DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Decision Making Algorithm for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

  • Kim, Yongjung J. (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Service, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons) ;
  • Hyun, Seung-Jae (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cheh, Gene (Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Samuel K. (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) ;
  • Rhim, Seung-Chul (Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.02.24
  • Accepted : 2016.04.05
  • Published : 2016.07.01

Abstract

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is one of the most challenging spinal disorders associated with broad range of clinical and radiological presentation. Correct selection of fusion levels in surgical planning for the management of adult spinal deformity is a complex task. Several classification systems and algorithms exist to assist surgeons in determining the appropriate levels to be instrumented. In this study, we describe our new simple decision making algorithm and selection of fusion level for ASD surgery in terms of adult idiopathic idiopathic scoliosis vs. degenerative scoliosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Bridwell KH : Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 (19 Suppl) : S171-S178, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000231963.72810.38
  2. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K : Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A : 454-463, 2003
  3. Cho SK, Shin JI, Kim YJ : Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 23 : 2726-2736, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3531-4
  4. Clements DH, Marks M, Newton PO, Betz RR, Lenke L, Shufflebarger H; Harms Study Group : Did the Lenke classification change scoliosis treatment? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 : 1142-1145, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318207e9c4
  5. Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Jung Kim Y, Berra AB, et al. : Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis to L5 in adults : the fate of the L5-S1 disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 2122-2231, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000084266.37210.85
  6. Fischer CR, Kim Y : Selective fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a review of current operative strategy. Eur Spine J 20 : 1048-1057, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1730-9
  7. Ha Y, Maruo K, Racine L, Schairer WW, Hu SS, Deviren V, et al. : Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum : a comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae. J Neurosurg Spine 19 : 360-369, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.5.SPINE12737
  8. Harrington PR : Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44-A : 591-610, 1962
  9. Hibbs RA : A report of fifty-nine cases of scoliosis treated by the fusion operation. By Russell A. Hibbs, 1924. Clin Orthop Relat Res (229) : 4-19, 1988
  10. Hyun SJ, Kim YJ, Rhim SC : Spinal pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients. World J Clin Cases 1 : 242-248, 2013 https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v1.i8.242
  11. Hyun SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YC, Koester LA, Blanke KM : Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : 1899-1904, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000556
  12. Hyun SJ, Rhim SC : Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients : a long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47 : 95-101, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.47.2.95
  13. Hyun SJ, Rhim SC, Kim YJ, Kim YB : A mid-term follow-up result of spinopelvic fixation using iliac screws for lumbosacral fusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 48 : 347-353, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.48.4.347
  14. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G : Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion : minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33 : 2179-2184, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c0428
  15. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G : An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1 : can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 2343-2352, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000238970.67552.f5
  16. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Kim YW : Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 : 2653-2661, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5a9d
  17. Kim YJ, Fischer CR, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Boachie-Adjei O, Clement J, et al : Optimal lower instrumented vertebra to avoid adding-on or distal junctional kyphosis for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Podium presentation no. 88. Proceeding of the Scoliosis Research Society Annual Meeting; 2011 Sep 14-17; Louisville, USA. Milwaukee, WI : SRS, 2011
  18. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB : The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65 : 1302-1313, 1983 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198365090-00012
  19. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Harms J, Lowe TG, et al. : Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 : 1097-1106, 1998 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199808000-00002
  20. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, et al. : Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A : 1169-1181, 2001
  21. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Blanke K : Preventing decompensation in King type II curves treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Strict guidelines for selective thoracic fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17 (8 Suppl) : S274-S281, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199208001-00011
  22. Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH : The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity : building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 (19 Suppl) : S119-S125, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000232709.48446.be
  23. Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cronen GA, Mulconrey DS, Buchowski JM, et al. : Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 : 785-791, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819d0c86
  24. Smith JS, Klineberg E, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Moal B, Ames CP, et al. : Change in classification grade by the SRS-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures : prospective analysis of operative and nonoperative treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 : 1663-1671, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ec563
  25. Sudo H, Kaneda K, Shono Y, Iwasaki N : Selection of the upper vertebra to be instrumented in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by anterior correction and fusion surgery using dual-rod instrumentation : a minimum 12-year follow-up study. Spine J 16 : 281-287, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.021
  26. Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, Kim JH, Kim SS : Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis : more than 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 1602-1609, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000169452.50705.61
  27. Sun Z, Qiu G, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zhang J, Shen J : Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection for selective posterior fusion of moderate thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis : lower-end vertebra or lower-end vertebra+1? Eur Spine J 23 : 1251-1257, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3276-0
  28. Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Devos P, Ames CP, et al. : The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification : assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 73 : 559-568, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000012
  29. Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV : Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65 : 447-455, 1983 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198365040-00004
  30. Youssef JA, Orndorff DO, Patty CA, Scott MA, Price HL, Hamlin LF, et al. : Current status of adult spinal deformity. Global Spine J 3 : 51-62, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1326950

Cited by

  1. Restoration of Sagittal Balance in Spinal Deformity Surgery vol.61, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0404.013
  2. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters on Full-Spine Radiographs in Adults With Symptomatic Spinal Disorders vol.15, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836054.027
  3. Total Deformity Angular Ratio as a Risk Factor for Complications after Posterior Vertebral Column Resection Surgery vol.61, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2018.0125
  4. Spinal Deformity Surgery : It Becomes an Essential Part of Neurosurgery vol.61, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2018.0150
  5. Adult Spinal Deformity: Current Concepts and Decision-Making Strategies for Management vol.14, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0568
  6. Selection of Fusion Level for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery : Selective Fusion versus Postoperative Decompensation vol.64, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0258