Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Robotic Harvest of a Right Gastroepiploic Lymph Node Flap

  • Ciudad, Pedro (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Date, Shivprasad (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Ming-Hsien (Department of General Surgery, China Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Torto, Federico Lo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Nicoli, Fabio (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Araki, Jun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Chen, Hung-Chi (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital)
  • Received : 2015.12.01
  • Accepted : 2016.02.07
  • Published : 2016.03.18
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Ciudad P, Maruccia M, Socas J, et al. The laparoscopic right gastroepiploic lymph node flap transfer for upper and lower limb lymphedema: technique and outcomes. Microsurgery 2015 Jul 15 [Epub]. http://dx/doi.org/10.1002/micr.22450.
  2. Nguyen AT, Suami H. Laparoscopic free omental lymphatic flap for the treatment of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:114-8.
  3. Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:1305-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecc0b
  4. Katz RD, Rosson GD, Taylor JA, et al. Robotics in microsurgery: use of a surgical robot to perform a free flap in a pig. Microsurgery 2005;25:566-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20160

Cited by

  1. A Systematic Review of the Role of Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—From Inception to the Future vol.4, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2017.00066
  2. A head‐to‐head comparison among donor site morbidity after vascularized lymph node transfer: Pearls and pitfalls of a 6‐year single center experience vol.115, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24349
  3. Comparison of long‐term clinical outcomes among different vascularized lymph node transfers: 6‐year experience of a single center's approach to the treatment of lymphedema vol.116, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24730
  4. Staged surgical treatment of extremity lymphedema with dual gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node transfers followed by suction‐assisted lipectomy—A prospective study vol.117, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24969
  5. Ileocecal vascularized lymph node transfer for the treatment of extremity lymphedema: A case report vol.39, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30186
  6. Combined double vascularized lymph node transfers and modified radical reduction with preservation of perforators for advanced stages of lymphedema vol.119, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25360
  7. Robotic inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma: a novel approach to a complicated problem vol.13, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-00906-x
  8. The deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap connected to gastroepiploic lymph node flap for treatment of refractory chylous ascites: Report of two cases vol.41, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30736
  9. Vascularized omental lymphatic transplant for upper extremity lymphedema: A systematic review vol.4, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1370