Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measuring Situation Awareness of Operating Team in Different Main Control Room Environments of Nuclear Power Plants

  • Lee, Seung Woo (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Ar Ryum (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Jinkyun (Integrated Safety Assessment Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Kang, Hyun Gook (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Seong, Poong Hyun (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2015.06.29
  • Accepted : 2015.09.25
  • Published : 2016.02.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Environments in nuclear power plants (NPPs) are changing as the design of instrumentation and control systems for NPPs is rapidly moving toward fully digital instrumentation and control, and modern computer techniques are gradually introduced into main control rooms (MCRs). Within the context of these environmental changes, the level of performance of operators in a digital MCR is a major concern. Situation awareness (SA), which is used within human factors research to explain to what extent operators of safety-critical systems know what is transpiring in the system and the environment, is considered a prerequisite factor to guarantee the safe operation of NPPs. However, the safe operation of NPPs can be guaranteed through a team effort. In this regard, the operating team's SA in a conventional and digital MCR should be measured in order to assess whether the new design features implemented in a digital MCR affect this parameter. This paper explains the team SA measurement method used in this study and the results of applying this measurement method to operating teams in different MCR environments. The paper also discusses several empirical lessons learned from the results.

Keywords

References

  1. J. O'Hara, B. Gunther, G. Martinez-Guridi, The Effects of Degraded Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems on Human-system Interfaces and Operator Performance: HFE Review Guidance and Technical Basis, BNL, 2010.
  2. J. O'Hara, W.F. Stubler, J. Kramer, Human factors consideration in control room modernization: trends and personnel performance issues, in: IEEE Sixth Annual Human Factors Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA, 1997.
  3. A. Sebok, Team performance in process control: influences of interface design and staffing levels, Ergonomics 43 (2000) 1210-1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084950
  4. J. O'Hara, E. Roth, Integrating Digital and Conventional Human-system Interfaces: Lessons Learned from a Control Room Modernization Program, NUREG/CR-6749, US NRC, U.S., 2002.
  5. P.H. Seong, Reliability and Risk Issues in Large Scale Safety-critical Digital Control System, Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, Berlin, 2009.
  6. H.K. Andersen, G. Hauland, Measuring team situation awareness of reactor operators during normal operation: a technical pilot study, in: B.K. David, M.R. Endsley (Eds.), Human Performance, Situation Awareness & Automation: User-centered Design for the New Millennium. Proceedings of the First Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation Conference, Savannah, GA, October 15-19, 2000, pp. 268-273.
  7. P.O. Braarud, Subjective Task Complexity in the Control Room, HWR-621, OECD Halden Reactor Project, 2000.
  8. P.O. Braarud, H. Brendryen, Task Demand, Task Management, and Team Work, HWR-657, OECD Halden Reactor Project, Norway, 2001.
  9. A.O. Braseth, C. Nihlwing, H. Svengren, O. Veland, L. Hurlen, J. Kvalem, Lessons learned from Halden project research on human system interfaces, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 41 (2009) 215-224. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2009.41.3.215
  10. S.W. Lee, A.R. Kim, J.S. Ha, P.H. Seong, Development of a qualitative evaluation framework for performance shaping factors in advanced MCR HRA, Ann. Nucl. Energy 38 (2011) 1751-1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.04.006
  11. I.S. Jang, J.K. Park, P.H. Seong, Development of an evaluation method for the quality of NPP MCR operators' communication using work domain analysis (WDA), Ann. Nucl. Energy 38 (2011) 1881-1888.
  12. J.S. Ha, P.H. Seong, M.S. Lee, J.H. Hong, Development of human performance measures for human factors validation in the advanced MCR for APR-1400, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54 (2007) 2687-2700. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2007.907549
  13. J.K. Park, The use of a social network analysis technique to investigate the characteristics of crew communications in nuclear power plants-a feasibility study, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (2011) 1275-1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.05.003
  14. A.R. Kim, J.K. Park, S.W. Lee, H.G. Kang, P.H. Seong, Understanding team communication characteristics using social network analysis, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 105 (2011) 319-320.
  15. J.H. Kim, J.H. Kim, J.K. Park, S.C. Jang, Y.C. Shin, Some empirical insights on diagnostic performance of the operating crew in a computer-based advanced control room, Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 21 (2011) 379-396. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20241
  16. K. Smith, P.A. Hancock, Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness, Hum. Factors 37 (1995) 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049444
  17. D.B. Kaber, C.M. Perry, N. Segall, C.K. McClernon, L.J. Prinzel, Situation awareness implications of an adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task, Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 36 (2006) 447-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.008
  18. S.K. Kim, S.N. Byun, D.H. Lee, Development and validation of a heuristic model for evaluation of the team performance of operators in nuclear power plants, Ann. Nucl. Energy 38 (2011) 2005-2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.04.016
  19. S.W. Lee, J.K. Park, A.R. Kim, P.H. Seong, Measuring situation awareness of operation teams in NPPs using a verbal protocol analysis, Ann. Nucl. Energy 43 (2012) 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.005
  20. M.R. Endsley, Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems, Hum. Factors 37 (1995) 32-64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
  21. D.B. Kaber, M.R. Endsley, Team situation awareness for process control safety and performance, Process Control 17 (1998) 43-48.
  22. S.K. Kim, J.K. Park, S.Y. Han, H.J. Kim, Development of extended speech act coding scheme to observe communication characteristics of human operators of nuclear power plants under abnormal conditions, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23 (2010) 539-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.04.005
  23. E. Hollnagel, O.M. Pedersen, J. Rasmussen, Notes on Human Performance Analysis, Riso Notional Laboratory, Roskelde, Denmark, 1981.
  24. E.M. Roth, R.J. Mumaw, P.M. Lewis, An Empirical Investigation of Operator Performance in Cognitive Demanding Simulated Emergencies, NUREG/CR-6208, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
  25. J.K. Park, S.H. Kim, M.C. Kim, Analysis of Communication Contents and the Associated Crew Performance Data Collected from Abnormal Operating Conditions for Nuclear Power Plants, KAERI/TR-4159, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Republic of Korea, 2010.

Cited by

  1. Human Reliability Analysis for Digitized Nuclear Power Plants: Case Study on the LingAo II Nuclear Power Plant vol.49, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.01.011
  2. Inter-relationships between performance shaping factors for human reliability analysis of nuclear power plants vol.52, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.07.004
  3. Electroencephalography-Based Intention Monitoring to Support Nuclear Operators’ Communications for Safety-Relevant Tasks vol.207, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1837583