cliffs, of Social Judgment," Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 1980.
  27. Newman P. J., "An Investigation of Consumer of Consumer Reactions to Negative Word-of-Mouth on the Internet," Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois. 2003.
  28. Lim, J. W. and Lee, E. Y., “Online Word-of-Mouth, Online Information, Credibility, Referability, Consensus, Vividness, Community Interaction, Information Accessibility, Information Flexibility,” Korean Marketing Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 59-77, 2007.
  29. Yang, H. B., Seo, S. Y., Nam, Y. H., and Lee, H. Y., “The Effects of Online Information Characteristics on the Online Word-of-Mouth : The Mediation Effects of Product Involvement and Trust,” The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 31-53, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9070-0
  30. Park, T. W. and Lee, K. Y., "An Integrated Model of Information Processing of eWOM in Social Network Service," Advertising Research, Vol. 100, pp. 172-224, 2014.
  31. Kim, J. H. and Kim, B. Y., "The Influence of the Information Types and the Consumer's Prior Attitude toward the Corportion on Intention of Word-of-Mouth," Advertising Research, Vol. 63, pp. 31-54, 2004.
  32. Kim, M. J. and Seo, U. H., "Causal Model of Online Word-of-Mouth Information Redelivery-Focusing on Reviews of Fashion Related Goods," Journal of Consumption Culture, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 95-114, 2010.
  33. Johnson, E. and Russo, J., “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 542-550, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1086/208990
  34. Brucks, M., “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-16, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1086/209031
  35. Alba, J. W., “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 411-454, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1086/209080
  36. Herr, P. M., Kardes F. R. and Kim, J., “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 454-462, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1086/208570
  37. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes F. R., and Herr, P. M., “The Role of Prior Knowledge and Missing Information in Multiattribute Evaluation,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 76-91, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90005-R
  38. Wallsten T. S. and Budescu, D. V., “Encoding Subjective Probabilities: A Psychological and Psychometric Review,” Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 151-173, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.2.151
  39. Park, C. W. and Lessing, P., “Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Biases and Heuristics,,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 223-230, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1086/208859
  40. Bloch, P. H., Sherrell D. L., and Ridgway, N. M., “Consumer Search: An Extended Framework,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 119-126, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1086/209052
  41. McCroskey J. C. and Young, T. J., "Ethos and Credibility: The Construct and Its Measurement after Three Decades," Central States Speech Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 24-34, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978109368075
  42. Aaker, J. L., "Dimensions of Brand Personality," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp.347-356, 1997.
  43. Park, C. and Lee, T. M., "Effects of Direction and Type of Electronic Word of Mouth Information on Purchase Decision: Cross-Cultural Comparison between Korea and U. S.," Journal of Korean Marketing Association Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 29-56, 2006.
  44. Anderson, J, and Gerbing, W., “Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two Stage Approach,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 5-24, 1988.
  45. Choi, Y. M. and Bae, S. W., “A Study on the Impacts of WOM Information Characteristics on WOM Effect,” Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 307-314, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.2.307
  46. Lee, M. B., “A Study of Factors Influencing the Satisfaction of SNS Use,” Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 61-73, 2012.

Cited by

  1. 은행의 서비스품질이 고객만족과 관계지속의도 및 교차구매의도에 미치는 영향 vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2017.22.3.095
  2. The Impact of Customer Value on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in Hotel Firms vol.42, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.32780/ktidoi.2017.42.3.141
  3. 회계정보시스템의 품질요인이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 - 사용자 만족도 및 교육성과의 매개효과를 중심으로 - vol.23, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2018.23.2.041